Cargando…

Evaluation of Four Different Restorative Materials for Restoration of the Periodontal Condition of Wedge-Shaped Defect: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to conduct a clinical evaluation of four restorative materials for restoration of dental wedge-shaped defect (WSD) and their impacts on periodontal tissues. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 280 maxillary premolars with dental WSD were selected from 106 patients; the patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruan, Jian-Yong, Gong, Zheng-Lin, Zhang, Rui-Zhi, Zhang, Zhe, Xu, Ran, Li, Da-Xu, Ren, Le, Tao, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28917087
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.902937
_version_ 1783266068470431744
author Ruan, Jian-Yong
Gong, Zheng-Lin
Zhang, Rui-Zhi
Zhang, Zhe
Xu, Ran
Li, Da-Xu
Ren, Le
Tao, Hong
author_facet Ruan, Jian-Yong
Gong, Zheng-Lin
Zhang, Rui-Zhi
Zhang, Zhe
Xu, Ran
Li, Da-Xu
Ren, Le
Tao, Hong
author_sort Ruan, Jian-Yong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to conduct a clinical evaluation of four restorative materials for restoration of dental wedge-shaped defect (WSD) and their impacts on periodontal tissues. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 280 maxillary premolars with dental WSD were selected from 106 patients; the patient cases were divided into eight groups according to different combinations of restorative materials (flowable resin composites, Dyract compomers, glass ionomer cement (GIC), light-curing composite resin), and WSD positions (approaching gingival and subgingival positions). Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volume, levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) in GCF were analyzed, while probing depth (PD), plaque index (PLI), and sulcus bleeding index (SBI) were also measured. The periodontal conditions of all patients were followed prior to restoration, as well as six months and 12 months after restoration. RESULTS: After six months of restoration, the overall clinical success rates of flowable resin composites, Dyract compomers, and light-curing composite resin were greater than those of GIC. GCF volume, GCF-AST, IL-1β levels, PD, PLI, and SBI of cases restored by GIC were higher than those restored by the other three materials. After 12 months of restoration, the overall clinical success rates of flowable resin composites and Dyract compomers were greater than those of light-curing composite resin and GIC. GCF volume, GCF-AST, GCF-ALP, IL-1β levels, PD, PLI, and SBI of cases restored by GIC were higher than those restored by the other three materials. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided evidence that the clinical efficacy of flowable resin composites, Dyract compomers, and light-curing composite resin was greater than that of GIC for restoration of dental WSD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5612178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56121782017-10-02 Evaluation of Four Different Restorative Materials for Restoration of the Periodontal Condition of Wedge-Shaped Defect: A Comparative Study Ruan, Jian-Yong Gong, Zheng-Lin Zhang, Rui-Zhi Zhang, Zhe Xu, Ran Li, Da-Xu Ren, Le Tao, Hong Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to conduct a clinical evaluation of four restorative materials for restoration of dental wedge-shaped defect (WSD) and their impacts on periodontal tissues. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 280 maxillary premolars with dental WSD were selected from 106 patients; the patient cases were divided into eight groups according to different combinations of restorative materials (flowable resin composites, Dyract compomers, glass ionomer cement (GIC), light-curing composite resin), and WSD positions (approaching gingival and subgingival positions). Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volume, levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) in GCF were analyzed, while probing depth (PD), plaque index (PLI), and sulcus bleeding index (SBI) were also measured. The periodontal conditions of all patients were followed prior to restoration, as well as six months and 12 months after restoration. RESULTS: After six months of restoration, the overall clinical success rates of flowable resin composites, Dyract compomers, and light-curing composite resin were greater than those of GIC. GCF volume, GCF-AST, IL-1β levels, PD, PLI, and SBI of cases restored by GIC were higher than those restored by the other three materials. After 12 months of restoration, the overall clinical success rates of flowable resin composites and Dyract compomers were greater than those of light-curing composite resin and GIC. GCF volume, GCF-AST, GCF-ALP, IL-1β levels, PD, PLI, and SBI of cases restored by GIC were higher than those restored by the other three materials. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided evidence that the clinical efficacy of flowable resin composites, Dyract compomers, and light-curing composite resin was greater than that of GIC for restoration of dental WSD. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2017-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5612178/ /pubmed/28917087 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.902937 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2017 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ruan, Jian-Yong
Gong, Zheng-Lin
Zhang, Rui-Zhi
Zhang, Zhe
Xu, Ran
Li, Da-Xu
Ren, Le
Tao, Hong
Evaluation of Four Different Restorative Materials for Restoration of the Periodontal Condition of Wedge-Shaped Defect: A Comparative Study
title Evaluation of Four Different Restorative Materials for Restoration of the Periodontal Condition of Wedge-Shaped Defect: A Comparative Study
title_full Evaluation of Four Different Restorative Materials for Restoration of the Periodontal Condition of Wedge-Shaped Defect: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Four Different Restorative Materials for Restoration of the Periodontal Condition of Wedge-Shaped Defect: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Four Different Restorative Materials for Restoration of the Periodontal Condition of Wedge-Shaped Defect: A Comparative Study
title_short Evaluation of Four Different Restorative Materials for Restoration of the Periodontal Condition of Wedge-Shaped Defect: A Comparative Study
title_sort evaluation of four different restorative materials for restoration of the periodontal condition of wedge-shaped defect: a comparative study
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28917087
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.902937
work_keys_str_mv AT ruanjianyong evaluationoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsforrestorationoftheperiodontalconditionofwedgeshapeddefectacomparativestudy
AT gongzhenglin evaluationoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsforrestorationoftheperiodontalconditionofwedgeshapeddefectacomparativestudy
AT zhangruizhi evaluationoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsforrestorationoftheperiodontalconditionofwedgeshapeddefectacomparativestudy
AT zhangzhe evaluationoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsforrestorationoftheperiodontalconditionofwedgeshapeddefectacomparativestudy
AT xuran evaluationoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsforrestorationoftheperiodontalconditionofwedgeshapeddefectacomparativestudy
AT lidaxu evaluationoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsforrestorationoftheperiodontalconditionofwedgeshapeddefectacomparativestudy
AT renle evaluationoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsforrestorationoftheperiodontalconditionofwedgeshapeddefectacomparativestudy
AT taohong evaluationoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsforrestorationoftheperiodontalconditionofwedgeshapeddefectacomparativestudy