Cargando…
Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review
BACKGROUND: While enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) reduce physiologic stress and improve outcomes in general, their effects on postoperative renal function have not been directly studied. METHODS: Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery under ERP (February 2010 to March 2013) were compared wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28948012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-017-0069-0 |
_version_ | 1783265540688576512 |
---|---|
author | Horres, Charles R. Adam, Mohamed A. Sun, Zhifei Thacker, Julie K. Moon, Richard E. Miller, Timothy E. Grant, Stuart A. |
author_facet | Horres, Charles R. Adam, Mohamed A. Sun, Zhifei Thacker, Julie K. Moon, Richard E. Miller, Timothy E. Grant, Stuart A. |
author_sort | Horres, Charles R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) reduce physiologic stress and improve outcomes in general, their effects on postoperative renal function have not been directly studied. METHODS: Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery under ERP (February 2010 to March 2013) were compared with a traditional care control group (October 2004 October 2007) at a single institution. Multivariable regression models examined the association of ERP with postoperative creatinine changes and incidence of postoperative acute kidney dysfunction (based on the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage renal disease criteria). RESULTS: Included were 1054 patients: 590 patients underwent surgery with ERP and 464 patients without ERP. Patient demographics were not significantly different. Higher rates of neoplastic and inflammatory bowel disease surgical indications were found in the ERP group (81 vs. 74%, p = 0.045). Patients in the ERP group had more comorbidities (ASA ≥ 3) (62 vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, postoperative creatinine increase was slightly higher in the ERP group compared with control (median 0.1 vs. 0 mg/dL, p < 0.001), but levels of postoperative acute kidney injury were similar in both groups (p = 0.998). After adjustment with multivariable regression, postoperative changes in creatinine were similar in ERP vs. control (p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: ERP in colorectal surgery is not associated with a clinically significant increase in postoperative creatinine or incidence of postoperative kidney injury. Our results support the safety of ERPs in colorectal surgery and may promote expanding implementation of these protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable, prospective data collection and retrospective chart review only. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5609048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56090482017-09-25 Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review Horres, Charles R. Adam, Mohamed A. Sun, Zhifei Thacker, Julie K. Moon, Richard E. Miller, Timothy E. Grant, Stuart A. Perioper Med (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: While enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) reduce physiologic stress and improve outcomes in general, their effects on postoperative renal function have not been directly studied. METHODS: Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery under ERP (February 2010 to March 2013) were compared with a traditional care control group (October 2004 October 2007) at a single institution. Multivariable regression models examined the association of ERP with postoperative creatinine changes and incidence of postoperative acute kidney dysfunction (based on the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage renal disease criteria). RESULTS: Included were 1054 patients: 590 patients underwent surgery with ERP and 464 patients without ERP. Patient demographics were not significantly different. Higher rates of neoplastic and inflammatory bowel disease surgical indications were found in the ERP group (81 vs. 74%, p = 0.045). Patients in the ERP group had more comorbidities (ASA ≥ 3) (62 vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, postoperative creatinine increase was slightly higher in the ERP group compared with control (median 0.1 vs. 0 mg/dL, p < 0.001), but levels of postoperative acute kidney injury were similar in both groups (p = 0.998). After adjustment with multivariable regression, postoperative changes in creatinine were similar in ERP vs. control (p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: ERP in colorectal surgery is not associated with a clinically significant increase in postoperative creatinine or incidence of postoperative kidney injury. Our results support the safety of ERPs in colorectal surgery and may promote expanding implementation of these protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable, prospective data collection and retrospective chart review only. BioMed Central 2017-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5609048/ /pubmed/28948012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-017-0069-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Horres, Charles R. Adam, Mohamed A. Sun, Zhifei Thacker, Julie K. Moon, Richard E. Miller, Timothy E. Grant, Stuart A. Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review |
title | Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review |
title_full | Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review |
title_fullStr | Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review |
title_short | Enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review |
title_sort | enhanced recovery protocols for colorectal surgery and postoperative renal function: a retrospective review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28948012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-017-0069-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horrescharlesr enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview AT adammohameda enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview AT sunzhifei enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview AT thackerjuliek enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview AT moonricharde enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview AT millertimothye enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview AT grantstuarta enhancedrecoveryprotocolsforcolorectalsurgeryandpostoperativerenalfunctionaretrospectivereview |