Cargando…

Accommodative Stimulus-Response Curve with Emoji Symbols

PURPOSE: To evaluate the static measurement of the accommodative stimulus-response curve with emoji symbols. METHODS: The accommodative stimulus-response curve was measured in 18 subjects using a Hartmann-Shack sensor to obtain the objective accommodative response from the Zernike defocus term. Meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montés-Micó, Robert, Esteve Taboada, José J., Bernal-Molina, Paula, Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29082040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4165706
_version_ 1783265846511009792
author Montés-Micó, Robert
Esteve Taboada, José J.
Bernal-Molina, Paula
Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
author_facet Montés-Micó, Robert
Esteve Taboada, José J.
Bernal-Molina, Paula
Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
author_sort Montés-Micó, Robert
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the static measurement of the accommodative stimulus-response curve with emoji symbols. METHODS: The accommodative stimulus-response curve was measured in 18 subjects using a Hartmann-Shack sensor to obtain the objective accommodative response from the Zernike defocus term. Measurements were acquired at different accommodative demands, from 0 to 3 D with a step of 0.5 D. Detailed and nondetailed emoji targets were used with two different sizes, corresponding to the two most common visual angles used in smartphones. RESULTS: A regression analysis was performed to fit the mean results obtained for each target. The determination coefficient was R(2) ≥ 0.988 for all targets. For the detailed targets, the slopes for the averaged stimulus-response curve were 0.65 and 0.66 for the bigger and smaller sizes, respectively. For the nondetailed targets, the slopes were 0.60 and 0.58 for the bigger and smaller sizes, respectively. p values for these slopes were statistically significant for the two types of targets (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal that the replacement of a word or several words by detailed or nondetailed emoji symbols seems not to provoke a different accommodative response in normal subjects and under standard viewing conditions in the use of smartphones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5610885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56108852017-10-29 Accommodative Stimulus-Response Curve with Emoji Symbols Montés-Micó, Robert Esteve Taboada, José J. Bernal-Molina, Paula Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the static measurement of the accommodative stimulus-response curve with emoji symbols. METHODS: The accommodative stimulus-response curve was measured in 18 subjects using a Hartmann-Shack sensor to obtain the objective accommodative response from the Zernike defocus term. Measurements were acquired at different accommodative demands, from 0 to 3 D with a step of 0.5 D. Detailed and nondetailed emoji targets were used with two different sizes, corresponding to the two most common visual angles used in smartphones. RESULTS: A regression analysis was performed to fit the mean results obtained for each target. The determination coefficient was R(2) ≥ 0.988 for all targets. For the detailed targets, the slopes for the averaged stimulus-response curve were 0.65 and 0.66 for the bigger and smaller sizes, respectively. For the nondetailed targets, the slopes were 0.60 and 0.58 for the bigger and smaller sizes, respectively. p values for these slopes were statistically significant for the two types of targets (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal that the replacement of a word or several words by detailed or nondetailed emoji symbols seems not to provoke a different accommodative response in normal subjects and under standard viewing conditions in the use of smartphones. Hindawi 2017 2017-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5610885/ /pubmed/29082040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4165706 Text en Copyright © 2017 Robert Montés-Micó et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Montés-Micó, Robert
Esteve Taboada, José J.
Bernal-Molina, Paula
Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
Accommodative Stimulus-Response Curve with Emoji Symbols
title Accommodative Stimulus-Response Curve with Emoji Symbols
title_full Accommodative Stimulus-Response Curve with Emoji Symbols
title_fullStr Accommodative Stimulus-Response Curve with Emoji Symbols
title_full_unstemmed Accommodative Stimulus-Response Curve with Emoji Symbols
title_short Accommodative Stimulus-Response Curve with Emoji Symbols
title_sort accommodative stimulus-response curve with emoji symbols
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29082040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4165706
work_keys_str_mv AT montesmicorobert accommodativestimulusresponsecurvewithemojisymbols
AT estevetaboadajosej accommodativestimulusresponsecurvewithemojisymbols
AT bernalmolinapaula accommodativestimulusresponsecurvewithemojisymbols
AT ferrerblascoteresa accommodativestimulusresponsecurvewithemojisymbols