Cargando…
The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials
The Salford Lung Study (SLS) of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a practical, community-based, randomized, open-label pragmatic study on the efficacy and safety of the once-daily dry powder inhaler that combines the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5614786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033625 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/POR.S144157 |
_version_ | 1783266465444528128 |
---|---|
author | Albertson, Timothy E Murin, Susan Sutter, Mark E Chenoweth, James A |
author_facet | Albertson, Timothy E Murin, Susan Sutter, Mark E Chenoweth, James A |
author_sort | Albertson, Timothy E |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Salford Lung Study (SLS) of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a practical, community-based, randomized, open-label pragmatic study on the efficacy and safety of the once-daily dry powder inhaler that combines the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) with the long-acting beta(2) agonist vilanterol (VI). The asthma component of the SLS is not yet reported but the COPD component, done over a 12-month period, found a statistically significant 8.4% reduction in COPD exacerbations when compared to usual care. No differences in adverse events, including serious adverse events and pneumonia, were noted. The importance of real-world findings, such as those found in the SLS COPD trial with inhaled FF/VI, is discussed in comparison to classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with inhaled FF/VI in COPD patients. The real-world, community-based pragmatic RCT like the SLS provides additional generalizable data with direct clinical applicability and potential usefulness in the development of practice guidelines. The results from the SLS, along with those of large and small RCTs, are supportive of the use of once-daily FF/VI in COPD maintenance therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5614786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56147862017-10-13 The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials Albertson, Timothy E Murin, Susan Sutter, Mark E Chenoweth, James A Pragmat Obs Res Review The Salford Lung Study (SLS) of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a practical, community-based, randomized, open-label pragmatic study on the efficacy and safety of the once-daily dry powder inhaler that combines the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) with the long-acting beta(2) agonist vilanterol (VI). The asthma component of the SLS is not yet reported but the COPD component, done over a 12-month period, found a statistically significant 8.4% reduction in COPD exacerbations when compared to usual care. No differences in adverse events, including serious adverse events and pneumonia, were noted. The importance of real-world findings, such as those found in the SLS COPD trial with inhaled FF/VI, is discussed in comparison to classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with inhaled FF/VI in COPD patients. The real-world, community-based pragmatic RCT like the SLS provides additional generalizable data with direct clinical applicability and potential usefulness in the development of practice guidelines. The results from the SLS, along with those of large and small RCTs, are supportive of the use of once-daily FF/VI in COPD maintenance therapy. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5614786/ /pubmed/29033625 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/POR.S144157 Text en © 2017 Albertson et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Albertson, Timothy E Murin, Susan Sutter, Mark E Chenoweth, James A The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials |
title | The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials |
title_full | The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials |
title_fullStr | The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials |
title_short | The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials |
title_sort | salford lung study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to copd and asthma in clinical trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5614786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033625 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/POR.S144157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albertsontimothye thesalfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials AT murinsusan thesalfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials AT suttermarke thesalfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials AT chenowethjamesa thesalfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials AT albertsontimothye salfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials AT murinsusan salfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials AT suttermarke salfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials AT chenowethjamesa salfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials |