Cargando…

That Escalated Quickly—Planning to Ignore RPE Can Backfire

Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) are routinely assessed in exercise science and RPE is substantially associated with physiological criterion measures. According to the psychobiological model of endurance, RPE is a central limiting factor in performance. While RPE is known to be affected by psycho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bieleke, Maik, Wolff, Wanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5614960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00736
_version_ 1783266486034366464
author Bieleke, Maik
Wolff, Wanja
author_facet Bieleke, Maik
Wolff, Wanja
author_sort Bieleke, Maik
collection PubMed
description Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) are routinely assessed in exercise science and RPE is substantially associated with physiological criterion measures. According to the psychobiological model of endurance, RPE is a central limiting factor in performance. While RPE is known to be affected by psychological manipulations, it remains to be examined whether RPE can be self-regulated during static muscular endurance exercises to enhance performance. In this experiment, we investigate the effectiveness of the widely used and recommended self-regulation strategy of if-then planning (i.e., implementation intentions) in down-regulating RPE and improving performance in a static muscular endurance task. 62 female students (age: M = 23.7 years, SD = 4.0) were randomly assigned to an implementation intention or a control condition and performed a static muscular endurance task. They held two intertwined rings as long as possible while avoiding contacts between the rings. In the implementation intention condition, participants had an if-then plan: “If the task becomes too strenuous for me, then I ignore the strain and tell myself: Keep going!” Every 25 ± 10 s participants reported their RPE along with their perceived pain. Endurance performance was measured as time to failure, along with contact errors as a measure of performance quality. No differences emerged between implementation intention and control participants regarding time to failure and performance quality. However, mixed-effects model analyses revealed a significant Time-to-Failure × Condition interaction for RPE. Compared to the control condition, participants in the implementation intention condition reported substantially greater increases in RPE during the second half of the task and reached higher total values of RPE before task termination. A similar but weaker pattern evinced for perceived pain. Our results demonstrate that RPE during an endurance task can be self-regulated with if-then plans. This finding is particularly important given how frequently RPE is used in exercise science as a correlate of physiological processes that ultimately limit performance. Unexpectedly, participants with implementation intentions reported higher RPE than control participants. This suggests that strategies to self-regulate RPE might have ironic effects that hamper performance, maybe by increasing attention to RPE. This implication is important for exercise physiologists, athletes and coaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5614960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56149602017-10-10 That Escalated Quickly—Planning to Ignore RPE Can Backfire Bieleke, Maik Wolff, Wanja Front Physiol Physiology Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) are routinely assessed in exercise science and RPE is substantially associated with physiological criterion measures. According to the psychobiological model of endurance, RPE is a central limiting factor in performance. While RPE is known to be affected by psychological manipulations, it remains to be examined whether RPE can be self-regulated during static muscular endurance exercises to enhance performance. In this experiment, we investigate the effectiveness of the widely used and recommended self-regulation strategy of if-then planning (i.e., implementation intentions) in down-regulating RPE and improving performance in a static muscular endurance task. 62 female students (age: M = 23.7 years, SD = 4.0) were randomly assigned to an implementation intention or a control condition and performed a static muscular endurance task. They held two intertwined rings as long as possible while avoiding contacts between the rings. In the implementation intention condition, participants had an if-then plan: “If the task becomes too strenuous for me, then I ignore the strain and tell myself: Keep going!” Every 25 ± 10 s participants reported their RPE along with their perceived pain. Endurance performance was measured as time to failure, along with contact errors as a measure of performance quality. No differences emerged between implementation intention and control participants regarding time to failure and performance quality. However, mixed-effects model analyses revealed a significant Time-to-Failure × Condition interaction for RPE. Compared to the control condition, participants in the implementation intention condition reported substantially greater increases in RPE during the second half of the task and reached higher total values of RPE before task termination. A similar but weaker pattern evinced for perceived pain. Our results demonstrate that RPE during an endurance task can be self-regulated with if-then plans. This finding is particularly important given how frequently RPE is used in exercise science as a correlate of physiological processes that ultimately limit performance. Unexpectedly, participants with implementation intentions reported higher RPE than control participants. This suggests that strategies to self-regulate RPE might have ironic effects that hamper performance, maybe by increasing attention to RPE. This implication is important for exercise physiologists, athletes and coaches. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5614960/ /pubmed/29018359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00736 Text en Copyright © 2017 Bieleke and Wolff. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Bieleke, Maik
Wolff, Wanja
That Escalated Quickly—Planning to Ignore RPE Can Backfire
title That Escalated Quickly—Planning to Ignore RPE Can Backfire
title_full That Escalated Quickly—Planning to Ignore RPE Can Backfire
title_fullStr That Escalated Quickly—Planning to Ignore RPE Can Backfire
title_full_unstemmed That Escalated Quickly—Planning to Ignore RPE Can Backfire
title_short That Escalated Quickly—Planning to Ignore RPE Can Backfire
title_sort that escalated quickly—planning to ignore rpe can backfire
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5614960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00736
work_keys_str_mv AT bielekemaik thatescalatedquicklyplanningtoignorerpecanbackfire
AT wolffwanja thatescalatedquicklyplanningtoignorerpecanbackfire