Cargando…

A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or Short CAM?

Background Prevalence studies show that 13%–42% of patients admitted to specialist palliative care inpatient units have delirium. Symptoms of delirium are often subtle and easily missed, or misdiagnosed as fatigue or depression, and so the use of a screening tool could improve early identification a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baird, Lucy, Spiller, Juliet Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28959786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000153
_version_ 1783265594511982592
author Baird, Lucy
Spiller, Juliet Anne
author_facet Baird, Lucy
Spiller, Juliet Anne
author_sort Baird, Lucy
collection PubMed
description Background Prevalence studies show that 13%–42% of patients admitted to specialist palliative care inpatient units have delirium. Symptoms of delirium are often subtle and easily missed, or misdiagnosed as fatigue or depression, and so the use of a screening tool could improve early identification and management of delirium and lead to improved outcomes. Patients admitted to hospices are often frail and tired, therefore a quick and easy-to-use method of cognitive assessment is essential. Methods A quality improvement (QI) approach (PDSA: Plan, Do, Study, Act) was used to improve screening for delirium on admission to a hospice unit. A baseline measure was taken of the rate of performance of cognitive assessment on admission. Five PDSA cycles were then undertaken which involved implementing change and then evaluating results through auditing case notes and interviewing staff. Results The first cycle determined staff preference between two cognitive assessment methods: the Short Confusion Assessment Method and the four ‘A’s Test (4AT). Two further PDSA cycles embedded the 4AT (the preferred tool) into the admission process, establishing it as a usable tool in the hospice setting for up to 92% of admissions. A subsequent cycle showing poor sustainability prompted staff education and changes to admission documentation, resulting in an increase in cognitive assessment being performed, from 50% to 76%. Conclusion The 4AT is a usable tool in the hospice inpatient setting to assess patients’ cognitive state on admission and can easily be incorporated into the admission process. The QI approach highlighted the need to link staff awareness of their use of the screening tool with perceived improvements in the treatment of delirium, which prompted the creation and implementation of a ‘Delirium Checklist’. Some initial lack of sustainability was addressed by staff education and changes to the admission paperwork to ensure compliance with the use of the 4AT and sustained improvement in screening for cognitive impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5609350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56093502017-09-28 A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or Short CAM? Baird, Lucy Spiller, Juliet Anne BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report Background Prevalence studies show that 13%–42% of patients admitted to specialist palliative care inpatient units have delirium. Symptoms of delirium are often subtle and easily missed, or misdiagnosed as fatigue or depression, and so the use of a screening tool could improve early identification and management of delirium and lead to improved outcomes. Patients admitted to hospices are often frail and tired, therefore a quick and easy-to-use method of cognitive assessment is essential. Methods A quality improvement (QI) approach (PDSA: Plan, Do, Study, Act) was used to improve screening for delirium on admission to a hospice unit. A baseline measure was taken of the rate of performance of cognitive assessment on admission. Five PDSA cycles were then undertaken which involved implementing change and then evaluating results through auditing case notes and interviewing staff. Results The first cycle determined staff preference between two cognitive assessment methods: the Short Confusion Assessment Method and the four ‘A’s Test (4AT). Two further PDSA cycles embedded the 4AT (the preferred tool) into the admission process, establishing it as a usable tool in the hospice setting for up to 92% of admissions. A subsequent cycle showing poor sustainability prompted staff education and changes to admission documentation, resulting in an increase in cognitive assessment being performed, from 50% to 76%. Conclusion The 4AT is a usable tool in the hospice inpatient setting to assess patients’ cognitive state on admission and can easily be incorporated into the admission process. The QI approach highlighted the need to link staff awareness of their use of the screening tool with perceived improvements in the treatment of delirium, which prompted the creation and implementation of a ‘Delirium Checklist’. Some initial lack of sustainability was addressed by staff education and changes to the admission paperwork to ensure compliance with the use of the 4AT and sustained improvement in screening for cognitive impairment. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5609350/ /pubmed/28959786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000153 Text en © Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Baird, Lucy
Spiller, Juliet Anne
A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or Short CAM?
title A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or Short CAM?
title_full A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or Short CAM?
title_fullStr A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or Short CAM?
title_full_unstemmed A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or Short CAM?
title_short A quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4AT or Short CAM?
title_sort quality improvement approach to cognitive assessment on hospice admission: could we use the 4at or short cam?
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28959786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000153
work_keys_str_mv AT bairdlucy aqualityimprovementapproachtocognitiveassessmentonhospiceadmissioncouldweusethe4atorshortcam
AT spillerjulietanne aqualityimprovementapproachtocognitiveassessmentonhospiceadmissioncouldweusethe4atorshortcam
AT bairdlucy qualityimprovementapproachtocognitiveassessmentonhospiceadmissioncouldweusethe4atorshortcam
AT spillerjulietanne qualityimprovementapproachtocognitiveassessmentonhospiceadmissioncouldweusethe4atorshortcam