Cargando…
Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method
BACKGROUND: In childbirth, most deliveries are low-risk, defined as spontaneous labor at full term without special high-risk facts or complications, especially in high-resource countries where maternal and perinatal mortality rates are very low. Indeed, the majority of mothers and infants have no se...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28938879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1468-4 |
_version_ | 1783265783365763072 |
---|---|
author | Ueda, Kayo Ohtera, Shosuke Kaso, Misato Nakayama, Takeo |
author_facet | Ueda, Kayo Ohtera, Shosuke Kaso, Misato Nakayama, Takeo |
author_sort | Ueda, Kayo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In childbirth, most deliveries are low-risk, defined as spontaneous labor at full term without special high-risk facts or complications, especially in high-resource countries where maternal and perinatal mortality rates are very low. Indeed, the majority of mothers and infants have no serious conditions during labor. However, the quality of care provided is not assured, and performance may vary by birthing facility and provider. The overuse of technology in childbirth in some parts of the world is almost certainly based on assumptions like, “something can go wrong at any minute.” There is a need to assess the quality of care provided for mothers and infants in low-risk labor. We aimed to develop specific quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided primarily by midwives in Japan. METHODS: We used a RAND-modified Delphi method, which integrates evidence review with expert consensus development. The procedure comprises five steps: (1) literature review, including clinical practice guidelines, to extract and develop quality indicator candidates; (2) formation of a multidisciplinary panel; (3) independent panel ratings (Round 1); (4) panel meeting and independent panel ratings (Round 2); and (5) independent panel ratings (Round 3). The three independent panel ratings (Rounds 1–3) were held between July and December 2012. RESULTS: The assembled multidisciplinary panel comprised eight clinicians (two pediatricians, three obstetricians, and three midwives) and three mothers who were nonclinicians. Evidentiary review extracted 166 key recommendations from 32 clinical practice guidelines, and 31 existing quality indicators were added. After excluding duplicate recommendations and quality indicators, the panel discussed 25 candidate indicators. Of these, 18 were adopted, one was modified, six were not adopted, and four were added during the meeting, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We established 23 quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives in labor units in Japan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5610460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56104602017-10-10 Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method Ueda, Kayo Ohtera, Shosuke Kaso, Misato Nakayama, Takeo BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: In childbirth, most deliveries are low-risk, defined as spontaneous labor at full term without special high-risk facts or complications, especially in high-resource countries where maternal and perinatal mortality rates are very low. Indeed, the majority of mothers and infants have no serious conditions during labor. However, the quality of care provided is not assured, and performance may vary by birthing facility and provider. The overuse of technology in childbirth in some parts of the world is almost certainly based on assumptions like, “something can go wrong at any minute.” There is a need to assess the quality of care provided for mothers and infants in low-risk labor. We aimed to develop specific quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided primarily by midwives in Japan. METHODS: We used a RAND-modified Delphi method, which integrates evidence review with expert consensus development. The procedure comprises five steps: (1) literature review, including clinical practice guidelines, to extract and develop quality indicator candidates; (2) formation of a multidisciplinary panel; (3) independent panel ratings (Round 1); (4) panel meeting and independent panel ratings (Round 2); and (5) independent panel ratings (Round 3). The three independent panel ratings (Rounds 1–3) were held between July and December 2012. RESULTS: The assembled multidisciplinary panel comprised eight clinicians (two pediatricians, three obstetricians, and three midwives) and three mothers who were nonclinicians. Evidentiary review extracted 166 key recommendations from 32 clinical practice guidelines, and 31 existing quality indicators were added. After excluding duplicate recommendations and quality indicators, the panel discussed 25 candidate indicators. Of these, 18 were adopted, one was modified, six were not adopted, and four were added during the meeting, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We established 23 quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives in labor units in Japan. BioMed Central 2017-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5610460/ /pubmed/28938879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1468-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ueda, Kayo Ohtera, Shosuke Kaso, Misato Nakayama, Takeo Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method |
title | Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method |
title_full | Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method |
title_fullStr | Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method |
title_short | Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method |
title_sort | development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a rand-modified delphi method |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28938879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1468-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uedakayo developmentofqualityindicatorsforlowrisklaborcareprovidedbymidwivesusingarandmodifieddelphimethod AT ohterashosuke developmentofqualityindicatorsforlowrisklaborcareprovidedbymidwivesusingarandmodifieddelphimethod AT kasomisato developmentofqualityindicatorsforlowrisklaborcareprovidedbymidwivesusingarandmodifieddelphimethod AT nakayamatakeo developmentofqualityindicatorsforlowrisklaborcareprovidedbymidwivesusingarandmodifieddelphimethod |