Cargando…

Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review

BACKGROUND: While enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) reduce physiologic stress and improve outcomes in general, their effects on postoperative renal function have not been directly studied. METHODS: Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery under ERP (February 2010 to March 2013) were compared wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horres, Charles R., Adam, Mohamed A., Sun, Zhifei, Thacker, Julie K., Moon, Richard E., Miller, Timothy E., Grant, Stuart A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28948012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-017-0069-0
_version_ 1783265540688576512
author Horres, Charles R.
Adam, Mohamed A.
Sun, Zhifei
Thacker, Julie K.
Moon, Richard E.
Miller, Timothy E.
Grant, Stuart A.
author_facet Horres, Charles R.
Adam, Mohamed A.
Sun, Zhifei
Thacker, Julie K.
Moon, Richard E.
Miller, Timothy E.
Grant, Stuart A.
author_sort Horres, Charles R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) reduce physiologic stress and improve outcomes in general, their effects on postoperative renal function have not been directly studied. METHODS: Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery under ERP (February 2010 to March 2013) were compared with a traditional care control group (October 2004 October 2007) at a single institution. Multivariable regression models examined the association of ERP with postoperative creatinine changes and incidence of postoperative acute kidney dysfunction (based on the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage renal disease criteria). RESULTS: Included were 1054 patients: 590 patients underwent surgery with ERP and 464 patients without ERP. Patient demographics were not significantly different. Higher rates of neoplastic and inflammatory bowel disease surgical indications were found in the ERP group (81 vs. 74%, p = 0.045). Patients in the ERP group had more comorbidities (ASA ≥ 3) (62 vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, postoperative creatinine increase was slightly higher in the ERP group compared with control (median 0.1 vs. 0 mg/dL, p < 0.001), but levels of postoperative acute kidney injury were similar in both groups (p = 0.998). After adjustment with multivariable regression, postoperative changes in creatinine were similar in ERP vs. control (p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: ERP in colorectal surgery is not associated with a clinically significant increase in postoperative creatinine or incidence of postoperative kidney injury. Our results support the safety of ERPs in colorectal surgery and may promote expanding implementation of these protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable, prospective data collection and retrospective chart review only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5609048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56090482017-09-25 Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review Horres, Charles R. Adam, Mohamed A. Sun, Zhifei Thacker, Julie K. Moon, Richard E. Miller, Timothy E. Grant, Stuart A. Perioper Med (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: While enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) reduce physiologic stress and improve outcomes in general, their effects on postoperative renal function have not been directly studied. METHODS: Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery under ERP (February 2010 to March 2013) were compared with a traditional care control group (October 2004 October 2007) at a single institution. Multivariable regression models examined the association of ERP with postoperative creatinine changes and incidence of postoperative acute kidney dysfunction (based on the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage renal disease criteria). RESULTS: Included were 1054 patients: 590 patients underwent surgery with ERP and 464 patients without ERP. Patient demographics were not significantly different. Higher rates of neoplastic and inflammatory bowel disease surgical indications were found in the ERP group (81 vs. 74%, p = 0.045). Patients in the ERP group had more comorbidities (ASA ≥ 3) (62 vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, postoperative creatinine increase was slightly higher in the ERP group compared with control (median 0.1 vs. 0 mg/dL, p < 0.001), but levels of postoperative acute kidney injury were similar in both groups (p = 0.998). After adjustment with multivariable regression, postoperative changes in creatinine were similar in ERP vs. control (p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: ERP in colorectal surgery is not associated with a clinically significant increase in postoperative creatinine or incidence of postoperative kidney injury. Our results support the safety of ERPs in colorectal surgery and may promote expanding implementation of these protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable, prospective data collection and retrospective chart review only. BioMed Central 2017-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5609048/ /pubmed/28948012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-017-0069-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Horres, Charles R.
Adam, Mohamed A.
Sun, Zhifei
Thacker, Julie K.
Moon, Richard E.
Miller, Timothy E.
Grant, Stuart A.
Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review
title Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review
title_full Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review
title_fullStr Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review
title_short Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review
title_sort enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28948012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-017-0069-0
work_keys_str_mv AT horrescharlesr enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview
AT adammohameda enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview
AT sunzhifei enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview
AT thackerjuliek enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview
AT moonricharde enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview
AT millertimothye enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview
AT grantstuarta enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview