Cargando…
Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery
PURPOSE: The study was aimed to compare online 6 degree-of-freedom image registrations of TrueBeam cone-beam computed tomography and BrainLab ExacTrac X-ray imaging systems for intracranial radiosurgery. METHODS: Phantom and patient studies were performed on a Varian TrueBeam STx linear accelerator...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5616049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28462690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034616683069 |
_version_ | 1783266715491106816 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jun Shi, Wenyin Andrews, David Werner-Wasik, Maria Lu, Bo Yu, Yan Dicker, Adam Liu, Haisong |
author_facet | Li, Jun Shi, Wenyin Andrews, David Werner-Wasik, Maria Lu, Bo Yu, Yan Dicker, Adam Liu, Haisong |
author_sort | Li, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The study was aimed to compare online 6 degree-of-freedom image registrations of TrueBeam cone-beam computed tomography and BrainLab ExacTrac X-ray imaging systems for intracranial radiosurgery. METHODS: Phantom and patient studies were performed on a Varian TrueBeam STx linear accelerator (version 2.5), which is integrated with a BrainLab ExacTrac imaging system (version 6.1.1). The phantom study was based on a Rando head phantom and was designed to evaluate isocenter location dependence of the image registrations. Ten isocenters at various locations representing clinical treatment sites were selected in the phantom. Cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac X-ray images were taken when the phantom was located at each isocenter. The patient study included 34 patients. Cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac X-ray images were taken at each patient’s treatment position. The 6 degree-of-freedom image registrations were performed on cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac, and residual errors calculated from cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac were compared. RESULTS: In the phantom study, the average residual error differences (absolute values) between cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac image registrations were 0.17 ± 0.11 mm, 0.36 ± 0.20 mm, and 0.25 ± 0.11 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The average residual error differences in the rotation, roll, and pitch were 0.34° ± 0.08°, 0.13° ± 0.09°, and 0.12° ± 0.10°, respectively. In the patient study, the average residual error differences in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions were 0.20 ± 0.16 mm, 0.30 ± 0.18 mm, 0.21 ± 0.18 mm, respectively. The average residual error differences in the rotation, roll, and pitch were 0.40°± 0.16°, 0.17° ± 0.13°, and 0.20° ± 0.14°, respectively. Overall, the average residual error differences were <0.4 mm in the translational directions and <0.5° in the rotational directions. ExacTrac X-ray image registration is comparable to TrueBeam cone-beam computed tomography image registration in intracranial treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5616049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56160492017-10-03 Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery Li, Jun Shi, Wenyin Andrews, David Werner-Wasik, Maria Lu, Bo Yu, Yan Dicker, Adam Liu, Haisong Technol Cancer Res Treat Articles PURPOSE: The study was aimed to compare online 6 degree-of-freedom image registrations of TrueBeam cone-beam computed tomography and BrainLab ExacTrac X-ray imaging systems for intracranial radiosurgery. METHODS: Phantom and patient studies were performed on a Varian TrueBeam STx linear accelerator (version 2.5), which is integrated with a BrainLab ExacTrac imaging system (version 6.1.1). The phantom study was based on a Rando head phantom and was designed to evaluate isocenter location dependence of the image registrations. Ten isocenters at various locations representing clinical treatment sites were selected in the phantom. Cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac X-ray images were taken when the phantom was located at each isocenter. The patient study included 34 patients. Cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac X-ray images were taken at each patient’s treatment position. The 6 degree-of-freedom image registrations were performed on cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac, and residual errors calculated from cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac were compared. RESULTS: In the phantom study, the average residual error differences (absolute values) between cone-beam computed tomography and ExacTrac image registrations were 0.17 ± 0.11 mm, 0.36 ± 0.20 mm, and 0.25 ± 0.11 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The average residual error differences in the rotation, roll, and pitch were 0.34° ± 0.08°, 0.13° ± 0.09°, and 0.12° ± 0.10°, respectively. In the patient study, the average residual error differences in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions were 0.20 ± 0.16 mm, 0.30 ± 0.18 mm, 0.21 ± 0.18 mm, respectively. The average residual error differences in the rotation, roll, and pitch were 0.40°± 0.16°, 0.17° ± 0.13°, and 0.20° ± 0.14°, respectively. Overall, the average residual error differences were <0.4 mm in the translational directions and <0.5° in the rotational directions. ExacTrac X-ray image registration is comparable to TrueBeam cone-beam computed tomography image registration in intracranial treatments. SAGE Publications 2016-12-14 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5616049/ /pubmed/28462690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034616683069 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Li, Jun Shi, Wenyin Andrews, David Werner-Wasik, Maria Lu, Bo Yu, Yan Dicker, Adam Liu, Haisong Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery |
title | Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery |
title_full | Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery |
title_short | Comparison of Online 6 Degree-of-Freedom Image Registration of Varian TrueBeam Cone-Beam CT and BrainLab ExacTrac X-Ray for Intracranial Radiosurgery |
title_sort | comparison of online 6 degree-of-freedom image registration of varian truebeam cone-beam ct and brainlab exactrac x-ray for intracranial radiosurgery |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5616049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28462690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034616683069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijun comparisonofonline6degreeoffreedomimageregistrationofvariantruebeamconebeamctandbrainlabexactracxrayforintracranialradiosurgery AT shiwenyin comparisonofonline6degreeoffreedomimageregistrationofvariantruebeamconebeamctandbrainlabexactracxrayforintracranialradiosurgery AT andrewsdavid comparisonofonline6degreeoffreedomimageregistrationofvariantruebeamconebeamctandbrainlabexactracxrayforintracranialradiosurgery AT wernerwasikmaria comparisonofonline6degreeoffreedomimageregistrationofvariantruebeamconebeamctandbrainlabexactracxrayforintracranialradiosurgery AT lubo comparisonofonline6degreeoffreedomimageregistrationofvariantruebeamconebeamctandbrainlabexactracxrayforintracranialradiosurgery AT yuyan comparisonofonline6degreeoffreedomimageregistrationofvariantruebeamconebeamctandbrainlabexactracxrayforintracranialradiosurgery AT dickeradam comparisonofonline6degreeoffreedomimageregistrationofvariantruebeamconebeamctandbrainlabexactracxrayforintracranialradiosurgery AT liuhaisong comparisonofonline6degreeoffreedomimageregistrationofvariantruebeamconebeamctandbrainlabexactracxrayforintracranialradiosurgery |