Cargando…
Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: A Tale of Implementation and Review of Constraints
BACKGROUND: The first satellite center to offer interventional radiology procedures at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center opened in October 2014. Two of the procedures offered, fine needle aspirations and core biopsies, required rapid on-site cytologic evaluation of smears and biopsy touch impri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28966832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_26_17 |
_version_ | 1783265596674146304 |
---|---|
author | Sirintrapun, Sahussapont Joseph Rudomina, Dorota Mazzella, Allix Feratovic, Rusmir Alago, William Siegelbaum, Robert Lin, Oscar |
author_facet | Sirintrapun, Sahussapont Joseph Rudomina, Dorota Mazzella, Allix Feratovic, Rusmir Alago, William Siegelbaum, Robert Lin, Oscar |
author_sort | Sirintrapun, Sahussapont Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The first satellite center to offer interventional radiology procedures at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center opened in October 2014. Two of the procedures offered, fine needle aspirations and core biopsies, required rapid on-site cytologic evaluation of smears and biopsy touch imprints for cellular content and adequacy. The volume and frequency of such evaluations did not justify hiring on-site cytotechnologists, and therefore, a dynamic robotic telecytology (TC) solution was created. In this technical article, we present a detailed description of our implementation of robotic TC. METHODS: Pathology devised the remote robotic TC solution after acknowledging that it would not be cost effective to staff cytotechnologists on-site at the satellite location. Sakura VisionTek was selected as our robotic TC solution. In addition to configuration of the dynamic robotic TC solution, pathology realized integrating the technology solution into operations would require a multidisciplinary effort and reevaluation of existing staffing and workflows. RESULTS: Extensively described are the architectural framework and multidisciplinary process re-design, created to navigate the constraints of our technical, cultural, and organizational environment. Also reviewed are the benefits and challenges associated with available desktop sharing solutions, particularly accounting for information security concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic robotic TC is effective for immediate evaluations performed without on-site cytotechnology staff. Our goal is providing an extensive perspective of the implementation process, particularly technical, cultural, and operational constraints. Through this perspective, our template can serve as an extensible blueprint for other centers interested in implementing robotic TC without on-site cytotechnologists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5609359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56093592017-09-29 Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: A Tale of Implementation and Review of Constraints Sirintrapun, Sahussapont Joseph Rudomina, Dorota Mazzella, Allix Feratovic, Rusmir Alago, William Siegelbaum, Robert Lin, Oscar J Pathol Inform Technical Note BACKGROUND: The first satellite center to offer interventional radiology procedures at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center opened in October 2014. Two of the procedures offered, fine needle aspirations and core biopsies, required rapid on-site cytologic evaluation of smears and biopsy touch imprints for cellular content and adequacy. The volume and frequency of such evaluations did not justify hiring on-site cytotechnologists, and therefore, a dynamic robotic telecytology (TC) solution was created. In this technical article, we present a detailed description of our implementation of robotic TC. METHODS: Pathology devised the remote robotic TC solution after acknowledging that it would not be cost effective to staff cytotechnologists on-site at the satellite location. Sakura VisionTek was selected as our robotic TC solution. In addition to configuration of the dynamic robotic TC solution, pathology realized integrating the technology solution into operations would require a multidisciplinary effort and reevaluation of existing staffing and workflows. RESULTS: Extensively described are the architectural framework and multidisciplinary process re-design, created to navigate the constraints of our technical, cultural, and organizational environment. Also reviewed are the benefits and challenges associated with available desktop sharing solutions, particularly accounting for information security concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic robotic TC is effective for immediate evaluations performed without on-site cytotechnology staff. Our goal is providing an extensive perspective of the implementation process, particularly technical, cultural, and operational constraints. Through this perspective, our template can serve as an extensible blueprint for other centers interested in implementing robotic TC without on-site cytotechnologists. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5609359/ /pubmed/28966832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_26_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Pathology Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Sirintrapun, Sahussapont Joseph Rudomina, Dorota Mazzella, Allix Feratovic, Rusmir Alago, William Siegelbaum, Robert Lin, Oscar Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: A Tale of Implementation and Review of Constraints |
title | Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: A Tale of Implementation and Review of Constraints |
title_full | Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: A Tale of Implementation and Review of Constraints |
title_fullStr | Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: A Tale of Implementation and Review of Constraints |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: A Tale of Implementation and Review of Constraints |
title_short | Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: A Tale of Implementation and Review of Constraints |
title_sort | robotic telecytology for remote cytologic evaluation without an on-site cytotechnologist or cytopathologist: a tale of implementation and review of constraints |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28966832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_26_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sirintrapunsahussapontjoseph robotictelecytologyforremotecytologicevaluationwithoutanonsitecytotechnologistorcytopathologistataleofimplementationandreviewofconstraints AT rudominadorota robotictelecytologyforremotecytologicevaluationwithoutanonsitecytotechnologistorcytopathologistataleofimplementationandreviewofconstraints AT mazzellaallix robotictelecytologyforremotecytologicevaluationwithoutanonsitecytotechnologistorcytopathologistataleofimplementationandreviewofconstraints AT feratovicrusmir robotictelecytologyforremotecytologicevaluationwithoutanonsitecytotechnologistorcytopathologistataleofimplementationandreviewofconstraints AT alagowilliam robotictelecytologyforremotecytologicevaluationwithoutanonsitecytotechnologistorcytopathologistataleofimplementationandreviewofconstraints AT siegelbaumrobert robotictelecytologyforremotecytologicevaluationwithoutanonsitecytotechnologistorcytopathologistataleofimplementationandreviewofconstraints AT linoscar robotictelecytologyforremotecytologicevaluationwithoutanonsitecytotechnologistorcytopathologistataleofimplementationandreviewofconstraints |