Cargando…

Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method

BACKGROUND: In childbirth, most deliveries are low-risk, defined as spontaneous labor at full term without special high-risk facts or complications, especially in high-resource countries where maternal and perinatal mortality rates are very low. Indeed, the majority of mothers and infants have no se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ueda, Kayo, Ohtera, Shosuke, Kaso, Misato, Nakayama, Takeo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28938879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1468-4
_version_ 1783265783365763072
author Ueda, Kayo
Ohtera, Shosuke
Kaso, Misato
Nakayama, Takeo
author_facet Ueda, Kayo
Ohtera, Shosuke
Kaso, Misato
Nakayama, Takeo
author_sort Ueda, Kayo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In childbirth, most deliveries are low-risk, defined as spontaneous labor at full term without special high-risk facts or complications, especially in high-resource countries where maternal and perinatal mortality rates are very low. Indeed, the majority of mothers and infants have no serious conditions during labor. However, the quality of care provided is not assured, and performance may vary by birthing facility and provider. The overuse of technology in childbirth in some parts of the world is almost certainly based on assumptions like, “something can go wrong at any minute.” There is a need to assess the quality of care provided for mothers and infants in low-risk labor. We aimed to develop specific quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided primarily by midwives in Japan. METHODS: We used a RAND-modified Delphi method, which integrates evidence review with expert consensus development. The procedure comprises five steps: (1) literature review, including clinical practice guidelines, to extract and develop quality indicator candidates; (2) formation of a multidisciplinary panel; (3) independent panel ratings (Round 1); (4) panel meeting and independent panel ratings (Round 2); and (5) independent panel ratings (Round 3). The three independent panel ratings (Rounds 1–3) were held between July and December 2012. RESULTS: The assembled multidisciplinary panel comprised eight clinicians (two pediatricians, three obstetricians, and three midwives) and three mothers who were nonclinicians. Evidentiary review extracted 166 key recommendations from 32 clinical practice guidelines, and 31 existing quality indicators were added. After excluding duplicate recommendations and quality indicators, the panel discussed 25 candidate indicators. Of these, 18 were adopted, one was modified, six were not adopted, and four were added during the meeting, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We established 23 quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives in labor units in Japan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5610460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56104602017-10-10 Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method Ueda, Kayo Ohtera, Shosuke Kaso, Misato Nakayama, Takeo BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: In childbirth, most deliveries are low-risk, defined as spontaneous labor at full term without special high-risk facts or complications, especially in high-resource countries where maternal and perinatal mortality rates are very low. Indeed, the majority of mothers and infants have no serious conditions during labor. However, the quality of care provided is not assured, and performance may vary by birthing facility and provider. The overuse of technology in childbirth in some parts of the world is almost certainly based on assumptions like, “something can go wrong at any minute.” There is a need to assess the quality of care provided for mothers and infants in low-risk labor. We aimed to develop specific quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided primarily by midwives in Japan. METHODS: We used a RAND-modified Delphi method, which integrates evidence review with expert consensus development. The procedure comprises five steps: (1) literature review, including clinical practice guidelines, to extract and develop quality indicator candidates; (2) formation of a multidisciplinary panel; (3) independent panel ratings (Round 1); (4) panel meeting and independent panel ratings (Round 2); and (5) independent panel ratings (Round 3). The three independent panel ratings (Rounds 1–3) were held between July and December 2012. RESULTS: The assembled multidisciplinary panel comprised eight clinicians (two pediatricians, three obstetricians, and three midwives) and three mothers who were nonclinicians. Evidentiary review extracted 166 key recommendations from 32 clinical practice guidelines, and 31 existing quality indicators were added. After excluding duplicate recommendations and quality indicators, the panel discussed 25 candidate indicators. Of these, 18 were adopted, one was modified, six were not adopted, and four were added during the meeting, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We established 23 quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives in labor units in Japan. BioMed Central 2017-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5610460/ /pubmed/28938879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1468-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ueda, Kayo
Ohtera, Shosuke
Kaso, Misato
Nakayama, Takeo
Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method
title Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method
title_full Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method
title_fullStr Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method
title_full_unstemmed Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method
title_short Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method
title_sort development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a rand-modified delphi method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28938879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1468-4
work_keys_str_mv AT uedakayo developmentofqualityindicatorsforlowrisklaborcareprovidedbymidwivesusingarandmodifieddelphimethod
AT ohterashosuke developmentofqualityindicatorsforlowrisklaborcareprovidedbymidwivesusingarandmodifieddelphimethod
AT kasomisato developmentofqualityindicatorsforlowrisklaborcareprovidedbymidwivesusingarandmodifieddelphimethod
AT nakayamatakeo developmentofqualityindicatorsforlowrisklaborcareprovidedbymidwivesusingarandmodifieddelphimethod