Cargando…
Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study
Multiple studies have documented major limitations in the informed consent process for the recruitment of clinical research participants. One challenging aspect of this process is successful communication of risks and benefits to potential research participants. This study explored the opinions and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5613795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28975139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333393617732017 |
_version_ | 1783266324975190016 |
---|---|
author | Nusbaum, Lika Douglas, Brenda Damus, Karla Paasche-Orlow, Michael Estrella-Luna, Neenah |
author_facet | Nusbaum, Lika Douglas, Brenda Damus, Karla Paasche-Orlow, Michael Estrella-Luna, Neenah |
author_sort | Nusbaum, Lika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple studies have documented major limitations in the informed consent process for the recruitment of clinical research participants. One challenging aspect of this process is successful communication of risks and benefits to potential research participants. This study explored the opinions and attitudes of informed consent experts about conveying risks and benefits to inform the development of a survey about the perspectives of research nurses who are responsible for obtaining informed consent for clinical trials. The major themes identified were strategies for risks and benefits communication, ensuring comprehension, and preparation for the role of the consent administrator. From the experts’ perspective, inadequate education and training of the research staff responsible for informed consent process contribute to deficiencies in the informed consent process and risks and benefits communication. Inconsistencies in experts’ opinions and critique of certain widely used communication practices require further consideration and additional research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5613795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56137952017-10-03 Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study Nusbaum, Lika Douglas, Brenda Damus, Karla Paasche-Orlow, Michael Estrella-Luna, Neenah Glob Qual Nurs Res Article Multiple studies have documented major limitations in the informed consent process for the recruitment of clinical research participants. One challenging aspect of this process is successful communication of risks and benefits to potential research participants. This study explored the opinions and attitudes of informed consent experts about conveying risks and benefits to inform the development of a survey about the perspectives of research nurses who are responsible for obtaining informed consent for clinical trials. The major themes identified were strategies for risks and benefits communication, ensuring comprehension, and preparation for the role of the consent administrator. From the experts’ perspective, inadequate education and training of the research staff responsible for informed consent process contribute to deficiencies in the informed consent process and risks and benefits communication. Inconsistencies in experts’ opinions and critique of certain widely used communication practices require further consideration and additional research. SAGE Publications 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5613795/ /pubmed/28975139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333393617732017 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Nusbaum, Lika Douglas, Brenda Damus, Karla Paasche-Orlow, Michael Estrella-Luna, Neenah Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study |
title | Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study |
title_full | Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study |
title_fullStr | Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study |
title_short | Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study |
title_sort | communicating risks and benefits in informed consent for research: a qualitative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5613795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28975139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333393617732017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nusbaumlika communicatingrisksandbenefitsininformedconsentforresearchaqualitativestudy AT douglasbrenda communicatingrisksandbenefitsininformedconsentforresearchaqualitativestudy AT damuskarla communicatingrisksandbenefitsininformedconsentforresearchaqualitativestudy AT paascheorlowmichael communicatingrisksandbenefitsininformedconsentforresearchaqualitativestudy AT estrellalunaneenah communicatingrisksandbenefitsininformedconsentforresearchaqualitativestudy |