Cargando…

The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials

The Salford Lung Study (SLS) of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a practical, community-based, randomized, open-label pragmatic study on the efficacy and safety of the once-daily dry powder inhaler that combines the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albertson, Timothy E, Murin, Susan, Sutter, Mark E, Chenoweth, James A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5614786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033625
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/POR.S144157
_version_ 1783266465444528128
author Albertson, Timothy E
Murin, Susan
Sutter, Mark E
Chenoweth, James A
author_facet Albertson, Timothy E
Murin, Susan
Sutter, Mark E
Chenoweth, James A
author_sort Albertson, Timothy E
collection PubMed
description The Salford Lung Study (SLS) of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a practical, community-based, randomized, open-label pragmatic study on the efficacy and safety of the once-daily dry powder inhaler that combines the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) with the long-acting beta(2) agonist vilanterol (VI). The asthma component of the SLS is not yet reported but the COPD component, done over a 12-month period, found a statistically significant 8.4% reduction in COPD exacerbations when compared to usual care. No differences in adverse events, including serious adverse events and pneumonia, were noted. The importance of real-world findings, such as those found in the SLS COPD trial with inhaled FF/VI, is discussed in comparison to classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with inhaled FF/VI in COPD patients. The real-world, community-based pragmatic RCT like the SLS provides additional generalizable data with direct clinical applicability and potential usefulness in the development of practice guidelines. The results from the SLS, along with those of large and small RCTs, are supportive of the use of once-daily FF/VI in COPD maintenance therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5614786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56147862017-10-13 The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials Albertson, Timothy E Murin, Susan Sutter, Mark E Chenoweth, James A Pragmat Obs Res Review The Salford Lung Study (SLS) of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a practical, community-based, randomized, open-label pragmatic study on the efficacy and safety of the once-daily dry powder inhaler that combines the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) with the long-acting beta(2) agonist vilanterol (VI). The asthma component of the SLS is not yet reported but the COPD component, done over a 12-month period, found a statistically significant 8.4% reduction in COPD exacerbations when compared to usual care. No differences in adverse events, including serious adverse events and pneumonia, were noted. The importance of real-world findings, such as those found in the SLS COPD trial with inhaled FF/VI, is discussed in comparison to classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with inhaled FF/VI in COPD patients. The real-world, community-based pragmatic RCT like the SLS provides additional generalizable data with direct clinical applicability and potential usefulness in the development of practice guidelines. The results from the SLS, along with those of large and small RCTs, are supportive of the use of once-daily FF/VI in COPD maintenance therapy. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5614786/ /pubmed/29033625 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/POR.S144157 Text en © 2017 Albertson et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Albertson, Timothy E
Murin, Susan
Sutter, Mark E
Chenoweth, James A
The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials
title The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials
title_full The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials
title_fullStr The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials
title_short The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials
title_sort salford lung study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to copd and asthma in clinical trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5614786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033625
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/POR.S144157
work_keys_str_mv AT albertsontimothye thesalfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials
AT murinsusan thesalfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials
AT suttermarke thesalfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials
AT chenowethjamesa thesalfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials
AT albertsontimothye salfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials
AT murinsusan salfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials
AT suttermarke salfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials
AT chenowethjamesa salfordlungstudyapioneeringcomparativeeffectivenessapproachtocopdandasthmainclinicaltrials