Cargando…

Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published

BACKGROUND: Very little is known about the proportion of oncology trials that get published, the time it takes to publish them, or the reasons why oncology trials do not get published. METHODS: We analyzed all clinical trials that closed to accrual at our cancer center between 2009–2013. Trials were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, Paul B., Liu, Nathan J., Zhou, Qin, Iasonos, Alexia, Hanley, Sara, Bosl, George J., Spriggs, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28934243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184025
_version_ 1783265402438025216
author Chapman, Paul B.
Liu, Nathan J.
Zhou, Qin
Iasonos, Alexia
Hanley, Sara
Bosl, George J.
Spriggs, David R.
author_facet Chapman, Paul B.
Liu, Nathan J.
Zhou, Qin
Iasonos, Alexia
Hanley, Sara
Bosl, George J.
Spriggs, David R.
author_sort Chapman, Paul B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Very little is known about the proportion of oncology trials that get published, the time it takes to publish them, or the reasons why oncology trials do not get published. METHODS: We analyzed all clinical trials that closed to accrual at our cancer center between 2009–2013. Trials were categorized by study purpose (therapeutic vs. diagnostic), phase (pilot, phase I, II, or III), and sponsor (industrial, cooperative group, institutional, or peer-reviewed). Final publications were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE by NCT numbers, or by querying the principal investigator. For trials not published, we surveyed the principal investigators to identify the reason for non-publication. FINDINGS: 469 of 809 protocols (58%) had been published by November 2016. The calculated probability of publication 7 years after completing accrual was 70.4%; the calculated median time to publication was 47 months. Only 18.8% of protocols overall were estimated to be published within 2 years from completing accrual. The calculated probability of publication was higher for therapeutic trials than non-therapeutic trials, but there was no difference based on phase or sponsor. Among protocols not published, 45.3% had completed accrual, and among these, a majority had a manuscript in preparation or review, or the trial was still collecting data. Failure to publish due to a pharmaceutical sponsor was rare. 30.6% of unpublished trials had closed for various reasons before completing accrual, usually due to poor accrual or pharmaceutical sponsor issues. INTERPRETATION: Almost 30% of trials were calculated to be unpublished by 7 years after closing to accrual at our institution. Failure to reach accrual goals was an important factor in non-publication. We have devised new institutional policies that identify trials likely not to meet accrual goals and require early closure. We should be able to shorten the time from accrual completion to publication, especially for pilot and phase I trials for which long follow up is not needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5608207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56082072017-10-09 Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published Chapman, Paul B. Liu, Nathan J. Zhou, Qin Iasonos, Alexia Hanley, Sara Bosl, George J. Spriggs, David R. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Very little is known about the proportion of oncology trials that get published, the time it takes to publish them, or the reasons why oncology trials do not get published. METHODS: We analyzed all clinical trials that closed to accrual at our cancer center between 2009–2013. Trials were categorized by study purpose (therapeutic vs. diagnostic), phase (pilot, phase I, II, or III), and sponsor (industrial, cooperative group, institutional, or peer-reviewed). Final publications were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE by NCT numbers, or by querying the principal investigator. For trials not published, we surveyed the principal investigators to identify the reason for non-publication. FINDINGS: 469 of 809 protocols (58%) had been published by November 2016. The calculated probability of publication 7 years after completing accrual was 70.4%; the calculated median time to publication was 47 months. Only 18.8% of protocols overall were estimated to be published within 2 years from completing accrual. The calculated probability of publication was higher for therapeutic trials than non-therapeutic trials, but there was no difference based on phase or sponsor. Among protocols not published, 45.3% had completed accrual, and among these, a majority had a manuscript in preparation or review, or the trial was still collecting data. Failure to publish due to a pharmaceutical sponsor was rare. 30.6% of unpublished trials had closed for various reasons before completing accrual, usually due to poor accrual or pharmaceutical sponsor issues. INTERPRETATION: Almost 30% of trials were calculated to be unpublished by 7 years after closing to accrual at our institution. Failure to reach accrual goals was an important factor in non-publication. We have devised new institutional policies that identify trials likely not to meet accrual goals and require early closure. We should be able to shorten the time from accrual completion to publication, especially for pilot and phase I trials for which long follow up is not needed. Public Library of Science 2017-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5608207/ /pubmed/28934243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184025 Text en © 2017 Chapman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chapman, Paul B.
Liu, Nathan J.
Zhou, Qin
Iasonos, Alexia
Hanley, Sara
Bosl, George J.
Spriggs, David R.
Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published
title Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published
title_full Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published
title_fullStr Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published
title_full_unstemmed Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published
title_short Time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published
title_sort time to publication of oncology trials and why some trials are never published
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28934243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184025
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmanpaulb timetopublicationofoncologytrialsandwhysometrialsareneverpublished
AT liunathanj timetopublicationofoncologytrialsandwhysometrialsareneverpublished
AT zhouqin timetopublicationofoncologytrialsandwhysometrialsareneverpublished
AT iasonosalexia timetopublicationofoncologytrialsandwhysometrialsareneverpublished
AT hanleysara timetopublicationofoncologytrialsandwhysometrialsareneverpublished
AT boslgeorgej timetopublicationofoncologytrialsandwhysometrialsareneverpublished
AT spriggsdavidr timetopublicationofoncologytrialsandwhysometrialsareneverpublished