Cargando…

Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in medical technology and public health practice at the global level over the past millennia, infectious diseases are still the leading causes of death in most resource limited countries. Stronger infectious disease surveillance and response systems in developed countrie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandyata, Chomba Brian, Olowski, Linda Kampata, Mutale, Wilbroad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5615443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28950834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4791-9
_version_ 1783266586608533504
author Mandyata, Chomba Brian
Olowski, Linda Kampata
Mutale, Wilbroad
author_facet Mandyata, Chomba Brian
Olowski, Linda Kampata
Mutale, Wilbroad
author_sort Mandyata, Chomba Brian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite advances in medical technology and public health practice at the global level over the past millennia, infectious diseases are still the leading causes of death in most resource limited countries. Stronger infectious disease surveillance and response systems in developed countries facilitated the near elimination of infectious disease related deaths in those countries. Today, low-income countries are following this path by strengthening disease surveillance and response strategies that would help reverse the trend in infectious disease associated morbidity and mortality cases. In 2000, Zambia adopted the World Health Organisation Regional Office for Africa’s (WHO-AFRO) Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Strategy (IDSR) to monitor, prevent and control priority notifiable infectious diseases in the country. Through this strategy, activities pertaining to disease surveillance are coordinated and streamlined to take advantage of similar surveillance functions, skills, resources and targeted populations. The purpose of the study was to investigate and report on the existing challenges in the implementation of the IDSR strategy in a resource limited country from a health worker perspective. METHODS: A qualitative study approach was used to achieve the study aim. Data was collected through key informant interviews with selected persons at the Lusaka Province Health Office (LPHO); Lusaka and Chongwe District Health Management Team Offices; and four selected health facilities in the two districts (two from each). Thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the qualitative data. RESULTS: The major successes included operationalised response and epidemic preparedness at all levels (National to district); full-time staff and budget dedicated to disease surveillance at all levels and adoption of the 2010 World Health Organisations’ Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Strategy technical guidelines to the Zambian context. Several challenges hampered effective implementation. These include inadequate trained human resources, poor infrastructure and coordination challenges. CONCLUSION: The implementation of IDSR strategy in Zambia has recorded some successes. However, several gaps hinder effective implementation. It is imperative that these gaps are addressed for Zambia to have a robust surveillance system that could inform policy in a comprehensive and timely manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5615443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56154432017-09-28 Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective Mandyata, Chomba Brian Olowski, Linda Kampata Mutale, Wilbroad BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite advances in medical technology and public health practice at the global level over the past millennia, infectious diseases are still the leading causes of death in most resource limited countries. Stronger infectious disease surveillance and response systems in developed countries facilitated the near elimination of infectious disease related deaths in those countries. Today, low-income countries are following this path by strengthening disease surveillance and response strategies that would help reverse the trend in infectious disease associated morbidity and mortality cases. In 2000, Zambia adopted the World Health Organisation Regional Office for Africa’s (WHO-AFRO) Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Strategy (IDSR) to monitor, prevent and control priority notifiable infectious diseases in the country. Through this strategy, activities pertaining to disease surveillance are coordinated and streamlined to take advantage of similar surveillance functions, skills, resources and targeted populations. The purpose of the study was to investigate and report on the existing challenges in the implementation of the IDSR strategy in a resource limited country from a health worker perspective. METHODS: A qualitative study approach was used to achieve the study aim. Data was collected through key informant interviews with selected persons at the Lusaka Province Health Office (LPHO); Lusaka and Chongwe District Health Management Team Offices; and four selected health facilities in the two districts (two from each). Thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the qualitative data. RESULTS: The major successes included operationalised response and epidemic preparedness at all levels (National to district); full-time staff and budget dedicated to disease surveillance at all levels and adoption of the 2010 World Health Organisations’ Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Strategy technical guidelines to the Zambian context. Several challenges hampered effective implementation. These include inadequate trained human resources, poor infrastructure and coordination challenges. CONCLUSION: The implementation of IDSR strategy in Zambia has recorded some successes. However, several gaps hinder effective implementation. It is imperative that these gaps are addressed for Zambia to have a robust surveillance system that could inform policy in a comprehensive and timely manner. BioMed Central 2017-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5615443/ /pubmed/28950834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4791-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mandyata, Chomba Brian
Olowski, Linda Kampata
Mutale, Wilbroad
Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective
title Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective
title_full Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective
title_fullStr Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective
title_full_unstemmed Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective
title_short Challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in Zambia: a health worker perspective
title_sort challenges of implementing the integrated disease surveillance and response strategy in zambia: a health worker perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5615443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28950834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4791-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mandyatachombabrian challengesofimplementingtheintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsestrategyinzambiaahealthworkerperspective
AT olowskilindakampata challengesofimplementingtheintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsestrategyinzambiaahealthworkerperspective
AT mutalewilbroad challengesofimplementingtheintegrateddiseasesurveillanceandresponsestrategyinzambiaahealthworkerperspective