Cargando…

Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature

PURPOSE: Four cases of corneal ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) have been reported. In this review, we provide an overview of the published literature on corneal ectasia after SMILE and risk factors associated with this complication. METHODS: Case reports were identified by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moshirfar, Majid, Albarracin, Julio C, Desautels, Jordan D, Birdsong, Orry C, Linn, Steven H, Hoopes, Phillip C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979096
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S147011
_version_ 1783265382023299072
author Moshirfar, Majid
Albarracin, Julio C
Desautels, Jordan D
Birdsong, Orry C
Linn, Steven H
Hoopes, Phillip C
author_facet Moshirfar, Majid
Albarracin, Julio C
Desautels, Jordan D
Birdsong, Orry C
Linn, Steven H
Hoopes, Phillip C
author_sort Moshirfar, Majid
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Four cases of corneal ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) have been reported. In this review, we provide an overview of the published literature on corneal ectasia after SMILE and risk factors associated with this complication. METHODS: Case reports were identified by a search of seven electronic databases for pertinent heading terms between 2011 and July 2017. We identified patient characteristics and surgical details including preoperative topography, central corneal thickness, and anterior keratometry (Km). Residual stromal bed (RSB) values not reported were computed using VisuMax ReLEx SMILE software Version 2.10.10. Preoperative ectasia risk was measured using the Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS). Percent tissue alteration was calculated for each patient as described by Santhiago et al. RESULTS: Seven eyes of four patients developed corneal ectasia post SMILE. Two patients had abnormal topography in both eyes. One patient had abnormal topography in one eye. Only one patient was noted to have normal topography in both eyes and later developed ectasia in one eye in the absence of any known risk factors. The mean Randleman ectasia risk score was 4±3 (range: 1–8). The mean calculated percent tissue altered (PTA) was 38%±6% (range: 30%–47%). CONCLUSION: A majority of reported ectasia cases occurred in patients with subclinical keratoconus. These conditions may be exacerbated by SMILE and should be considered absolute contraindications to the procedure. Three patients were identified to have high risk based on the ERSS, and one patient exhibited a PTA ≥40%. We formulated a modification to the current calculation of PTA that takes into account the differences in tissue altered between SMILE and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). More studies are needed to fully quantify the risk of ectasia. For now, we propose adopting the same exclusion criteria used for LASIK in the SMILE procedure until more specific metrics have been validated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5608083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56080832017-10-04 Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature Moshirfar, Majid Albarracin, Julio C Desautels, Jordan D Birdsong, Orry C Linn, Steven H Hoopes, Phillip C Clin Ophthalmol Review PURPOSE: Four cases of corneal ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) have been reported. In this review, we provide an overview of the published literature on corneal ectasia after SMILE and risk factors associated with this complication. METHODS: Case reports were identified by a search of seven electronic databases for pertinent heading terms between 2011 and July 2017. We identified patient characteristics and surgical details including preoperative topography, central corneal thickness, and anterior keratometry (Km). Residual stromal bed (RSB) values not reported were computed using VisuMax ReLEx SMILE software Version 2.10.10. Preoperative ectasia risk was measured using the Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS). Percent tissue alteration was calculated for each patient as described by Santhiago et al. RESULTS: Seven eyes of four patients developed corneal ectasia post SMILE. Two patients had abnormal topography in both eyes. One patient had abnormal topography in one eye. Only one patient was noted to have normal topography in both eyes and later developed ectasia in one eye in the absence of any known risk factors. The mean Randleman ectasia risk score was 4±3 (range: 1–8). The mean calculated percent tissue altered (PTA) was 38%±6% (range: 30%–47%). CONCLUSION: A majority of reported ectasia cases occurred in patients with subclinical keratoconus. These conditions may be exacerbated by SMILE and should be considered absolute contraindications to the procedure. Three patients were identified to have high risk based on the ERSS, and one patient exhibited a PTA ≥40%. We formulated a modification to the current calculation of PTA that takes into account the differences in tissue altered between SMILE and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). More studies are needed to fully quantify the risk of ectasia. For now, we propose adopting the same exclusion criteria used for LASIK in the SMILE procedure until more specific metrics have been validated. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5608083/ /pubmed/28979096 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S147011 Text en © 2017 Moshirfar et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Moshirfar, Majid
Albarracin, Julio C
Desautels, Jordan D
Birdsong, Orry C
Linn, Steven H
Hoopes, Phillip C
Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature
title Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature
title_full Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature
title_fullStr Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature
title_short Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature
title_sort ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (smile): a review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979096
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S147011
work_keys_str_mv AT moshirfarmajid ectasiafollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileareviewoftheliterature
AT albarracinjulioc ectasiafollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileareviewoftheliterature
AT desautelsjordand ectasiafollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileareviewoftheliterature
AT birdsongorryc ectasiafollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileareviewoftheliterature
AT linnstevenh ectasiafollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileareviewoftheliterature
AT hoopesphillipc ectasiafollowingsmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileareviewoftheliterature