Cargando…

Run Economy on a Normal and Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill

Lower body positive pressure (LBPP) treadmill running is used more frequently in clinical and athletic settings. Accurate caloric expenditure is required for proper exercise prescription, especially for obese patients performing LBPP exercise. It is unclear if running on LBPP changes running economy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: TEMPLE, COREY, LIND, ERIK, VAN LANGEN, DEBORAH, TRUE, LARISSA, HUPMAN, SAIGE, HOKANSON, JAMES F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28966714
_version_ 1783265654109896704
author TEMPLE, COREY
LIND, ERIK
VAN LANGEN, DEBORAH
TRUE, LARISSA
HUPMAN, SAIGE
HOKANSON, JAMES F.
author_facet TEMPLE, COREY
LIND, ERIK
VAN LANGEN, DEBORAH
TRUE, LARISSA
HUPMAN, SAIGE
HOKANSON, JAMES F.
author_sort TEMPLE, COREY
collection PubMed
description Lower body positive pressure (LBPP) treadmill running is used more frequently in clinical and athletic settings. Accurate caloric expenditure is required for proper exercise prescription, especially for obese patients performing LBPP exercise. It is unclear if running on LBPP changes running economy (RE) in proportion to the changes in body weight. The purpose of the study was to measure the oxygen consumption (VO(2)) and running economy (RE) of treadmill running at normal body weight and on LBPP. Twenty-three active, non-obese participants (25.8±7.2 years; BMI = 25.52±3.29 kg·m(−2)) completed two bouts of running exercise in a counterbalanced manner: (a) on a normal treadmill (NT) and (b) on a LBPP treadmill at 60% (40% of body weight supported) for 4 min at 2.24 (5 mph), 2.68 (6 mph), and 3.13 m·s(−1) (7 mph). Repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant interaction in RE among trials, F(2, 44) = 6.510, p <.0005, partial η(2) = 0.228. An examination of pairwise comparisons indicated that RE was significantly greater for LBPP across the three speeds (p < 0.005). As expected, LBPP treadmill running resulted in significantly lower oxygen consumption at all three running speeds. We conclude that RE (ml O(2)·kg(−1)·km(−1)) of LBPP running is significantly poorer than normal treadmill running, and the ~30% change in absolute energy cost is not as great as predicted by the change in body weight (40%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5609665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56096652017-09-27 Run Economy on a Normal and Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill TEMPLE, COREY LIND, ERIK VAN LANGEN, DEBORAH TRUE, LARISSA HUPMAN, SAIGE HOKANSON, JAMES F. Int J Exerc Sci Original Research Lower body positive pressure (LBPP) treadmill running is used more frequently in clinical and athletic settings. Accurate caloric expenditure is required for proper exercise prescription, especially for obese patients performing LBPP exercise. It is unclear if running on LBPP changes running economy (RE) in proportion to the changes in body weight. The purpose of the study was to measure the oxygen consumption (VO(2)) and running economy (RE) of treadmill running at normal body weight and on LBPP. Twenty-three active, non-obese participants (25.8±7.2 years; BMI = 25.52±3.29 kg·m(−2)) completed two bouts of running exercise in a counterbalanced manner: (a) on a normal treadmill (NT) and (b) on a LBPP treadmill at 60% (40% of body weight supported) for 4 min at 2.24 (5 mph), 2.68 (6 mph), and 3.13 m·s(−1) (7 mph). Repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant interaction in RE among trials, F(2, 44) = 6.510, p <.0005, partial η(2) = 0.228. An examination of pairwise comparisons indicated that RE was significantly greater for LBPP across the three speeds (p < 0.005). As expected, LBPP treadmill running resulted in significantly lower oxygen consumption at all three running speeds. We conclude that RE (ml O(2)·kg(−1)·km(−1)) of LBPP running is significantly poorer than normal treadmill running, and the ~30% change in absolute energy cost is not as great as predicted by the change in body weight (40%). Berkeley Electronic Press 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5609665/ /pubmed/28966714 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
TEMPLE, COREY
LIND, ERIK
VAN LANGEN, DEBORAH
TRUE, LARISSA
HUPMAN, SAIGE
HOKANSON, JAMES F.
Run Economy on a Normal and Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill
title Run Economy on a Normal and Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill
title_full Run Economy on a Normal and Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill
title_fullStr Run Economy on a Normal and Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill
title_full_unstemmed Run Economy on a Normal and Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill
title_short Run Economy on a Normal and Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill
title_sort run economy on a normal and lower body positive pressure treadmill
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28966714
work_keys_str_mv AT templecorey runeconomyonanormalandlowerbodypositivepressuretreadmill
AT linderik runeconomyonanormalandlowerbodypositivepressuretreadmill
AT vanlangendeborah runeconomyonanormalandlowerbodypositivepressuretreadmill
AT truelarissa runeconomyonanormalandlowerbodypositivepressuretreadmill
AT hupmansaige runeconomyonanormalandlowerbodypositivepressuretreadmill
AT hokansonjamesf runeconomyonanormalandlowerbodypositivepressuretreadmill