Cargando…

A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Gallstone sigmoid ileus is a rare condition that presents with symptoms of large bowel obstruction secondary to a gallstone impacted within the sigmoid colon. This arises because of three primary factors: cholelithiasis causing a cholecystoenteric fistula; a gallstone large enough...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farkas, Nicholas, Karthigan, Ravindran, Lewis, Trystan, Read, James, Farhat, Sami, Zaidi, Ahsan, West, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28942224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.09.009
_version_ 1783266127064858624
author Farkas, Nicholas
Karthigan, Ravindran
Lewis, Trystan
Read, James
Farhat, Sami
Zaidi, Ahsan
West, Nicholas
author_facet Farkas, Nicholas
Karthigan, Ravindran
Lewis, Trystan
Read, James
Farhat, Sami
Zaidi, Ahsan
West, Nicholas
author_sort Farkas, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Gallstone sigmoid ileus is a rare condition that presents with symptoms of large bowel obstruction secondary to a gallstone impacted within the sigmoid colon. This arises because of three primary factors: cholelithiasis causing a cholecystoenteric fistula; a gallstone large enough to obstruct the bowel lumen; and narrowing of the bowel. We describe 3 patients treated in a district general hospital over a 3-year period, and discuss their management. METHODS: Cases were retrospectively analysed from a single center between 2015 and 2017 in line with the SCARE guidelines. RESULTS: 3 patients – 2 female, 1 male. Age: 89, 68, 69 years. 2 cholecystocolonic fistulae, 1 cholecystoenteric (small bowel) fistula. Patient 1: Unsuccessful endoscopic attempts to retrieve the (5 × 5 cm) gallstone resulted in surgery. Retrograde milking of the stone to caecum enabled removal via modified appendicectomy. Patient 2: Endoscopy and lithotripsy failed to fragment stone. Prior to laparotomy the stone was palpated in the proximal rectum enabling manual extraction. Patient 3: Laparotomy for gallstone ileus failed to identify a stone within the small bowel. Gallstone sigmoid ileus then developed. Conservative measures successfully decompressed the large bowel 6 days post-operation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case series highlighting the differing strategies and challenges faced by clinicians managing gallstone sigmoid ileus. Conservative measures (including manual evacuation), endoscopy, lithotripsy and surgery all play important roles in relieving large bowel obstruction. It is essential to tailor care to individual patients’ needs given the complexities of this potentially life threatening condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5612792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56127922017-10-02 A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management Farkas, Nicholas Karthigan, Ravindran Lewis, Trystan Read, James Farhat, Sami Zaidi, Ahsan West, Nicholas Int J Surg Case Rep Case Series AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Gallstone sigmoid ileus is a rare condition that presents with symptoms of large bowel obstruction secondary to a gallstone impacted within the sigmoid colon. This arises because of three primary factors: cholelithiasis causing a cholecystoenteric fistula; a gallstone large enough to obstruct the bowel lumen; and narrowing of the bowel. We describe 3 patients treated in a district general hospital over a 3-year period, and discuss their management. METHODS: Cases were retrospectively analysed from a single center between 2015 and 2017 in line with the SCARE guidelines. RESULTS: 3 patients – 2 female, 1 male. Age: 89, 68, 69 years. 2 cholecystocolonic fistulae, 1 cholecystoenteric (small bowel) fistula. Patient 1: Unsuccessful endoscopic attempts to retrieve the (5 × 5 cm) gallstone resulted in surgery. Retrograde milking of the stone to caecum enabled removal via modified appendicectomy. Patient 2: Endoscopy and lithotripsy failed to fragment stone. Prior to laparotomy the stone was palpated in the proximal rectum enabling manual extraction. Patient 3: Laparotomy for gallstone ileus failed to identify a stone within the small bowel. Gallstone sigmoid ileus then developed. Conservative measures successfully decompressed the large bowel 6 days post-operation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case series highlighting the differing strategies and challenges faced by clinicians managing gallstone sigmoid ileus. Conservative measures (including manual evacuation), endoscopy, lithotripsy and surgery all play important roles in relieving large bowel obstruction. It is essential to tailor care to individual patients’ needs given the complexities of this potentially life threatening condition. Elsevier 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5612792/ /pubmed/28942224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.09.009 Text en © 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
Farkas, Nicholas
Karthigan, Ravindran
Lewis, Trystan
Read, James
Farhat, Sami
Zaidi, Ahsan
West, Nicholas
A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management
title A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management
title_full A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management
title_fullStr A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management
title_full_unstemmed A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management
title_short A single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management
title_sort single centre case series of gallstone sigmoid ileus management
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28942224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.09.009
work_keys_str_mv AT farkasnicholas asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT karthiganravindran asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT lewistrystan asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT readjames asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT farhatsami asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT zaidiahsan asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT westnicholas asinglecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT farkasnicholas singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT karthiganravindran singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT lewistrystan singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT readjames singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT farhatsami singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT zaidiahsan singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement
AT westnicholas singlecentrecaseseriesofgallstonesigmoidileusmanagement