Cargando…
Assessing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Using a Finger Stick Analysis in Recalls from Breast Screening: The CINFIBS Explorative Study
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a handheld point-of-care (POC) device is able to predict and discriminate patients at potential risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) prior to iodine-based contrast media delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 2014 and June 2016, women undergoing contrast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29097928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5670384 |
_version_ | 1783266105392889856 |
---|---|
author | Houben, I. P. L. van Berlo, C. J. L. Y. Bekers, O. Nijssen, E. C. Lobbes, M. B. I. Wildberger, J. E. |
author_facet | Houben, I. P. L. van Berlo, C. J. L. Y. Bekers, O. Nijssen, E. C. Lobbes, M. B. I. Wildberger, J. E. |
author_sort | Houben, I. P. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a handheld point-of-care (POC) device is able to predict and discriminate patients at potential risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) prior to iodine-based contrast media delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 2014 and June 2016, women undergoing contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) with an iodine-based contrast agent were asked to have their risk of CIN assessed by a dedicated POC device (StatSensor CREAT) and a risk factor questionnaire based on national guidelines. Prior to contrast injection, a venous blood sample was drawn to compare the results of POC with regular laboratory testing. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were included; 344 were finally categorized as low risk patients by blood creatinine evaluation. Seven patients had a eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), necessitating additional preparation prior to contrast delivery. The POC device failed to categorize six out of seven patients (86%), leading to (at that stage) unwanted contrast administration. Two patients subsequently developed CIN after 2–5 days, which was self-limiting after 30 days. CONCLUSION: The POC device tested was not able to reliably assess impairment of renal function in our patient cohort undergoing CESM. Consequently, we still consider classic clinical laboratory testing preferable in patients at potential risk for developing CIN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5612678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56126782017-09-28 Assessing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Using a Finger Stick Analysis in Recalls from Breast Screening: The CINFIBS Explorative Study Houben, I. P. L. van Berlo, C. J. L. Y. Bekers, O. Nijssen, E. C. Lobbes, M. B. I. Wildberger, J. E. Contrast Media Mol Imaging Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a handheld point-of-care (POC) device is able to predict and discriminate patients at potential risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) prior to iodine-based contrast media delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 2014 and June 2016, women undergoing contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) with an iodine-based contrast agent were asked to have their risk of CIN assessed by a dedicated POC device (StatSensor CREAT) and a risk factor questionnaire based on national guidelines. Prior to contrast injection, a venous blood sample was drawn to compare the results of POC with regular laboratory testing. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were included; 344 were finally categorized as low risk patients by blood creatinine evaluation. Seven patients had a eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), necessitating additional preparation prior to contrast delivery. The POC device failed to categorize six out of seven patients (86%), leading to (at that stage) unwanted contrast administration. Two patients subsequently developed CIN after 2–5 days, which was self-limiting after 30 days. CONCLUSION: The POC device tested was not able to reliably assess impairment of renal function in our patient cohort undergoing CESM. Consequently, we still consider classic clinical laboratory testing preferable in patients at potential risk for developing CIN. Hindawi 2017-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5612678/ /pubmed/29097928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5670384 Text en Copyright © 2017 I. P. L. Houben et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Houben, I. P. L. van Berlo, C. J. L. Y. Bekers, O. Nijssen, E. C. Lobbes, M. B. I. Wildberger, J. E. Assessing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Using a Finger Stick Analysis in Recalls from Breast Screening: The CINFIBS Explorative Study |
title | Assessing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Using a Finger Stick Analysis in Recalls from Breast Screening: The CINFIBS Explorative Study |
title_full | Assessing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Using a Finger Stick Analysis in Recalls from Breast Screening: The CINFIBS Explorative Study |
title_fullStr | Assessing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Using a Finger Stick Analysis in Recalls from Breast Screening: The CINFIBS Explorative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Using a Finger Stick Analysis in Recalls from Breast Screening: The CINFIBS Explorative Study |
title_short | Assessing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Using a Finger Stick Analysis in Recalls from Breast Screening: The CINFIBS Explorative Study |
title_sort | assessing the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy using a finger stick analysis in recalls from breast screening: the cinfibs explorative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29097928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5670384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houbenipl assessingtheriskofcontrastinducednephropathyusingafingerstickanalysisinrecallsfrombreastscreeningthecinfibsexplorativestudy AT vanberlocjly assessingtheriskofcontrastinducednephropathyusingafingerstickanalysisinrecallsfrombreastscreeningthecinfibsexplorativestudy AT bekerso assessingtheriskofcontrastinducednephropathyusingafingerstickanalysisinrecallsfrombreastscreeningthecinfibsexplorativestudy AT nijssenec assessingtheriskofcontrastinducednephropathyusingafingerstickanalysisinrecallsfrombreastscreeningthecinfibsexplorativestudy AT lobbesmbi assessingtheriskofcontrastinducednephropathyusingafingerstickanalysisinrecallsfrombreastscreeningthecinfibsexplorativestudy AT wildbergerje assessingtheriskofcontrastinducednephropathyusingafingerstickanalysisinrecallsfrombreastscreeningthecinfibsexplorativestudy |