Cargando…

Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study

BACKGROUND: Various special techniques for blind bedside transpyloric tube placement have been introduced into clinical practice. However, transpyloric spiral tube placement facilitated by a blind bedside method has not yet been reported. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lv, Bo, Hu, Linhui, Chen, Lifang, Hu, Bei, Zhang, Yanlin, Ye, Heng, Sun, Cheng, Zhang, Xiunong, Lan, Huilan, Chen, Chunbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5615440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28950897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1839-2
_version_ 1783266585887113216
author Lv, Bo
Hu, Linhui
Chen, Lifang
Hu, Bei
Zhang, Yanlin
Ye, Heng
Sun, Cheng
Zhang, Xiunong
Lan, Huilan
Chen, Chunbo
author_facet Lv, Bo
Hu, Linhui
Chen, Lifang
Hu, Bei
Zhang, Yanlin
Ye, Heng
Sun, Cheng
Zhang, Xiunong
Lan, Huilan
Chen, Chunbo
author_sort Lv, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various special techniques for blind bedside transpyloric tube placement have been introduced into clinical practice. However, transpyloric spiral tube placement facilitated by a blind bedside method has not yet been reported. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients. METHODS: This prospective, tricentric, observational study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three tertiary hospitals. A total of 127 consecutive patients with failed spontaneous transpyloric spiral tube migration despite using prokinetic agents and still required enteral nutrition for more than 3 days were included. The spiral tube was inserted postpylorically using the blind bedside technique. All patients received metoclopramide intravenously prior to tube insertion. The exact tube tip position was determined by radiography. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of postpyloric spiral tube placement. Secondary efficacy endpoints were success rate of a spiral tube placed in the third portion of the duodenum (D3) or beyond, success rate of placement in the proximal jejunum, time to insertion, length of insertion, and number of attempts. Safety endpoints were metoclopramide-related and major adverse tube-associated events. RESULTS: In 81.9% of patients, the spiral feeding tubes were placed postpylorically; of these, 55.1% were placed in D3 or beyond and 33.9% were placed in the proximal jejunum, with a median time to insertion of 14 min and an average number of attempts of 1.4. The mean length of insertion was 95.6 cm. The adverse event incidence was 26.0%, and no serious adverse event was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube, as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients, is safe and effective. This technique may facilitate the early initiation of postpyloric feeding in the ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-OPN-16008206. Registered on 1 April 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5615440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56154402017-09-28 Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study Lv, Bo Hu, Linhui Chen, Lifang Hu, Bei Zhang, Yanlin Ye, Heng Sun, Cheng Zhang, Xiunong Lan, Huilan Chen, Chunbo Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Various special techniques for blind bedside transpyloric tube placement have been introduced into clinical practice. However, transpyloric spiral tube placement facilitated by a blind bedside method has not yet been reported. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients. METHODS: This prospective, tricentric, observational study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three tertiary hospitals. A total of 127 consecutive patients with failed spontaneous transpyloric spiral tube migration despite using prokinetic agents and still required enteral nutrition for more than 3 days were included. The spiral tube was inserted postpylorically using the blind bedside technique. All patients received metoclopramide intravenously prior to tube insertion. The exact tube tip position was determined by radiography. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of postpyloric spiral tube placement. Secondary efficacy endpoints were success rate of a spiral tube placed in the third portion of the duodenum (D3) or beyond, success rate of placement in the proximal jejunum, time to insertion, length of insertion, and number of attempts. Safety endpoints were metoclopramide-related and major adverse tube-associated events. RESULTS: In 81.9% of patients, the spiral feeding tubes were placed postpylorically; of these, 55.1% were placed in D3 or beyond and 33.9% were placed in the proximal jejunum, with a median time to insertion of 14 min and an average number of attempts of 1.4. The mean length of insertion was 95.6 cm. The adverse event incidence was 26.0%, and no serious adverse event was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube, as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients, is safe and effective. This technique may facilitate the early initiation of postpyloric feeding in the ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-OPN-16008206. Registered on 1 April 2016. BioMed Central 2017-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5615440/ /pubmed/28950897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1839-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lv, Bo
Hu, Linhui
Chen, Lifang
Hu, Bei
Zhang, Yanlin
Ye, Heng
Sun, Cheng
Zhang, Xiunong
Lan, Huilan
Chen, Chunbo
Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study
title Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study
title_full Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study
title_fullStr Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study
title_full_unstemmed Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study
title_short Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study
title_sort blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5615440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28950897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1839-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lvbo blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy
AT hulinhui blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy
AT chenlifang blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy
AT hubei blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy
AT zhangyanlin blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy
AT yeheng blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy
AT suncheng blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy
AT zhangxiunong blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy
AT lanhuilan blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy
AT chenchunbo blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy