Cargando…

Impact of Altering Various Image Parameters on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Image Analysis Data Quality

INTRODUCTION: The quality of data obtained from image analysis can be directly affected by several preanalytical (e.g., staining, image acquisition), analytical (e.g., algorithm, region of interest [ROI]), and postanalytical (e.g., computer processing) variables. Whole-slide scanners generate digita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pantanowitz, Liron, Liu, Chi, Huang, Yue, Guo, Huazhang, Rohde, Gustavo K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28966838
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_46_17
_version_ 1783265603892543488
author Pantanowitz, Liron
Liu, Chi
Huang, Yue
Guo, Huazhang
Rohde, Gustavo K.
author_facet Pantanowitz, Liron
Liu, Chi
Huang, Yue
Guo, Huazhang
Rohde, Gustavo K.
author_sort Pantanowitz, Liron
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The quality of data obtained from image analysis can be directly affected by several preanalytical (e.g., staining, image acquisition), analytical (e.g., algorithm, region of interest [ROI]), and postanalytical (e.g., computer processing) variables. Whole-slide scanners generate digital images that may vary depending on the type of scanner and device settings. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of altering brightness, contrast, compression, and blurring on image analysis data quality. METHODS: Slides from 55 patients with invasive breast carcinoma were digitized to include a spectrum of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) scores analyzed with Visiopharm (30 cases with score 0, 10 with 1+, 5 with 2+, and 10 with 3+). For all images, an ROI was selected and four parameters (brightness, contrast, JPEG2000 compression, out-of-focus blurring) then serially adjusted. HER2 scores were obtained for each altered image. RESULTS: HER2 scores decreased with increased illumination, higher compression ratios, and increased blurring. HER2 scores increased with greater contrast. Cases with HER2 score 0 were least affected by image adjustments. CONCLUSION: This experiment shows that variations in image brightness, contrast, compression, and blurring can have major influences on image analysis results. Such changes can result in under- or over-scoring with image algorithms. Standardization of image analysis is recommended to minimize the undesirable impact such variations may have on data output.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5609390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56093902017-09-29 Impact of Altering Various Image Parameters on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Image Analysis Data Quality Pantanowitz, Liron Liu, Chi Huang, Yue Guo, Huazhang Rohde, Gustavo K. J Pathol Inform Original Article INTRODUCTION: The quality of data obtained from image analysis can be directly affected by several preanalytical (e.g., staining, image acquisition), analytical (e.g., algorithm, region of interest [ROI]), and postanalytical (e.g., computer processing) variables. Whole-slide scanners generate digital images that may vary depending on the type of scanner and device settings. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of altering brightness, contrast, compression, and blurring on image analysis data quality. METHODS: Slides from 55 patients with invasive breast carcinoma were digitized to include a spectrum of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) scores analyzed with Visiopharm (30 cases with score 0, 10 with 1+, 5 with 2+, and 10 with 3+). For all images, an ROI was selected and four parameters (brightness, contrast, JPEG2000 compression, out-of-focus blurring) then serially adjusted. HER2 scores were obtained for each altered image. RESULTS: HER2 scores decreased with increased illumination, higher compression ratios, and increased blurring. HER2 scores increased with greater contrast. Cases with HER2 score 0 were least affected by image adjustments. CONCLUSION: This experiment shows that variations in image brightness, contrast, compression, and blurring can have major influences on image analysis results. Such changes can result in under- or over-scoring with image algorithms. Standardization of image analysis is recommended to minimize the undesirable impact such variations may have on data output. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5609390/ /pubmed/28966838 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_46_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Pathology Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pantanowitz, Liron
Liu, Chi
Huang, Yue
Guo, Huazhang
Rohde, Gustavo K.
Impact of Altering Various Image Parameters on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Image Analysis Data Quality
title Impact of Altering Various Image Parameters on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Image Analysis Data Quality
title_full Impact of Altering Various Image Parameters on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Image Analysis Data Quality
title_fullStr Impact of Altering Various Image Parameters on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Image Analysis Data Quality
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Altering Various Image Parameters on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Image Analysis Data Quality
title_short Impact of Altering Various Image Parameters on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Image Analysis Data Quality
title_sort impact of altering various image parameters on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 image analysis data quality
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28966838
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_46_17
work_keys_str_mv AT pantanowitzliron impactofalteringvariousimageparametersonhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2imageanalysisdataquality
AT liuchi impactofalteringvariousimageparametersonhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2imageanalysisdataquality
AT huangyue impactofalteringvariousimageparametersonhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2imageanalysisdataquality
AT guohuazhang impactofalteringvariousimageparametersonhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2imageanalysisdataquality
AT rohdegustavok impactofalteringvariousimageparametersonhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2imageanalysisdataquality