Cargando…

Effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers

PURPOSE: This study examined the effectiveness, feasibility, and satisfaction with implementation of the FOCUS program in two US Cancer Support Community affiliates in Ohio and California as well as the cost to deliver the program. FOCUS is an evidence-based psychoeducational intervention for dyads...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Titler, Marita G., Visovatti, Moira A., Shuman, Clayton, Ellis, Katrina R., Banerjee, Tanima, Dockham, Bonnie, Yakusheva, Olga, Northouse, Laurel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28612157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3758-9
_version_ 1783265798168510464
author Titler, Marita G.
Visovatti, Moira A.
Shuman, Clayton
Ellis, Katrina R.
Banerjee, Tanima
Dockham, Bonnie
Yakusheva, Olga
Northouse, Laurel
author_facet Titler, Marita G.
Visovatti, Moira A.
Shuman, Clayton
Ellis, Katrina R.
Banerjee, Tanima
Dockham, Bonnie
Yakusheva, Olga
Northouse, Laurel
author_sort Titler, Marita G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study examined the effectiveness, feasibility, and satisfaction with implementation of the FOCUS program in two US Cancer Support Community affiliates in Ohio and California as well as the cost to deliver the program. FOCUS is an evidence-based psychoeducational intervention for dyads (cancer patients and caregivers). METHODS: A pre-post-intervention design was employed. Eleven, five-session Focus programs were delivered by licensed professionals in a small group format (three–four dyads/group) to 36 patient-caregiver dyads. An Implementation Training Manual, a FOCUS Intervention Protocol Manual, and weekly conference calls were used to foster implementation. Participants completed questionnaires prior to and following completion of each five-session FOCUS program to measure primary (emotional distress, quality of life) and secondary outcomes (benefits of illness, self-efficacy, and dyadic communication). Enrollment and retention rates and fidelity to FOCUS were used to measure feasibility. Cost estimates were based on time and median hourly wages. Repeated analysis of variance was used to analyze the effect of FOCUS on outcomes for dyads. Descriptive statistics were used to examine feasibility, satisfaction, and cost estimates. RESULTS: FOCUS had positive effects on QOL (p = .014), emotional (p = .012), and functional (p = .049) well-being, emotional distress (p = .002), benefits of illness (p = .013), and self-efficacy (p = .001). Intervention fidelity was 85% with enrollment and retention rates of 71.4 and 90%, respectively. Participants were highly satisfied. Cost for oversight and delivery of the five-session FOCUS program was $168.00 per dyad. CONCLUSIONS: FOCUS is an economic and effective intervention to decrease distress and improve the quality of life for dyads.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5610667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56106672017-10-10 Effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers Titler, Marita G. Visovatti, Moira A. Shuman, Clayton Ellis, Katrina R. Banerjee, Tanima Dockham, Bonnie Yakusheva, Olga Northouse, Laurel Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: This study examined the effectiveness, feasibility, and satisfaction with implementation of the FOCUS program in two US Cancer Support Community affiliates in Ohio and California as well as the cost to deliver the program. FOCUS is an evidence-based psychoeducational intervention for dyads (cancer patients and caregivers). METHODS: A pre-post-intervention design was employed. Eleven, five-session Focus programs were delivered by licensed professionals in a small group format (three–four dyads/group) to 36 patient-caregiver dyads. An Implementation Training Manual, a FOCUS Intervention Protocol Manual, and weekly conference calls were used to foster implementation. Participants completed questionnaires prior to and following completion of each five-session FOCUS program to measure primary (emotional distress, quality of life) and secondary outcomes (benefits of illness, self-efficacy, and dyadic communication). Enrollment and retention rates and fidelity to FOCUS were used to measure feasibility. Cost estimates were based on time and median hourly wages. Repeated analysis of variance was used to analyze the effect of FOCUS on outcomes for dyads. Descriptive statistics were used to examine feasibility, satisfaction, and cost estimates. RESULTS: FOCUS had positive effects on QOL (p = .014), emotional (p = .012), and functional (p = .049) well-being, emotional distress (p = .002), benefits of illness (p = .013), and self-efficacy (p = .001). Intervention fidelity was 85% with enrollment and retention rates of 71.4 and 90%, respectively. Participants were highly satisfied. Cost for oversight and delivery of the five-session FOCUS program was $168.00 per dyad. CONCLUSIONS: FOCUS is an economic and effective intervention to decrease distress and improve the quality of life for dyads. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-06-13 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5610667/ /pubmed/28612157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3758-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Titler, Marita G.
Visovatti, Moira A.
Shuman, Clayton
Ellis, Katrina R.
Banerjee, Tanima
Dockham, Bonnie
Yakusheva, Olga
Northouse, Laurel
Effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers
title Effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers
title_full Effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers
title_fullStr Effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers
title_short Effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers
title_sort effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28612157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3758-9
work_keys_str_mv AT titlermaritag effectivenessofimplementingadyadicpsychoeducationalinterventionforcancerpatientsandfamilycaregivers
AT visovattimoiraa effectivenessofimplementingadyadicpsychoeducationalinterventionforcancerpatientsandfamilycaregivers
AT shumanclayton effectivenessofimplementingadyadicpsychoeducationalinterventionforcancerpatientsandfamilycaregivers
AT elliskatrinar effectivenessofimplementingadyadicpsychoeducationalinterventionforcancerpatientsandfamilycaregivers
AT banerjeetanima effectivenessofimplementingadyadicpsychoeducationalinterventionforcancerpatientsandfamilycaregivers
AT dockhambonnie effectivenessofimplementingadyadicpsychoeducationalinterventionforcancerpatientsandfamilycaregivers
AT yakushevaolga effectivenessofimplementingadyadicpsychoeducationalinterventionforcancerpatientsandfamilycaregivers
AT northouselaurel effectivenessofimplementingadyadicpsychoeducationalinterventionforcancerpatientsandfamilycaregivers