Cargando…

Is WHODAS 2.0 Useful for Colorectal Cancer Survivors?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the disability level of colorectal cancer survivors with and without stoma by using the Korean version of the 12-item, interview-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (Korean version of WHODAS 2.0). METHODS: This is a multicenter (five tertia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lee, Hyun Haeng, Shin, Eun-Kyoung, Shin, Hyung-Ik, Yang, Eun Joo
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2017
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971052 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.4.667

Ejemplares similares

Measuring disability in multiple sclerosis: the WHODAS 2.0
por: Young, Carolyn A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effects of Hearing Disability on the Employment Status Using WHODAS 2.0 in Taiwan
por: Chao, Pin-Zhir, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Performance of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease
por: Kim, Ji-In, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Measurement Invariance of the WHODAS 2.0 in a Population-Based Sample of Youth
por: Kimber, Melissa, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease: measures of functioning in neuropsychiatric disease
por: Downing, Nancy R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

WHODAS 2.0-BO: normative data for the assessment of disability in older adults
por: Ferrer, Michele Lacerda Pereira, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
por: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

WHODAS 2.0 as a Measure of Severity of Illness: Results of a FLDA Analysis
por: Sedano-Capdevila, Alba, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

WHODAS 2.0 Can Predict Institutionalization among Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
por: Huang, Shih-Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population
por: Norén, Paulina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Predicting Institutionalization of Patients With Dementia in Taiwan
por: Huang, Shih-Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of the responsiveness of the WOMAC and the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin–Beck disease
por: Yang, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Using WHODAS 2.0 to Assess Functional Impairment in People with Depression: Should Employment Receive More Attention?
por: Chiang, Yu-Chen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Measurement of patient reported disability using WHODAS 2.0 before and after surgical intervention in Madagascar
por: White, Michelle C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of Three Quality of Life Instruments in Lymphatic Filariasis: DLQI, WHODAS 2.0, and LFSQQ
por: Thomas, Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
por: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders
por: Holmberg, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis
por: Bejer, Agnieszka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The psychometric properties and minimal clinically important difference for disability assessment using WHODAS 2.0 in critically ill patients
por: Higgins, Alisa M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a Functional Assessment Tool for Breast Cancer Survivors
por: Yang, Eun Joo, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Validation of the 36-item version of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for assessing women's disability and functioning associated with maternal morbidity
por: Silveira, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a chronic pain population being considered for chronic opioid therapy
por: Wawrzyniak, Kelly M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Health-related quality of life using WHODAS 2.0 and associated factors 1 year after stroke in Korea: a multi-centre and cross-sectional study
por: Lee, Hey Jean, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
por: Vaganian, Lusine, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparing Activity and Participation between Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal-Cord Injury in Community-Dwelling People with Severe Disability Using WHODAS 2.0
por: Yoon, Seo Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The impact of hypertension, hemorrhage, and other maternal morbidities on functioning in the postpartum period as assessed by the WHODAS 2.0 36‐item tool
por: Guida, José P., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Support for the higher-order factor structure of the WHODAS 2.0 self-report version in a Dutch outpatient psychiatric setting
por: Williams, Guido L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

WHODAS measurement properties for women with dysmenorrhea
por: de Arruda, Guilherme Tavares, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) amongst patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain
por: Katajapuu, Niina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Mapping the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) onto SF-6D Using Swedish General Population Data
por: Philipson, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Monitoring of Functioning Status in Subjects With Chronic Stroke in South Korea Using WHODAS II
por: Kwon, Su-Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

COT-03 EVALUATING FUNCTIONING AND DISABILITY OF A PATIENT WITH BRAIN TUMOR BY WHODAS
por: Ishita, Kohei, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation?
por: Galli, Tiziana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0): development and validation of the Nigerian Igbo version in patients with chronic low back pain
por: Igwesi-Chidobe, Chinonso Nwamaka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain
por: Wong, Jessica J., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item Arabic World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a screening tool for Syrian refugees
por: Akhtar, Aemal, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evidence for validity of the Swedish self-rated 36-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with mental disorders: a multi-centre cross-sectional study using Rasch analysis
por: Svanborg, Cecilia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Determinants of Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations among Breast Cancer Survivors in Korea
por: Shin, Woo-Kyoung, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reference ranges of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) score and diagnostic validity of its 12‐item version in identifying altered functioning in healthy postpartum women
por: Mayrink, Jussara, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Behavior in Female Cancer Survivors: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007–2012
por: Lee, Eun-Ae, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_e975sg86gqnhpa4ufaarrp1f9c