Cargando…

Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework

BACKGROUND: Intermittent Auscultation (IA) is the recommended method of fetal surveillance for healthy women in labour. However, the majority of women receive continuous electronic monitoring. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore the views of Birthing Unit nurses about using IA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patey, Andrea M., Curran, Janet A., Sprague, Ann E., Francis, Jill J., Driedger, S. Michelle, Légaré, France, Lemyre, Louise, Pomey, Marie-Pascale A., Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5613395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z
_version_ 1783266245771001856
author Patey, Andrea M.
Curran, Janet A.
Sprague, Ann E.
Francis, Jill J.
Driedger, S. Michelle
Légaré, France
Lemyre, Louise
Pomey, Marie-Pascale A.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
author_facet Patey, Andrea M.
Curran, Janet A.
Sprague, Ann E.
Francis, Jill J.
Driedger, S. Michelle
Légaré, France
Lemyre, Louise
Pomey, Marie-Pascale A.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
author_sort Patey, Andrea M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intermittent Auscultation (IA) is the recommended method of fetal surveillance for healthy women in labour. However, the majority of women receive continuous electronic monitoring. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore the views of Birthing Unit nurses about using IA as their primary method of fetal surveillance for healthy women in labour. METHODS: Using a semi-structured interview guide, we interviewed a convenience sample of birthing unit nurses throughout Ontario, Canada to elicit their views about fetal surveillance. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were content analysed using the TDF and themes were framed as belief statements. Domains potentially key to changing fetal surveillance behaviour and informing intervention design were identified by noting the frequencies of beliefs, content, and their reported influence on the use of IA. RESULTS: We interviewed 12 birthing unit nurses. Seven of the 12 TDF domains were perceived to be key to changing birthing unit nurses’ behaviour The nurses reported that competing tasks, time constraints and the necessity to multitask often limit their ability to perform IA (domains Beliefs about capabilities; Environmental context and resources). Some nurses noted the decision to use IA was something that they consciously thought about with every patient while others stated it their default decision as long as there were no risk factors (Memory, attention and decision processes, Nature of behaviour). They identified positive consequences (e.g. avoid unnecessary interventions, mother-centered care) and negative consequences of using IA (e.g. legal concerns) and reported that the negative consequences can often outweigh positive consequences (Beliefs about consequences). Some reported that hospital policies and varying support from care teams inhibited their use of IA (Social influences), and that support from the entire team and hospital management would likely increase their use (Social influences; Behavioural regulation). CONCLUSION: We identified potential influences on birthing unit nurses’ use of IA as their primary method of fetal surveillance. These beliefs suggest potential targets for behaviour change interventions to promote IA use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5613395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56133952017-10-11 Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework Patey, Andrea M. Curran, Janet A. Sprague, Ann E. Francis, Jill J. Driedger, S. Michelle Légaré, France Lemyre, Louise Pomey, Marie-Pascale A. Grimshaw, Jeremy M. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Intermittent Auscultation (IA) is the recommended method of fetal surveillance for healthy women in labour. However, the majority of women receive continuous electronic monitoring. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore the views of Birthing Unit nurses about using IA as their primary method of fetal surveillance for healthy women in labour. METHODS: Using a semi-structured interview guide, we interviewed a convenience sample of birthing unit nurses throughout Ontario, Canada to elicit their views about fetal surveillance. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were content analysed using the TDF and themes were framed as belief statements. Domains potentially key to changing fetal surveillance behaviour and informing intervention design were identified by noting the frequencies of beliefs, content, and their reported influence on the use of IA. RESULTS: We interviewed 12 birthing unit nurses. Seven of the 12 TDF domains were perceived to be key to changing birthing unit nurses’ behaviour The nurses reported that competing tasks, time constraints and the necessity to multitask often limit their ability to perform IA (domains Beliefs about capabilities; Environmental context and resources). Some nurses noted the decision to use IA was something that they consciously thought about with every patient while others stated it their default decision as long as there were no risk factors (Memory, attention and decision processes, Nature of behaviour). They identified positive consequences (e.g. avoid unnecessary interventions, mother-centered care) and negative consequences of using IA (e.g. legal concerns) and reported that the negative consequences can often outweigh positive consequences (Beliefs about consequences). Some reported that hospital policies and varying support from care teams inhibited their use of IA (Social influences), and that support from the entire team and hospital management would likely increase their use (Social influences; Behavioural regulation). CONCLUSION: We identified potential influences on birthing unit nurses’ use of IA as their primary method of fetal surveillance. These beliefs suggest potential targets for behaviour change interventions to promote IA use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5613395/ /pubmed/28946843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Patey, Andrea M.
Curran, Janet A.
Sprague, Ann E.
Francis, Jill J.
Driedger, S. Michelle
Légaré, France
Lemyre, Louise
Pomey, Marie-Pascale A.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework
title Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework
title_full Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework
title_fullStr Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework
title_full_unstemmed Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework
title_short Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework
title_sort intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5613395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z
work_keys_str_mv AT pateyandream intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework
AT curranjaneta intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework
AT spragueanne intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework
AT francisjillj intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework
AT driedgersmichelle intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework
AT legarefrance intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework
AT lemyrelouise intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework
AT pomeymariepascalea intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework
AT grimshawjeremym intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework
AT intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework