Cargando…

Antimicrobial Peptides in Biomedical Device Manufacturing

Over the past decades the use of medical devices, such as catheters, artificial heart valves, prosthetic joints, and other implants, has grown significantly. Despite continuous improvements in device design, surgical procedures, and wound care, biomaterial-associated infections (BAI) are still a maj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riool, Martijn, de Breij, Anna, Drijfhout, Jan W., Nibbering, Peter H., Zaat, Sebastian A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2017.00063
_version_ 1783265648958242816
author Riool, Martijn
de Breij, Anna
Drijfhout, Jan W.
Nibbering, Peter H.
Zaat, Sebastian A. J.
author_facet Riool, Martijn
de Breij, Anna
Drijfhout, Jan W.
Nibbering, Peter H.
Zaat, Sebastian A. J.
author_sort Riool, Martijn
collection PubMed
description Over the past decades the use of medical devices, such as catheters, artificial heart valves, prosthetic joints, and other implants, has grown significantly. Despite continuous improvements in device design, surgical procedures, and wound care, biomaterial-associated infections (BAI) are still a major problem in modern medicine. Conventional antibiotic treatment often fails due to the low levels of antibiotic at the site of infection. The presence of biofilms on the biomaterial and/or the multidrug-resistant phenotype of the bacteria further impair the efficacy of antibiotic treatment. Removal of the biomaterial is then the last option to control the infection. Clearly, there is a pressing need for alternative strategies to prevent and treat BAI. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are considered promising candidates as they are active against a broad spectrum of (antibiotic-resistant) planktonic bacteria and biofilms. Moreover, bacteria are less likely to develop resistance to these rapidly-acting peptides. In this review we highlight the four main strategies, three of which applying AMPs, in biomedical device manufacturing to prevent BAI. The first involves modification of the physicochemical characteristics of the surface of implants. Immobilization of AMPs on surfaces of medical devices with a variety of chemical techniques is essential in the second strategy. The main disadvantage of these two strategies relates to the limited antibacterial effect in the tissue surrounding the implant. This limitation is addressed by the third strategy that releases AMPs from a coating in a controlled fashion. Lastly, AMPs can be integrated in the design and manufacturing of additively manufactured/3D-printed implants, owing to the physicochemical characteristics of the implant material and the versatile manufacturing technologies compatible with antimicrobials incorporation. These novel technologies utilizing AMPs will contribute to development of novel and safe antimicrobial medical devices, reducing complications and associated costs of device infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5609632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56096322017-10-02 Antimicrobial Peptides in Biomedical Device Manufacturing Riool, Martijn de Breij, Anna Drijfhout, Jan W. Nibbering, Peter H. Zaat, Sebastian A. J. Front Chem Chemistry Over the past decades the use of medical devices, such as catheters, artificial heart valves, prosthetic joints, and other implants, has grown significantly. Despite continuous improvements in device design, surgical procedures, and wound care, biomaterial-associated infections (BAI) are still a major problem in modern medicine. Conventional antibiotic treatment often fails due to the low levels of antibiotic at the site of infection. The presence of biofilms on the biomaterial and/or the multidrug-resistant phenotype of the bacteria further impair the efficacy of antibiotic treatment. Removal of the biomaterial is then the last option to control the infection. Clearly, there is a pressing need for alternative strategies to prevent and treat BAI. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are considered promising candidates as they are active against a broad spectrum of (antibiotic-resistant) planktonic bacteria and biofilms. Moreover, bacteria are less likely to develop resistance to these rapidly-acting peptides. In this review we highlight the four main strategies, three of which applying AMPs, in biomedical device manufacturing to prevent BAI. The first involves modification of the physicochemical characteristics of the surface of implants. Immobilization of AMPs on surfaces of medical devices with a variety of chemical techniques is essential in the second strategy. The main disadvantage of these two strategies relates to the limited antibacterial effect in the tissue surrounding the implant. This limitation is addressed by the third strategy that releases AMPs from a coating in a controlled fashion. Lastly, AMPs can be integrated in the design and manufacturing of additively manufactured/3D-printed implants, owing to the physicochemical characteristics of the implant material and the versatile manufacturing technologies compatible with antimicrobials incorporation. These novel technologies utilizing AMPs will contribute to development of novel and safe antimicrobial medical devices, reducing complications and associated costs of device infection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5609632/ /pubmed/28971093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2017.00063 Text en Copyright © 2017 Riool, de Breij, Drijfhout, Nibbering and Zaat. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Chemistry
Riool, Martijn
de Breij, Anna
Drijfhout, Jan W.
Nibbering, Peter H.
Zaat, Sebastian A. J.
Antimicrobial Peptides in Biomedical Device Manufacturing
title Antimicrobial Peptides in Biomedical Device Manufacturing
title_full Antimicrobial Peptides in Biomedical Device Manufacturing
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Peptides in Biomedical Device Manufacturing
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Peptides in Biomedical Device Manufacturing
title_short Antimicrobial Peptides in Biomedical Device Manufacturing
title_sort antimicrobial peptides in biomedical device manufacturing
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2017.00063
work_keys_str_mv AT rioolmartijn antimicrobialpeptidesinbiomedicaldevicemanufacturing
AT debreijanna antimicrobialpeptidesinbiomedicaldevicemanufacturing
AT drijfhoutjanw antimicrobialpeptidesinbiomedicaldevicemanufacturing
AT nibberingpeterh antimicrobialpeptidesinbiomedicaldevicemanufacturing
AT zaatsebastianaj antimicrobialpeptidesinbiomedicaldevicemanufacturing