Cargando…
Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework
BACKGROUND: Intermittent Auscultation (IA) is the recommended method of fetal surveillance for healthy women in labour. However, the majority of women receive continuous electronic monitoring. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore the views of Birthing Unit nurses about using IA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5613395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z |
_version_ | 1783266245771001856 |
---|---|
author | Patey, Andrea M. Curran, Janet A. Sprague, Ann E. Francis, Jill J. Driedger, S. Michelle Légaré, France Lemyre, Louise Pomey, Marie-Pascale A. Grimshaw, Jeremy M. |
author_facet | Patey, Andrea M. Curran, Janet A. Sprague, Ann E. Francis, Jill J. Driedger, S. Michelle Légaré, France Lemyre, Louise Pomey, Marie-Pascale A. Grimshaw, Jeremy M. |
author_sort | Patey, Andrea M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intermittent Auscultation (IA) is the recommended method of fetal surveillance for healthy women in labour. However, the majority of women receive continuous electronic monitoring. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore the views of Birthing Unit nurses about using IA as their primary method of fetal surveillance for healthy women in labour. METHODS: Using a semi-structured interview guide, we interviewed a convenience sample of birthing unit nurses throughout Ontario, Canada to elicit their views about fetal surveillance. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were content analysed using the TDF and themes were framed as belief statements. Domains potentially key to changing fetal surveillance behaviour and informing intervention design were identified by noting the frequencies of beliefs, content, and their reported influence on the use of IA. RESULTS: We interviewed 12 birthing unit nurses. Seven of the 12 TDF domains were perceived to be key to changing birthing unit nurses’ behaviour The nurses reported that competing tasks, time constraints and the necessity to multitask often limit their ability to perform IA (domains Beliefs about capabilities; Environmental context and resources). Some nurses noted the decision to use IA was something that they consciously thought about with every patient while others stated it their default decision as long as there were no risk factors (Memory, attention and decision processes, Nature of behaviour). They identified positive consequences (e.g. avoid unnecessary interventions, mother-centered care) and negative consequences of using IA (e.g. legal concerns) and reported that the negative consequences can often outweigh positive consequences (Beliefs about consequences). Some reported that hospital policies and varying support from care teams inhibited their use of IA (Social influences), and that support from the entire team and hospital management would likely increase their use (Social influences; Behavioural regulation). CONCLUSION: We identified potential influences on birthing unit nurses’ use of IA as their primary method of fetal surveillance. These beliefs suggest potential targets for behaviour change interventions to promote IA use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5613395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56133952017-10-11 Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework Patey, Andrea M. Curran, Janet A. Sprague, Ann E. Francis, Jill J. Driedger, S. Michelle Légaré, France Lemyre, Louise Pomey, Marie-Pascale A. Grimshaw, Jeremy M. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Intermittent Auscultation (IA) is the recommended method of fetal surveillance for healthy women in labour. However, the majority of women receive continuous electronic monitoring. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore the views of Birthing Unit nurses about using IA as their primary method of fetal surveillance for healthy women in labour. METHODS: Using a semi-structured interview guide, we interviewed a convenience sample of birthing unit nurses throughout Ontario, Canada to elicit their views about fetal surveillance. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were content analysed using the TDF and themes were framed as belief statements. Domains potentially key to changing fetal surveillance behaviour and informing intervention design were identified by noting the frequencies of beliefs, content, and their reported influence on the use of IA. RESULTS: We interviewed 12 birthing unit nurses. Seven of the 12 TDF domains were perceived to be key to changing birthing unit nurses’ behaviour The nurses reported that competing tasks, time constraints and the necessity to multitask often limit their ability to perform IA (domains Beliefs about capabilities; Environmental context and resources). Some nurses noted the decision to use IA was something that they consciously thought about with every patient while others stated it their default decision as long as there were no risk factors (Memory, attention and decision processes, Nature of behaviour). They identified positive consequences (e.g. avoid unnecessary interventions, mother-centered care) and negative consequences of using IA (e.g. legal concerns) and reported that the negative consequences can often outweigh positive consequences (Beliefs about consequences). Some reported that hospital policies and varying support from care teams inhibited their use of IA (Social influences), and that support from the entire team and hospital management would likely increase their use (Social influences; Behavioural regulation). CONCLUSION: We identified potential influences on birthing unit nurses’ use of IA as their primary method of fetal surveillance. These beliefs suggest potential targets for behaviour change interventions to promote IA use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5613395/ /pubmed/28946843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Patey, Andrea M. Curran, Janet A. Sprague, Ann E. Francis, Jill J. Driedger, S. Michelle Légaré, France Lemyre, Louise Pomey, Marie-Pascale A. Grimshaw, Jeremy M. Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework |
title | Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework |
title_full | Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework |
title_fullStr | Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework |
title_short | Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework |
title_sort | intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses’ fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5613395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1517-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pateyandream intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework AT curranjaneta intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework AT spragueanne intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework AT francisjillj intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework AT driedgersmichelle intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework AT legarefrance intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework AT lemyrelouise intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework AT pomeymariepascalea intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework AT grimshawjeremym intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework AT intermittentauscultationversuscontinuousfetalmonitoringexploringfactorsthatinfluencebirthingunitnursesfetalsurveillancepracticeusingtheoreticaldomainsframework |