Cargando…
Use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats
Although antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been used as feed additives, only a few studies have examined their use in ruminants. In this study, we evaluated the use of AMPs(recombinant swine defensin and a fly antibacterial peptide were mixed by 1:1) as a medicated feed additive for juvenile goats....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28947748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12394-4 |
_version_ | 1783266148755701760 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Qi Yao, Shuhua Chen, Yun Gao, Shuang Yang, Yanyi Deng, Junliang Ren, Zhihua Shen, Liuhong Cui, Hengmin Hu, Yanchun Ma, Xiaoping Yu, Shumin |
author_facet | Liu, Qi Yao, Shuhua Chen, Yun Gao, Shuang Yang, Yanyi Deng, Junliang Ren, Zhihua Shen, Liuhong Cui, Hengmin Hu, Yanchun Ma, Xiaoping Yu, Shumin |
author_sort | Liu, Qi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been used as feed additives, only a few studies have examined their use in ruminants. In this study, we evaluated the use of AMPs(recombinant swine defensin and a fly antibacterial peptide were mixed by 1:1) as a medicated feed additive for juvenile goats. Dietary treatments included control groups (group I: 300 g concentrate; group III: 600 g concentrate), and AMP-supplemented groups (group II: 300 g concentrate + 3.0 g AMPs; group IV: 600 g concentrate + 3.0 g AMPs). AMP-treated groups exhibited an increase in bacterial genera, including Fibrobacter, Anaerovibrio, and Succiniclasticum, and the ciliate genus Ophryoscolex; as well a reduction in bacterial genera, such as Selenomonas, Succinivibrio, and Treponema, and the ciliate genera Polyplastron, Entodinium, and Isotricha. The changes in Fibrobacter, Anaerovibrio, Ophryoscolex, Polyplastron, Entodinium, and Isotricha were related to the concentrate. AMP treatment led to increased body weight, average daily weight gain, enzymatic activity (pectinase, xylanase, and lipase), especially in the normal concentrate group, and influence on ruminal fermentation function. In addition, goats treated with AMPs had higher rumen microorganism diversity indices than the control groups. Our results demonstrate that AMPs can be utilized as feed additives for juvenile goats. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5612951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56129512017-10-11 Use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats Liu, Qi Yao, Shuhua Chen, Yun Gao, Shuang Yang, Yanyi Deng, Junliang Ren, Zhihua Shen, Liuhong Cui, Hengmin Hu, Yanchun Ma, Xiaoping Yu, Shumin Sci Rep Article Although antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been used as feed additives, only a few studies have examined their use in ruminants. In this study, we evaluated the use of AMPs(recombinant swine defensin and a fly antibacterial peptide were mixed by 1:1) as a medicated feed additive for juvenile goats. Dietary treatments included control groups (group I: 300 g concentrate; group III: 600 g concentrate), and AMP-supplemented groups (group II: 300 g concentrate + 3.0 g AMPs; group IV: 600 g concentrate + 3.0 g AMPs). AMP-treated groups exhibited an increase in bacterial genera, including Fibrobacter, Anaerovibrio, and Succiniclasticum, and the ciliate genus Ophryoscolex; as well a reduction in bacterial genera, such as Selenomonas, Succinivibrio, and Treponema, and the ciliate genera Polyplastron, Entodinium, and Isotricha. The changes in Fibrobacter, Anaerovibrio, Ophryoscolex, Polyplastron, Entodinium, and Isotricha were related to the concentrate. AMP treatment led to increased body weight, average daily weight gain, enzymatic activity (pectinase, xylanase, and lipase), especially in the normal concentrate group, and influence on ruminal fermentation function. In addition, goats treated with AMPs had higher rumen microorganism diversity indices than the control groups. Our results demonstrate that AMPs can be utilized as feed additives for juvenile goats. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5612951/ /pubmed/28947748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12394-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Qi Yao, Shuhua Chen, Yun Gao, Shuang Yang, Yanyi Deng, Junliang Ren, Zhihua Shen, Liuhong Cui, Hengmin Hu, Yanchun Ma, Xiaoping Yu, Shumin Use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats |
title | Use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats |
title_full | Use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats |
title_fullStr | Use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats |
title_short | Use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats |
title_sort | use of antimicrobial peptides as a feed additive for juvenile goats |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5612951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28947748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12394-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuqi useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT yaoshuhua useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT chenyun useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT gaoshuang useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT yangyanyi useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT dengjunliang useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT renzhihua useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT shenliuhong useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT cuihengmin useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT huyanchun useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT maxiaoping useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats AT yushumin useofantimicrobialpeptidesasafeedadditiveforjuvenilegoats |