Cargando…

How do environmental governance processes shape evaluation of outcomes by stakeholders? A causal pathways approach

Multi-stakeholder environmental management and governance processes are essential to realize social and ecological outcomes. Participation, collaboration, and learning are emphasized in these processes; to gain insights into how they influence stakeholders’ evaluations of outcomes in relation to man...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plummer, Ryan, Dzyundzyak, Angela, Baird, Julia, Bodin, Örjan, Armitage, Derek, Schultz, Lisen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28945792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185375
_version_ 1783266120839462912
author Plummer, Ryan
Dzyundzyak, Angela
Baird, Julia
Bodin, Örjan
Armitage, Derek
Schultz, Lisen
author_facet Plummer, Ryan
Dzyundzyak, Angela
Baird, Julia
Bodin, Örjan
Armitage, Derek
Schultz, Lisen
author_sort Plummer, Ryan
collection PubMed
description Multi-stakeholder environmental management and governance processes are essential to realize social and ecological outcomes. Participation, collaboration, and learning are emphasized in these processes; to gain insights into how they influence stakeholders’ evaluations of outcomes in relation to management and governance interventions we use a path analysis approach to examine their relationships in individuals in four UNESCO Biosphere Reserves. We confirm a model showing that participation in more activities leads to greater ratings of process, and in turn, better evaluations of outcomes. We show the effects of participation in activities on evaluation of outcomes appear to be driven by learning more than collaboration. Original insights are offered as to how the evaluations of outcomes by stakeholders are shaped by their participation in activities and their experiences in management and governance processes. Understanding stakeholder perceptions about the processes in which they are involved and their evaluation of outcomes is imperative, and influences current and future levels of engagement. As such, the evaluation of outcomes themselves are an important tangible product from initiatives. Our research contributes to a future research agenda aimed at better understanding these pathways and their implications for engagement in stewardship and ultimately social and ecological outcomes, and to developing recommendations for practitioners engaged in environmental management and governance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5612751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56127512017-10-09 How do environmental governance processes shape evaluation of outcomes by stakeholders? A causal pathways approach Plummer, Ryan Dzyundzyak, Angela Baird, Julia Bodin, Örjan Armitage, Derek Schultz, Lisen PLoS One Research Article Multi-stakeholder environmental management and governance processes are essential to realize social and ecological outcomes. Participation, collaboration, and learning are emphasized in these processes; to gain insights into how they influence stakeholders’ evaluations of outcomes in relation to management and governance interventions we use a path analysis approach to examine their relationships in individuals in four UNESCO Biosphere Reserves. We confirm a model showing that participation in more activities leads to greater ratings of process, and in turn, better evaluations of outcomes. We show the effects of participation in activities on evaluation of outcomes appear to be driven by learning more than collaboration. Original insights are offered as to how the evaluations of outcomes by stakeholders are shaped by their participation in activities and their experiences in management and governance processes. Understanding stakeholder perceptions about the processes in which they are involved and their evaluation of outcomes is imperative, and influences current and future levels of engagement. As such, the evaluation of outcomes themselves are an important tangible product from initiatives. Our research contributes to a future research agenda aimed at better understanding these pathways and their implications for engagement in stewardship and ultimately social and ecological outcomes, and to developing recommendations for practitioners engaged in environmental management and governance. Public Library of Science 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5612751/ /pubmed/28945792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185375 Text en © 2017 Plummer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Plummer, Ryan
Dzyundzyak, Angela
Baird, Julia
Bodin, Örjan
Armitage, Derek
Schultz, Lisen
How do environmental governance processes shape evaluation of outcomes by stakeholders? A causal pathways approach
title How do environmental governance processes shape evaluation of outcomes by stakeholders? A causal pathways approach
title_full How do environmental governance processes shape evaluation of outcomes by stakeholders? A causal pathways approach
title_fullStr How do environmental governance processes shape evaluation of outcomes by stakeholders? A causal pathways approach
title_full_unstemmed How do environmental governance processes shape evaluation of outcomes by stakeholders? A causal pathways approach
title_short How do environmental governance processes shape evaluation of outcomes by stakeholders? A causal pathways approach
title_sort how do environmental governance processes shape evaluation of outcomes by stakeholders? a causal pathways approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28945792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185375
work_keys_str_mv AT plummerryan howdoenvironmentalgovernanceprocessesshapeevaluationofoutcomesbystakeholdersacausalpathwaysapproach
AT dzyundzyakangela howdoenvironmentalgovernanceprocessesshapeevaluationofoutcomesbystakeholdersacausalpathwaysapproach
AT bairdjulia howdoenvironmentalgovernanceprocessesshapeevaluationofoutcomesbystakeholdersacausalpathwaysapproach
AT bodinorjan howdoenvironmentalgovernanceprocessesshapeevaluationofoutcomesbystakeholdersacausalpathwaysapproach
AT armitagederek howdoenvironmentalgovernanceprocessesshapeevaluationofoutcomesbystakeholdersacausalpathwaysapproach
AT schultzlisen howdoenvironmentalgovernanceprocessesshapeevaluationofoutcomesbystakeholdersacausalpathwaysapproach