Cargando…
Preperitoneal Bladder Augmentation: Feasibility and Results
INTRODUCTION: Bladder augmentation is an important part of pediatric reconstructive urology. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility and results of our technique of preperitoneal bladder augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three children underwent preperitoneal bladder augmentatio...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5615892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974870 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.214443 |
_version_ | 1783266685194600448 |
---|---|
author | Ghosh, Dhruva Nath Karl, Sampath Sen, Sudipta |
author_facet | Ghosh, Dhruva Nath Karl, Sampath Sen, Sudipta |
author_sort | Ghosh, Dhruva Nath |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Bladder augmentation is an important part of pediatric reconstructive urology. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility and results of our technique of preperitoneal bladder augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three children underwent preperitoneal bladder augmentation for small inelastic bladders who had failed medical management or needed undiversion. The underlying diagnosis included neurogenic bladder, valve bladder, bladder exstrophy, non-neurogenic neurogenic, ectopic ureters, and urogenital sinus. The operative procedure involved placing the entire augmentation in the preperitoneal or subcutaneous space after bivalving the native bladder. The augment segment of the bowel with its pedicle was brought into the preperitoneal space through a small opening in the parietal peritoneum. A Mitrofanoff port was also provided where needed. RESULTS: Preperitoneal augmentation provided an adequately compliant, good volume bladder except in children with bladder exstrophy or previous abdominal surgery. There was a good cystometric recovery, with resolution of hydronephrosis and incontinence. Vesicoureteral reflux resolved in 24 of 26 units. In the 13 children who were uremic preoperatively, there was a significant decrease in serum creatinine levels, although 9 children continued to have supra-normal serum creatinine. Surgical complications seen were within expectations. There was no incidence of intraperitoneal leak, which is the main projected benefit of this procedure over the traditional “intraperitoneal” method of augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The preperitoneal augmentation provides an adequate, safe, and low-pressure reservoir of urine except in cases of bladder exstrophy and previous abdominal surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5615892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56158922017-10-04 Preperitoneal Bladder Augmentation: Feasibility and Results Ghosh, Dhruva Nath Karl, Sampath Sen, Sudipta J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Bladder augmentation is an important part of pediatric reconstructive urology. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility and results of our technique of preperitoneal bladder augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three children underwent preperitoneal bladder augmentation for small inelastic bladders who had failed medical management or needed undiversion. The underlying diagnosis included neurogenic bladder, valve bladder, bladder exstrophy, non-neurogenic neurogenic, ectopic ureters, and urogenital sinus. The operative procedure involved placing the entire augmentation in the preperitoneal or subcutaneous space after bivalving the native bladder. The augment segment of the bowel with its pedicle was brought into the preperitoneal space through a small opening in the parietal peritoneum. A Mitrofanoff port was also provided where needed. RESULTS: Preperitoneal augmentation provided an adequately compliant, good volume bladder except in children with bladder exstrophy or previous abdominal surgery. There was a good cystometric recovery, with resolution of hydronephrosis and incontinence. Vesicoureteral reflux resolved in 24 of 26 units. In the 13 children who were uremic preoperatively, there was a significant decrease in serum creatinine levels, although 9 children continued to have supra-normal serum creatinine. Surgical complications seen were within expectations. There was no incidence of intraperitoneal leak, which is the main projected benefit of this procedure over the traditional “intraperitoneal” method of augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The preperitoneal augmentation provides an adequate, safe, and low-pressure reservoir of urine except in cases of bladder exstrophy and previous abdominal surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5615892/ /pubmed/28974870 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.214443 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ghosh, Dhruva Nath Karl, Sampath Sen, Sudipta Preperitoneal Bladder Augmentation: Feasibility and Results |
title | Preperitoneal Bladder Augmentation: Feasibility and Results |
title_full | Preperitoneal Bladder Augmentation: Feasibility and Results |
title_fullStr | Preperitoneal Bladder Augmentation: Feasibility and Results |
title_full_unstemmed | Preperitoneal Bladder Augmentation: Feasibility and Results |
title_short | Preperitoneal Bladder Augmentation: Feasibility and Results |
title_sort | preperitoneal bladder augmentation: feasibility and results |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5615892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974870 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.214443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghoshdhruvanath preperitonealbladderaugmentationfeasibilityandresults AT karlsampath preperitonealbladderaugmentationfeasibilityandresults AT sensudipta preperitonealbladderaugmentationfeasibilityandresults |