Cargando…

Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Robot-assisted hernia repair, combined with endoscopic component separation, has reduced recurrence and complication rates and allowed immediate intervention in obese patients. We sought to study surgical outcomes in this high-risk group of patients in a community hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oviedo, Rodolfo J., Robertson, Jarrod C., Desai, Apurva Sunder
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28951658
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00055
_version_ 1783265720168087552
author Oviedo, Rodolfo J.
Robertson, Jarrod C.
Desai, Apurva Sunder
author_facet Oviedo, Rodolfo J.
Robertson, Jarrod C.
Desai, Apurva Sunder
author_sort Oviedo, Rodolfo J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Robot-assisted hernia repair, combined with endoscopic component separation, has reduced recurrence and complication rates and allowed immediate intervention in obese patients. We sought to study surgical outcomes in this high-risk group of patients in a community hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of ventral, incisional, and umbilical hernia repairs performed at a small community hospital by a single surgeon from March 2014 through November 2016, with statistical analysis of the surgical outcomes. Patients included were those who underwent hernia repair during the study period and had a body mass index (BMI) >30. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months (range, 6–37). RESULTS: Forty-seven hernia repairs were performed, including 33 combined and 14 control cases. The demographics of each group were comparable when comparing sex, age, BMI, and ASA classification. Mean follow-up was 19.39 months in the study group and 28.64 months in the control group. There were no significant differences in total operative time, estimated blood loss, conversion rates, or hospital length of stay. Two complications occurred in each of the study and control groups, with no recurrences in the study group and 3 in the control group and no mortalities. CONCLUSION: Robotic laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall defects offers significant advantages, including easier primary defect closure. Our analyses showed that combining robot-assisted hernia repair with mesh and endoscopic component separation is an effective intervention in obese patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5610118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56101182017-09-26 Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes Oviedo, Rodolfo J. Robertson, Jarrod C. Desai, Apurva Sunder JSLS Scientific Paper BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Robot-assisted hernia repair, combined with endoscopic component separation, has reduced recurrence and complication rates and allowed immediate intervention in obese patients. We sought to study surgical outcomes in this high-risk group of patients in a community hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of ventral, incisional, and umbilical hernia repairs performed at a small community hospital by a single surgeon from March 2014 through November 2016, with statistical analysis of the surgical outcomes. Patients included were those who underwent hernia repair during the study period and had a body mass index (BMI) >30. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months (range, 6–37). RESULTS: Forty-seven hernia repairs were performed, including 33 combined and 14 control cases. The demographics of each group were comparable when comparing sex, age, BMI, and ASA classification. Mean follow-up was 19.39 months in the study group and 28.64 months in the control group. There were no significant differences in total operative time, estimated blood loss, conversion rates, or hospital length of stay. Two complications occurred in each of the study and control groups, with no recurrences in the study group and 3 in the control group and no mortalities. CONCLUSION: Robotic laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall defects offers significant advantages, including easier primary defect closure. Our analyses showed that combining robot-assisted hernia repair with mesh and endoscopic component separation is an effective intervention in obese patients. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5610118/ /pubmed/28951658 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00055 Text en © 2017 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Paper
Oviedo, Rodolfo J.
Robertson, Jarrod C.
Desai, Apurva Sunder
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes
title Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes
title_full Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes
title_fullStr Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes
title_short Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes
title_sort robotic ventral hernia repair and endoscopic component separation: outcomes
topic Scientific Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28951658
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00055
work_keys_str_mv AT oviedorodolfoj roboticventralherniarepairandendoscopiccomponentseparationoutcomes
AT robertsonjarrodc roboticventralherniarepairandendoscopiccomponentseparationoutcomes
AT desaiapurvasunder roboticventralherniarepairandendoscopiccomponentseparationoutcomes