Cargando…
A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Gallstone sigmoid ileus is a rare condition that presents with symptoms of large bowel obstruction secondary to a gallstone impacted within the sigmoid colon. This arises because of three primary factors: cholelithiasis causing a cholecystoenteric fistula; a gallstone large enough...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28942224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.09.009 |
_version_ | 1783266127064858624 |
---|---|
author | Farkas, Nicholas Karthigan, Ravindran Lewis, Trystan Read, James Farhat, Sami Zaidi, Ahsan West, Nicholas |
author_facet | Farkas, Nicholas Karthigan, Ravindran Lewis, Trystan Read, James Farhat, Sami Zaidi, Ahsan West, Nicholas |
author_sort | Farkas, Nicholas |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Gallstone sigmoid ileus is a rare condition that presents with symptoms of large bowel obstruction secondary to a gallstone impacted within the sigmoid colon. This arises because of three primary factors: cholelithiasis causing a cholecystoenteric fistula; a gallstone large enough to obstruct the bowel lumen; and narrowing of the bowel. We describe 3 patients treated in a district general hospital over a 3-year period, and discuss their management. METHODS: Cases were retrospectively analysed from a single center between 2015 and 2017 in line with the SCARE guidelines. RESULTS: 3 patients – 2 female, 1 male. Age: 89, 68, 69 years. 2 cholecystocolonic fistulae, 1 cholecystoenteric (small bowel) fistula. Patient 1: Unsuccessful endoscopic attempts to retrieve the (5 × 5 cm) gallstone resulted in surgery. Retrograde milking of the stone to caecum enabled removal via modified appendicectomy. Patient 2: Endoscopy and lithotripsy failed to fragment stone. Prior to laparotomy the stone was palpated in the proximal rectum enabling manual extraction. Patient 3: Laparotomy for gallstone ileus failed to identify a stone within the small bowel. Gallstone sigmoid ileus then developed. Conservative measures successfully decompressed the large bowel 6 days post-operation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case series highlighting the differing strategies and challenges faced by clinicians managing gallstone sigmoid ileus. Conservative measures (including manual evacuation), endoscopy, lithotripsy and surgery all play important roles in relieving large bowel obstruction. It is essential to tailor care to individual patients’ needs given the complexities of this potentially life threatening condition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5612792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56127922017-10-02 A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management Farkas, Nicholas Karthigan, Ravindran Lewis, Trystan Read, James Farhat, Sami Zaidi, Ahsan West, Nicholas Int J Surg Case Rep Case Series AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Gallstone sigmoid ileus is a rare condition that presents with symptoms of large bowel obstruction secondary to a gallstone impacted within the sigmoid colon. This arises because of three primary factors: cholelithiasis causing a cholecystoenteric fistula; a gallstone large enough to obstruct the bowel lumen; and narrowing of the bowel. We describe 3 patients treated in a district general hospital over a 3-year period, and discuss their management. METHODS: Cases were retrospectively analysed from a single center between 2015 and 2017 in line with the SCARE guidelines. RESULTS: 3 patients – 2 female, 1 male. Age: 89, 68, 69 years. 2 cholecystocolonic fistulae, 1 cholecystoenteric (small bowel) fistula. Patient 1: Unsuccessful endoscopic attempts to retrieve the (5 × 5 cm) gallstone resulted in surgery. Retrograde milking of the stone to caecum enabled removal via modified appendicectomy. Patient 2: Endoscopy and lithotripsy failed to fragment stone. Prior to laparotomy the stone was palpated in the proximal rectum enabling manual extraction. Patient 3: Laparotomy for gallstone ileus failed to identify a stone within the small bowel. Gallstone sigmoid ileus then developed. Conservative measures successfully decompressed the large bowel 6 days post-operation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case series highlighting the differing strategies and challenges faced by clinicians managing gallstone sigmoid ileus. Conservative measures (including manual evacuation), endoscopy, lithotripsy and surgery all play important roles in relieving large bowel obstruction. It is essential to tailor care to individual patients’ needs given the complexities of this potentially life threatening condition. Elsevier 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5612792/ /pubmed/28942224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.09.009 Text en © 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Series Farkas, Nicholas Karthigan, Ravindran Lewis, Trystan Read, James Farhat, Sami Zaidi, Ahsan West, Nicholas A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management |
title | A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management |
title_full | A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management |
title_fullStr | A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management |
title_full_unstemmed | A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management |
title_short | A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management |
title_sort | single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28942224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.09.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farkasnicholas asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT karthiganravindran asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT lewistrystan asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT readjames asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT farhatsami asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT zaidiahsan asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT westnicholas asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT farkasnicholas singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT karthiganravindran singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT lewistrystan singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT readjames singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT farhatsami singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT zaidiahsan singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement AT westnicholas singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement |