Cargando…

Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of siponimod on response to T-cell–dependent (influenza) and T-cell–independent (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPV-23]) vaccinations in healthy participants. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, each participant underwent a 7-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ufer, Mike, Shakeri-Nejad, Kasra, Gardin, Anne, Su, Zhenzhong, Paule, Ines, Marbury, Thomas C., Legangneux, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000398
_version_ 1783265455920644096
author Ufer, Mike
Shakeri-Nejad, Kasra
Gardin, Anne
Su, Zhenzhong
Paule, Ines
Marbury, Thomas C.
Legangneux, Eric
author_facet Ufer, Mike
Shakeri-Nejad, Kasra
Gardin, Anne
Su, Zhenzhong
Paule, Ines
Marbury, Thomas C.
Legangneux, Eric
author_sort Ufer, Mike
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of siponimod on response to T-cell–dependent (influenza) and T-cell–independent (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPV-23]) vaccinations in healthy participants. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, each participant underwent a 7-week treatment period and received intramuscular injections of influenza and PPV-23 vaccines (day 21). Participants were randomized to 4 treatment groups (N = 30 each) and received placebo or siponimod 2 mg once daily in concomitant, interrupted, or preceding fashion. Individual response to vaccination was defined by a ≥4-fold (influenza) antibody titer increase and by a ≥2-fold increase in serotype-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G concentrations (PPV-23) on day 28 vs baseline. Responder rates were compared using noninferiority analysis. RESULTS: Mean influenza titers were similar to placebo in the preceding and interrupted groups but lower in the concomitant group. The proportion of participants with influenza titers ≥40 four weeks after vaccination (seroprotection) was similar to placebo across all groups and antigens. In each treatment group, response criteria were met for 3 of 4 antigens including H1N1 and H3N2. A noninferior response was determined in the context of preceding treatment but not interrupted or concomitant treatment. Regarding PPV-23, approximately 90%–100% of participants exhibited a ≥2-fold increase in IgG concentrations vs baseline. Noninferior responder rates were determined for each siponimod treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Siponimod treatment had no relevant effect on antibody response to PPV-23. European Medicines Agency response criteria were essentially met for influenza, but titers were lower on concomitant treatment. Overall, these data suggest that siponimod has limited effect on the efficacy of vaccinations with neoantigens. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in healthy persons, siponimod had limited effect on the immune response following influenza or pneumococcal vaccinations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5608565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56085652017-09-27 Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study Ufer, Mike Shakeri-Nejad, Kasra Gardin, Anne Su, Zhenzhong Paule, Ines Marbury, Thomas C. Legangneux, Eric Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of siponimod on response to T-cell–dependent (influenza) and T-cell–independent (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPV-23]) vaccinations in healthy participants. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, each participant underwent a 7-week treatment period and received intramuscular injections of influenza and PPV-23 vaccines (day 21). Participants were randomized to 4 treatment groups (N = 30 each) and received placebo or siponimod 2 mg once daily in concomitant, interrupted, or preceding fashion. Individual response to vaccination was defined by a ≥4-fold (influenza) antibody titer increase and by a ≥2-fold increase in serotype-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G concentrations (PPV-23) on day 28 vs baseline. Responder rates were compared using noninferiority analysis. RESULTS: Mean influenza titers were similar to placebo in the preceding and interrupted groups but lower in the concomitant group. The proportion of participants with influenza titers ≥40 four weeks after vaccination (seroprotection) was similar to placebo across all groups and antigens. In each treatment group, response criteria were met for 3 of 4 antigens including H1N1 and H3N2. A noninferior response was determined in the context of preceding treatment but not interrupted or concomitant treatment. Regarding PPV-23, approximately 90%–100% of participants exhibited a ≥2-fold increase in IgG concentrations vs baseline. Noninferior responder rates were determined for each siponimod treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Siponimod treatment had no relevant effect on antibody response to PPV-23. European Medicines Agency response criteria were essentially met for influenza, but titers were lower on concomitant treatment. Overall, these data suggest that siponimod has limited effect on the efficacy of vaccinations with neoantigens. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in healthy persons, siponimod had limited effect on the immune response following influenza or pneumococcal vaccinations. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5608565/ /pubmed/28955715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000398 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Ufer, Mike
Shakeri-Nejad, Kasra
Gardin, Anne
Su, Zhenzhong
Paule, Ines
Marbury, Thomas C.
Legangneux, Eric
Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study
title Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study
title_full Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study
title_fullStr Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study
title_short Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study
title_sort impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000398
work_keys_str_mv AT ufermike impactofsiponimodonvaccinationresponseinarandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT shakerinejadkasra impactofsiponimodonvaccinationresponseinarandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT gardinanne impactofsiponimodonvaccinationresponseinarandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT suzhenzhong impactofsiponimodonvaccinationresponseinarandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT pauleines impactofsiponimodonvaccinationresponseinarandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT marburythomasc impactofsiponimodonvaccinationresponseinarandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT legangneuxeric impactofsiponimodonvaccinationresponseinarandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy