Cargando…

Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study

Multiple studies have documented major limitations in the informed consent process for the recruitment of clinical research participants. One challenging aspect of this process is successful communication of risks and benefits to potential research participants. This study explored the opinions and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nusbaum, Lika, Douglas, Brenda, Damus, Karla, Paasche-Orlow, Michael, Estrella-Luna, Neenah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5613795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28975139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333393617732017
_version_ 1783266324975190016
author Nusbaum, Lika
Douglas, Brenda
Damus, Karla
Paasche-Orlow, Michael
Estrella-Luna, Neenah
author_facet Nusbaum, Lika
Douglas, Brenda
Damus, Karla
Paasche-Orlow, Michael
Estrella-Luna, Neenah
author_sort Nusbaum, Lika
collection PubMed
description Multiple studies have documented major limitations in the informed consent process for the recruitment of clinical research participants. One challenging aspect of this process is successful communication of risks and benefits to potential research participants. This study explored the opinions and attitudes of informed consent experts about conveying risks and benefits to inform the development of a survey about the perspectives of research nurses who are responsible for obtaining informed consent for clinical trials. The major themes identified were strategies for risks and benefits communication, ensuring comprehension, and preparation for the role of the consent administrator. From the experts’ perspective, inadequate education and training of the research staff responsible for informed consent process contribute to deficiencies in the informed consent process and risks and benefits communication. Inconsistencies in experts’ opinions and critique of certain widely used communication practices require further consideration and additional research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5613795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56137952017-10-03 Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study Nusbaum, Lika Douglas, Brenda Damus, Karla Paasche-Orlow, Michael Estrella-Luna, Neenah Glob Qual Nurs Res Article Multiple studies have documented major limitations in the informed consent process for the recruitment of clinical research participants. One challenging aspect of this process is successful communication of risks and benefits to potential research participants. This study explored the opinions and attitudes of informed consent experts about conveying risks and benefits to inform the development of a survey about the perspectives of research nurses who are responsible for obtaining informed consent for clinical trials. The major themes identified were strategies for risks and benefits communication, ensuring comprehension, and preparation for the role of the consent administrator. From the experts’ perspective, inadequate education and training of the research staff responsible for informed consent process contribute to deficiencies in the informed consent process and risks and benefits communication. Inconsistencies in experts’ opinions and critique of certain widely used communication practices require further consideration and additional research. SAGE Publications 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5613795/ /pubmed/28975139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333393617732017 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Nusbaum, Lika
Douglas, Brenda
Damus, Karla
Paasche-Orlow, Michael
Estrella-Luna, Neenah
Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study
title Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study
title_full Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study
title_short Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study
title_sort communicating risks and benefits in informed consent for research: a qualitative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5613795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28975139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333393617732017
work_keys_str_mv AT nusbaumlika communicatingrisksandbenefitsininformedconsentforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT douglasbrenda communicatingrisksandbenefitsininformedconsentforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT damuskarla communicatingrisksandbenefitsininformedconsentforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT paascheorlowmichael communicatingrisksandbenefitsininformedconsentforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT estrellalunaneenah communicatingrisksandbenefitsininformedconsentforresearchaqualitativestudy