Cargando…
Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study
BACKGROUND: Various special techniques for blind bedside transpyloric tube placement have been introduced into clinical practice. However, transpyloric spiral tube placement facilitated by a blind bedside method has not yet been reported. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5615440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28950897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1839-2 |
_version_ | 1783266585887113216 |
---|---|
author | Lv, Bo Hu, Linhui Chen, Lifang Hu, Bei Zhang, Yanlin Ye, Heng Sun, Cheng Zhang, Xiunong Lan, Huilan Chen, Chunbo |
author_facet | Lv, Bo Hu, Linhui Chen, Lifang Hu, Bei Zhang, Yanlin Ye, Heng Sun, Cheng Zhang, Xiunong Lan, Huilan Chen, Chunbo |
author_sort | Lv, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Various special techniques for blind bedside transpyloric tube placement have been introduced into clinical practice. However, transpyloric spiral tube placement facilitated by a blind bedside method has not yet been reported. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients. METHODS: This prospective, tricentric, observational study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three tertiary hospitals. A total of 127 consecutive patients with failed spontaneous transpyloric spiral tube migration despite using prokinetic agents and still required enteral nutrition for more than 3 days were included. The spiral tube was inserted postpylorically using the blind bedside technique. All patients received metoclopramide intravenously prior to tube insertion. The exact tube tip position was determined by radiography. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of postpyloric spiral tube placement. Secondary efficacy endpoints were success rate of a spiral tube placed in the third portion of the duodenum (D3) or beyond, success rate of placement in the proximal jejunum, time to insertion, length of insertion, and number of attempts. Safety endpoints were metoclopramide-related and major adverse tube-associated events. RESULTS: In 81.9% of patients, the spiral feeding tubes were placed postpylorically; of these, 55.1% were placed in D3 or beyond and 33.9% were placed in the proximal jejunum, with a median time to insertion of 14 min and an average number of attempts of 1.4. The mean length of insertion was 95.6 cm. The adverse event incidence was 26.0%, and no serious adverse event was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube, as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients, is safe and effective. This technique may facilitate the early initiation of postpyloric feeding in the ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-OPN-16008206. Registered on 1 April 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5615440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56154402017-09-28 Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study Lv, Bo Hu, Linhui Chen, Lifang Hu, Bei Zhang, Yanlin Ye, Heng Sun, Cheng Zhang, Xiunong Lan, Huilan Chen, Chunbo Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Various special techniques for blind bedside transpyloric tube placement have been introduced into clinical practice. However, transpyloric spiral tube placement facilitated by a blind bedside method has not yet been reported. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients. METHODS: This prospective, tricentric, observational study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three tertiary hospitals. A total of 127 consecutive patients with failed spontaneous transpyloric spiral tube migration despite using prokinetic agents and still required enteral nutrition for more than 3 days were included. The spiral tube was inserted postpylorically using the blind bedside technique. All patients received metoclopramide intravenously prior to tube insertion. The exact tube tip position was determined by radiography. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of postpyloric spiral tube placement. Secondary efficacy endpoints were success rate of a spiral tube placed in the third portion of the duodenum (D3) or beyond, success rate of placement in the proximal jejunum, time to insertion, length of insertion, and number of attempts. Safety endpoints were metoclopramide-related and major adverse tube-associated events. RESULTS: In 81.9% of patients, the spiral feeding tubes were placed postpylorically; of these, 55.1% were placed in D3 or beyond and 33.9% were placed in the proximal jejunum, with a median time to insertion of 14 min and an average number of attempts of 1.4. The mean length of insertion was 95.6 cm. The adverse event incidence was 26.0%, and no serious adverse event was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube, as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients, is safe and effective. This technique may facilitate the early initiation of postpyloric feeding in the ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-OPN-16008206. Registered on 1 April 2016. BioMed Central 2017-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5615440/ /pubmed/28950897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1839-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Lv, Bo Hu, Linhui Chen, Lifang Hu, Bei Zhang, Yanlin Ye, Heng Sun, Cheng Zhang, Xiunong Lan, Huilan Chen, Chunbo Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study |
title | Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study |
title_full | Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study |
title_fullStr | Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study |
title_short | Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study |
title_sort | blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5615440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28950897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1839-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lvbo blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy AT hulinhui blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy AT chenlifang blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy AT hubei blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy AT zhangyanlin blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy AT yeheng blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy AT suncheng blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy AT zhangxiunong blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy AT lanhuilan blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy AT chenchunbo blindbedsidepostpyloricplacementofspiraltubeasrescuetherapyincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivetricentricobservationalstudy |