Cargando…

The Immediate and Delayed Effects of TV: Impacts of Gender and Processed-Food Intake History

Eating while watching TV has generally been found to increase both immediate and delayed energy intake. Here we examine two factors – gender and habitual processed-food intake – that may moderate these effects. Participants [n = 153; 95 women, 58 men; M(age) = 19.7 (SD = 2.9); M(BMI) = 22.4 (SD = 3....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Francis, Heather M., Stevenson, Richard J., Oaten, Megan J., Mahmut, Mehmet K., Yeomans, Martin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5611398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01616
_version_ 1783265941498363904
author Francis, Heather M.
Stevenson, Richard J.
Oaten, Megan J.
Mahmut, Mehmet K.
Yeomans, Martin R.
author_facet Francis, Heather M.
Stevenson, Richard J.
Oaten, Megan J.
Mahmut, Mehmet K.
Yeomans, Martin R.
author_sort Francis, Heather M.
collection PubMed
description Eating while watching TV has generally been found to increase both immediate and delayed energy intake. Here we examine two factors – gender and habitual processed-food intake – that may moderate these effects. Participants [n = 153; 95 women, 58 men; M(age) = 19.7 (SD = 2.9); M(BMI) = 22.4 (SD = 3.1)] ate an ad libitum snack either with or without TV, followed around 1 h later by lunch. There was an interaction between TV and gender for both meals. Women tended to consume more snack food in the TV condition, with men consuming more in the no-TV condition. Participants who habitually consumed more processed food also ate more snacks, independent of any other variable, including rated liking. At lunch, men who had earlier snacked with TV ate more than men who had snacked without TV, but this effect was not evident in women. On memory recall, all participants underestimated how much snack food they had eaten, and this was a function of how much they had actually consumed, with greater error only predicted by greater consumption. The results indicate that the effects of TV on eating can vary with gender and that processed-food history can predict snack food intake. While previous findings suggest memory of prior-intake may be impaired by eating while watching TV, the current results suggest this is not necessarily because of TV per se, but because people sometimes consume more food under such conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5611398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56113982017-10-04 The Immediate and Delayed Effects of TV: Impacts of Gender and Processed-Food Intake History Francis, Heather M. Stevenson, Richard J. Oaten, Megan J. Mahmut, Mehmet K. Yeomans, Martin R. Front Psychol Psychology Eating while watching TV has generally been found to increase both immediate and delayed energy intake. Here we examine two factors – gender and habitual processed-food intake – that may moderate these effects. Participants [n = 153; 95 women, 58 men; M(age) = 19.7 (SD = 2.9); M(BMI) = 22.4 (SD = 3.1)] ate an ad libitum snack either with or without TV, followed around 1 h later by lunch. There was an interaction between TV and gender for both meals. Women tended to consume more snack food in the TV condition, with men consuming more in the no-TV condition. Participants who habitually consumed more processed food also ate more snacks, independent of any other variable, including rated liking. At lunch, men who had earlier snacked with TV ate more than men who had snacked without TV, but this effect was not evident in women. On memory recall, all participants underestimated how much snack food they had eaten, and this was a function of how much they had actually consumed, with greater error only predicted by greater consumption. The results indicate that the effects of TV on eating can vary with gender and that processed-food history can predict snack food intake. While previous findings suggest memory of prior-intake may be impaired by eating while watching TV, the current results suggest this is not necessarily because of TV per se, but because people sometimes consume more food under such conditions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5611398/ /pubmed/28979225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01616 Text en Copyright © 2017 Francis, Stevenson, Oaten, Mahmut and Yeomans. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Francis, Heather M.
Stevenson, Richard J.
Oaten, Megan J.
Mahmut, Mehmet K.
Yeomans, Martin R.
The Immediate and Delayed Effects of TV: Impacts of Gender and Processed-Food Intake History
title The Immediate and Delayed Effects of TV: Impacts of Gender and Processed-Food Intake History
title_full The Immediate and Delayed Effects of TV: Impacts of Gender and Processed-Food Intake History
title_fullStr The Immediate and Delayed Effects of TV: Impacts of Gender and Processed-Food Intake History
title_full_unstemmed The Immediate and Delayed Effects of TV: Impacts of Gender and Processed-Food Intake History
title_short The Immediate and Delayed Effects of TV: Impacts of Gender and Processed-Food Intake History
title_sort immediate and delayed effects of tv: impacts of gender and processed-food intake history
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5611398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01616
work_keys_str_mv AT francisheatherm theimmediateanddelayedeffectsoftvimpactsofgenderandprocessedfoodintakehistory
AT stevensonrichardj theimmediateanddelayedeffectsoftvimpactsofgenderandprocessedfoodintakehistory
AT oatenmeganj theimmediateanddelayedeffectsoftvimpactsofgenderandprocessedfoodintakehistory
AT mahmutmehmetk theimmediateanddelayedeffectsoftvimpactsofgenderandprocessedfoodintakehistory
AT yeomansmartinr theimmediateanddelayedeffectsoftvimpactsofgenderandprocessedfoodintakehistory
AT francisheatherm immediateanddelayedeffectsoftvimpactsofgenderandprocessedfoodintakehistory
AT stevensonrichardj immediateanddelayedeffectsoftvimpactsofgenderandprocessedfoodintakehistory
AT oatenmeganj immediateanddelayedeffectsoftvimpactsofgenderandprocessedfoodintakehistory
AT mahmutmehmetk immediateanddelayedeffectsoftvimpactsofgenderandprocessedfoodintakehistory
AT yeomansmartinr immediateanddelayedeffectsoftvimpactsofgenderandprocessedfoodintakehistory