Cargando…

Molecular detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato – An analytical comparison of real-time PCR protocols from five different Scandinavian laboratories

INTRODUCTION: Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick transmitted disease in Europe. The diagnosis of LB today is based on the patient´s medical history, clinical presentation and laboratory findings. The laboratory diagnostics are mainly based on antibody detection, but in certain conditions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lager, Malin, Faller, Maximilian, Wilhelmsson, Peter, Kjelland, Vivian, Andreassen, Åshild, Dargis, Rimtas, Quarsten, Hanne, Dessau, Ram, Fingerle, Volker, Margos, Gabriele, Noraas, Sølvi, Ornstein, Katharina, Petersson, Ann-Cathrine, Matussek, Andreas, Lindgren, Per-Eric, Henningsson, Anna J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185434
_version_ 1783265664479264768
author Lager, Malin
Faller, Maximilian
Wilhelmsson, Peter
Kjelland, Vivian
Andreassen, Åshild
Dargis, Rimtas
Quarsten, Hanne
Dessau, Ram
Fingerle, Volker
Margos, Gabriele
Noraas, Sølvi
Ornstein, Katharina
Petersson, Ann-Cathrine
Matussek, Andreas
Lindgren, Per-Eric
Henningsson, Anna J.
author_facet Lager, Malin
Faller, Maximilian
Wilhelmsson, Peter
Kjelland, Vivian
Andreassen, Åshild
Dargis, Rimtas
Quarsten, Hanne
Dessau, Ram
Fingerle, Volker
Margos, Gabriele
Noraas, Sølvi
Ornstein, Katharina
Petersson, Ann-Cathrine
Matussek, Andreas
Lindgren, Per-Eric
Henningsson, Anna J.
author_sort Lager, Malin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick transmitted disease in Europe. The diagnosis of LB today is based on the patient´s medical history, clinical presentation and laboratory findings. The laboratory diagnostics are mainly based on antibody detection, but in certain conditions molecular detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may serve as a complement. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity and concordance of eight different real-time PCR methods at five laboratories in Sweden, Norway and Denmark. METHOD: Each participating laboratory was asked to analyse three different sets of samples (reference panels; all blinded) i) cDNA extracted and transcribed from water spiked with cultured Borrelia strains, ii) cerebrospinal fluid spiked with cultured Borrelia strains, and iii) DNA dilution series extracted from cultured Borrelia and relapsing fever strains. The results and the method descriptions of each laboratory were systematically evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The analytical sensitivities and the concordance between the eight protocols were in general high. The concordance was especially high between the protocols using 16S rRNA as the target gene, however, this concordance was mainly related to cDNA as the type of template. When comparing cDNA and DNA as the type of template the analytical sensitivity was in general higher for the protocols using DNA as template regardless of the use of target gene. The analytical specificity for all eight protocols was high. However, some protocols were not able to detect Borrelia spielmanii, Borrelia lusitaniae or Borrelia japonica.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5609768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56097682017-10-09 Molecular detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato – An analytical comparison of real-time PCR protocols from five different Scandinavian laboratories Lager, Malin Faller, Maximilian Wilhelmsson, Peter Kjelland, Vivian Andreassen, Åshild Dargis, Rimtas Quarsten, Hanne Dessau, Ram Fingerle, Volker Margos, Gabriele Noraas, Sølvi Ornstein, Katharina Petersson, Ann-Cathrine Matussek, Andreas Lindgren, Per-Eric Henningsson, Anna J. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick transmitted disease in Europe. The diagnosis of LB today is based on the patient´s medical history, clinical presentation and laboratory findings. The laboratory diagnostics are mainly based on antibody detection, but in certain conditions molecular detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may serve as a complement. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity and concordance of eight different real-time PCR methods at five laboratories in Sweden, Norway and Denmark. METHOD: Each participating laboratory was asked to analyse three different sets of samples (reference panels; all blinded) i) cDNA extracted and transcribed from water spiked with cultured Borrelia strains, ii) cerebrospinal fluid spiked with cultured Borrelia strains, and iii) DNA dilution series extracted from cultured Borrelia and relapsing fever strains. The results and the method descriptions of each laboratory were systematically evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The analytical sensitivities and the concordance between the eight protocols were in general high. The concordance was especially high between the protocols using 16S rRNA as the target gene, however, this concordance was mainly related to cDNA as the type of template. When comparing cDNA and DNA as the type of template the analytical sensitivity was in general higher for the protocols using DNA as template regardless of the use of target gene. The analytical specificity for all eight protocols was high. However, some protocols were not able to detect Borrelia spielmanii, Borrelia lusitaniae or Borrelia japonica. Public Library of Science 2017-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5609768/ /pubmed/28937997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185434 Text en © 2017 Lager et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lager, Malin
Faller, Maximilian
Wilhelmsson, Peter
Kjelland, Vivian
Andreassen, Åshild
Dargis, Rimtas
Quarsten, Hanne
Dessau, Ram
Fingerle, Volker
Margos, Gabriele
Noraas, Sølvi
Ornstein, Katharina
Petersson, Ann-Cathrine
Matussek, Andreas
Lindgren, Per-Eric
Henningsson, Anna J.
Molecular detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato – An analytical comparison of real-time PCR protocols from five different Scandinavian laboratories
title Molecular detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato – An analytical comparison of real-time PCR protocols from five different Scandinavian laboratories
title_full Molecular detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato – An analytical comparison of real-time PCR protocols from five different Scandinavian laboratories
title_fullStr Molecular detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato – An analytical comparison of real-time PCR protocols from five different Scandinavian laboratories
title_full_unstemmed Molecular detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato – An analytical comparison of real-time PCR protocols from five different Scandinavian laboratories
title_short Molecular detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato – An analytical comparison of real-time PCR protocols from five different Scandinavian laboratories
title_sort molecular detection of borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato – an analytical comparison of real-time pcr protocols from five different scandinavian laboratories
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185434
work_keys_str_mv AT lagermalin moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT fallermaximilian moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT wilhelmssonpeter moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT kjellandvivian moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT andreassenashild moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT dargisrimtas moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT quarstenhanne moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT dessauram moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT fingerlevolker moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT margosgabriele moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT noraassølvi moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT ornsteinkatharina moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT peterssonanncathrine moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT matussekandreas moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT lindgrenpereric moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories
AT henningssonannaj moleculardetectionofborreliaburgdorferisensulatoananalyticalcomparisonofrealtimepcrprotocolsfromfivedifferentscandinavianlaboratories