Cargando…

Glibenclamide and metfoRmin versus stAndard care in gEstational diabeteS (GRACES): a feasibility open label randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Metformin is widely used to treat gestational diabetes (GDM), but many women remain hyperglycaemic and require additional therapy. We aimed to determine recruitment rate and participant throughput in a randomised trial of glibenclamide compared with standard therapy insulin (added to max...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reynolds, Rebecca M., Denison, Fiona C., Juszczak, Ed, Bell, Jennifer L., Penneycard, Jessica, Strachan, Mark W. J., Lindsay, Robert S., Alexander, Claire I., Love, Corinne D. B., Whyte, Sonia, Mackenzie, Fiona, Stenson, Ben, Norman, Jane E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28938877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1505-3
_version_ 1783265785781682176
author Reynolds, Rebecca M.
Denison, Fiona C.
Juszczak, Ed
Bell, Jennifer L.
Penneycard, Jessica
Strachan, Mark W. J.
Lindsay, Robert S.
Alexander, Claire I.
Love, Corinne D. B.
Whyte, Sonia
Mackenzie, Fiona
Stenson, Ben
Norman, Jane E.
author_facet Reynolds, Rebecca M.
Denison, Fiona C.
Juszczak, Ed
Bell, Jennifer L.
Penneycard, Jessica
Strachan, Mark W. J.
Lindsay, Robert S.
Alexander, Claire I.
Love, Corinne D. B.
Whyte, Sonia
Mackenzie, Fiona
Stenson, Ben
Norman, Jane E.
author_sort Reynolds, Rebecca M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metformin is widely used to treat gestational diabetes (GDM), but many women remain hyperglycaemic and require additional therapy. We aimed to determine recruitment rate and participant throughput in a randomised trial of glibenclamide compared with standard therapy insulin (added to maximum tolerated metformin) for treatment of GDM. METHODS: We conducted an open label feasibility study in 5 UK antenatal clinics among pregnant women 16 to 36 weeks’ gestation with metformin-treated GDM. Women failing to achieve adequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy were randomised to additional glibenclamide or insulin. The primary outcome was recruitment rate. We explored feasibility with uptake, retention, adherence, safety, glycaemic control, participant satisfaction and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Records of 197 women were screened and 23 women randomised to metformin and glibenclamide (n = 13) or metformin and insulin (n = 10). Mean (SD) recruitment rate was 0.39 (0.62) women/centre/month. 9/13 (69.2%, 95%CI 38.6–90.9%) women adhered to glibenclamide and all provided outcome data (100% retention). There were no episodes of severe hypoglycaemia, but metformin and insulin gave superior glycaemic control to metformin and glibenclamide, with fewer blood glucose readings <3.5 mmol/l (median [IQR] difference/woman/week of treatment 0.58 [0.03–1.87]). CONCLUSIONS: A large randomised controlled trial comparing glibenclamide or insulin in combination with metformin for women with GDM would be feasible but is unlikely to be worthwhile, given the poorer glycaemic control with glibenclamide and metformin in this pilot study. The combination of metformin and glibenclamide should be reserved for women with GDM with true needle phobia or inability to use insulin therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov registration number:NCT02080377 February 11th 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1505-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5610470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56104702017-10-10 Glibenclamide and metfoRmin versus stAndard care in gEstational diabeteS (GRACES): a feasibility open label randomised trial Reynolds, Rebecca M. Denison, Fiona C. Juszczak, Ed Bell, Jennifer L. Penneycard, Jessica Strachan, Mark W. J. Lindsay, Robert S. Alexander, Claire I. Love, Corinne D. B. Whyte, Sonia Mackenzie, Fiona Stenson, Ben Norman, Jane E. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Metformin is widely used to treat gestational diabetes (GDM), but many women remain hyperglycaemic and require additional therapy. We aimed to determine recruitment rate and participant throughput in a randomised trial of glibenclamide compared with standard therapy insulin (added to maximum tolerated metformin) for treatment of GDM. METHODS: We conducted an open label feasibility study in 5 UK antenatal clinics among pregnant women 16 to 36 weeks’ gestation with metformin-treated GDM. Women failing to achieve adequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy were randomised to additional glibenclamide or insulin. The primary outcome was recruitment rate. We explored feasibility with uptake, retention, adherence, safety, glycaemic control, participant satisfaction and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Records of 197 women were screened and 23 women randomised to metformin and glibenclamide (n = 13) or metformin and insulin (n = 10). Mean (SD) recruitment rate was 0.39 (0.62) women/centre/month. 9/13 (69.2%, 95%CI 38.6–90.9%) women adhered to glibenclamide and all provided outcome data (100% retention). There were no episodes of severe hypoglycaemia, but metformin and insulin gave superior glycaemic control to metformin and glibenclamide, with fewer blood glucose readings <3.5 mmol/l (median [IQR] difference/woman/week of treatment 0.58 [0.03–1.87]). CONCLUSIONS: A large randomised controlled trial comparing glibenclamide or insulin in combination with metformin for women with GDM would be feasible but is unlikely to be worthwhile, given the poorer glycaemic control with glibenclamide and metformin in this pilot study. The combination of metformin and glibenclamide should be reserved for women with GDM with true needle phobia or inability to use insulin therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov registration number:NCT02080377 February 11th 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1505-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5610470/ /pubmed/28938877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1505-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reynolds, Rebecca M.
Denison, Fiona C.
Juszczak, Ed
Bell, Jennifer L.
Penneycard, Jessica
Strachan, Mark W. J.
Lindsay, Robert S.
Alexander, Claire I.
Love, Corinne D. B.
Whyte, Sonia
Mackenzie, Fiona
Stenson, Ben
Norman, Jane E.
Glibenclamide and metfoRmin versus stAndard care in gEstational diabeteS (GRACES): a feasibility open label randomised trial
title Glibenclamide and metfoRmin versus stAndard care in gEstational diabeteS (GRACES): a feasibility open label randomised trial
title_full Glibenclamide and metfoRmin versus stAndard care in gEstational diabeteS (GRACES): a feasibility open label randomised trial
title_fullStr Glibenclamide and metfoRmin versus stAndard care in gEstational diabeteS (GRACES): a feasibility open label randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Glibenclamide and metfoRmin versus stAndard care in gEstational diabeteS (GRACES): a feasibility open label randomised trial
title_short Glibenclamide and metfoRmin versus stAndard care in gEstational diabeteS (GRACES): a feasibility open label randomised trial
title_sort glibenclamide and metformin versus standard care in gestational diabetes (graces): a feasibility open label randomised trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28938877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1505-3
work_keys_str_mv AT reynoldsrebeccam glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT denisonfionac glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT juszczaked glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT belljenniferl glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT penneycardjessica glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT strachanmarkwj glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT lindsayroberts glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT alexanderclairei glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT lovecorinnedb glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT whytesonia glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT mackenziefiona glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT stensonben glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial
AT normanjanee glibenclamideandmetforminversusstandardcareingestationaldiabetesgracesafeasibilityopenlabelrandomisedtrial