Cargando…

Hospitalization costs of severe bacterial pneumonia in children: comparative analysis considering different costing methods

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare hospitalization costs of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia cases via different costing methods under the Brazilian Public Unified Health System perspective. METHODS: Cost-of-illness study based on primary data collected from a sample of 59 children aged betwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nunes, Sheila Elke Araujo, Minamisava, Ruth, Vieira, Maria Aparecida da Silva, Itria, Alexander, Pessoa, Vicente Porfirio, de Andrade, Ana Lúcia Sampaio Sgambatti, Toscano, Cristiana Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28767921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082017GS3855
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare hospitalization costs of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia cases via different costing methods under the Brazilian Public Unified Health System perspective. METHODS: Cost-of-illness study based on primary data collected from a sample of 59 children aged between 28 days and 35 months and hospitalized due to bacterial pneumonia. Direct medical and non-medical costs were considered and three costing methods employed: micro-costing based on medical record review, micro-costing based on therapeutic guidelines and gross-costing based on the Brazilian Public Unified Health System reimbursement rates. Costs estimates obtained via different methods were compared using the Friedman test. RESULTS: Cost estimates of inpatient cases of severe pneumonia amounted to R$ 780,70/$Int. 858.7 (medical record review), R$ 641,90/$Int. 706.90 (therapeutic guidelines) and R$ 594,80/$Int. 654.28 (Brazilian Public Unified Health System reimbursement rates). Costs estimated via micro-costing (medical record review or therapeutic guidelines) did not differ significantly (p=0.405), while estimates based on reimbursement rates were significantly lower compared to estimates based on therapeutic guidelines (p<0.001) or record review (p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Brazilian Public Unified Health System costs estimated via different costing methods differ significantly, with gross-costing yielding lower cost estimates. Given costs estimated by different micro-costing methods are similar and costing methods based on therapeutic guidelines are easier to apply and less expensive, this method may be a valuable alternative for estimation of hospitalization costs of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in children.