Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative 3D Conformal Radiotherapy or VMAT

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients are usually treated within a multimodal therapy regime, in which the tumor resection plays the major role. This treatment ideally includes 5-fluorouracile (5FU)-based chemoradiation (CRT) leading to significantly improved local control rates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Regnier, Antonia, Ulbrich, Jana, Münch, Stefan, Oechsner, Markus, Wilhelm, Dirk, Combs, Stephanie E., Habermehl, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5611394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979889
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00225
_version_ 1783265940471808000
author Regnier, Antonia
Ulbrich, Jana
Münch, Stefan
Oechsner, Markus
Wilhelm, Dirk
Combs, Stephanie E.
Habermehl, Daniel
author_facet Regnier, Antonia
Ulbrich, Jana
Münch, Stefan
Oechsner, Markus
Wilhelm, Dirk
Combs, Stephanie E.
Habermehl, Daniel
author_sort Regnier, Antonia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients are usually treated within a multimodal therapy regime, in which the tumor resection plays the major role. This treatment ideally includes 5-fluorouracile (5FU)-based chemoradiation (CRT) leading to significantly improved local control rates. Local therapy as radiotherapy (RT) is required to be adapted referring to side effects and efficacy. Purpose of this study is the comparison of dosimetric parameters, acute and late toxicity, and quality of life in terms of patient-reported outcome (PRO) in patients treated with VMAT or 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for LARC. METHODS: Pelvic RT for LARC was performed with a prescription dose of 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy per fraction, 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy per fraction, or 50 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction. Chemotherapy included 5FU or 5FU/Oxaliplatin or Capecitabine-based RT. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated via National Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version (CTCAE) v4.03 and the Scoring System Late effects of Normal Tissue. Quality of life was established via EORTC QLQCR29. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 38 months (VMAT) and 78 months (3DCRT) there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (p = 0,85) but a significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.032). Regarding dose–volume parameters, patients treated with VMAT plans had a lower V20 of the bladder than 3DCRT-treated patients (p = 0.004). VMAT plans can also reduce Dmean of the right (p = 0.002) and left (p < 0.001) femoral head. Acute side effects between the VMAT and 3DCRT patients showed no significant difference. But concerning long-term effects, VMAT-treated patients had a significant lower appearance of high grade anal incontinence (p = 0.032). Quality of life (PRO) showed no significant different between the patients except of hair loss and worrying about weight. CONCLUSION: VMAT treatment of LARC in preoperative CRT revealed a reduction of dose to organs at risk (OARs) as bladder and femoral heads. However, no changes in acute and long-term toxicity profiles were detectable. For late toxicity and quality of life data longer follow-up times are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5611394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56113942017-10-04 Comparative Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative 3D Conformal Radiotherapy or VMAT Regnier, Antonia Ulbrich, Jana Münch, Stefan Oechsner, Markus Wilhelm, Dirk Combs, Stephanie E. Habermehl, Daniel Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients are usually treated within a multimodal therapy regime, in which the tumor resection plays the major role. This treatment ideally includes 5-fluorouracile (5FU)-based chemoradiation (CRT) leading to significantly improved local control rates. Local therapy as radiotherapy (RT) is required to be adapted referring to side effects and efficacy. Purpose of this study is the comparison of dosimetric parameters, acute and late toxicity, and quality of life in terms of patient-reported outcome (PRO) in patients treated with VMAT or 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for LARC. METHODS: Pelvic RT for LARC was performed with a prescription dose of 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy per fraction, 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy per fraction, or 50 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction. Chemotherapy included 5FU or 5FU/Oxaliplatin or Capecitabine-based RT. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated via National Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version (CTCAE) v4.03 and the Scoring System Late effects of Normal Tissue. Quality of life was established via EORTC QLQCR29. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 38 months (VMAT) and 78 months (3DCRT) there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (p = 0,85) but a significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.032). Regarding dose–volume parameters, patients treated with VMAT plans had a lower V20 of the bladder than 3DCRT-treated patients (p = 0.004). VMAT plans can also reduce Dmean of the right (p = 0.002) and left (p < 0.001) femoral head. Acute side effects between the VMAT and 3DCRT patients showed no significant difference. But concerning long-term effects, VMAT-treated patients had a significant lower appearance of high grade anal incontinence (p = 0.032). Quality of life (PRO) showed no significant different between the patients except of hair loss and worrying about weight. CONCLUSION: VMAT treatment of LARC in preoperative CRT revealed a reduction of dose to organs at risk (OARs) as bladder and femoral heads. However, no changes in acute and long-term toxicity profiles were detectable. For late toxicity and quality of life data longer follow-up times are required. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5611394/ /pubmed/28979889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00225 Text en Copyright © 2017 Regnier, Ulbrich, Münch, Oechsner, Wilhelm, Combs and Habermehl. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Regnier, Antonia
Ulbrich, Jana
Münch, Stefan
Oechsner, Markus
Wilhelm, Dirk
Combs, Stephanie E.
Habermehl, Daniel
Comparative Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative 3D Conformal Radiotherapy or VMAT
title Comparative Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative 3D Conformal Radiotherapy or VMAT
title_full Comparative Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative 3D Conformal Radiotherapy or VMAT
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative 3D Conformal Radiotherapy or VMAT
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative 3D Conformal Radiotherapy or VMAT
title_short Comparative Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative 3D Conformal Radiotherapy or VMAT
title_sort comparative analysis of efficacy, toxicity, and patient-reported outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative 3d conformal radiotherapy or vmat
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5611394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979889
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00225
work_keys_str_mv AT regnierantonia comparativeanalysisofefficacytoxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesinrectalcancerpatientsundergoingpreoperative3dconformalradiotherapyorvmat
AT ulbrichjana comparativeanalysisofefficacytoxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesinrectalcancerpatientsundergoingpreoperative3dconformalradiotherapyorvmat
AT munchstefan comparativeanalysisofefficacytoxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesinrectalcancerpatientsundergoingpreoperative3dconformalradiotherapyorvmat
AT oechsnermarkus comparativeanalysisofefficacytoxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesinrectalcancerpatientsundergoingpreoperative3dconformalradiotherapyorvmat
AT wilhelmdirk comparativeanalysisofefficacytoxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesinrectalcancerpatientsundergoingpreoperative3dconformalradiotherapyorvmat
AT combsstephaniee comparativeanalysisofefficacytoxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesinrectalcancerpatientsundergoingpreoperative3dconformalradiotherapyorvmat
AT habermehldaniel comparativeanalysisofefficacytoxicityandpatientreportedoutcomesinrectalcancerpatientsundergoingpreoperative3dconformalradiotherapyorvmat