Cargando…

A Dose–Volume Response Model for Brain Metastases Treated With Frameless Single-Fraction Robotic Radiosurgery: Seeking to Better Predict Response to Treatment

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To establish a dose–volume response relationship for brain metastases treated with single-fraction robotic stereotactic radiosurgery and identify predictors of local control. MATERIALS/METHODS: We reviewed a prospective institutional database of all patients treated for intact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amsbaugh, Mark J., Yusuf, Mehran B., Gaskins, Jeremy, Dragun, Anthony E., Dunlap, Neal, Guan, Timothy, Woo, Shiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5616050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28027696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034616685025
_version_ 1783266715714453504
author Amsbaugh, Mark J.
Yusuf, Mehran B.
Gaskins, Jeremy
Dragun, Anthony E.
Dunlap, Neal
Guan, Timothy
Woo, Shiao
author_facet Amsbaugh, Mark J.
Yusuf, Mehran B.
Gaskins, Jeremy
Dragun, Anthony E.
Dunlap, Neal
Guan, Timothy
Woo, Shiao
author_sort Amsbaugh, Mark J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To establish a dose–volume response relationship for brain metastases treated with single-fraction robotic stereotactic radiosurgery and identify predictors of local control. MATERIALS/METHODS: We reviewed a prospective institutional database of all patients treated for intact brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery alone using the CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system from 2012 to 2015. Tumor response was determined based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify predictors of outcome and establish a dose–volume response relationship. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the predictive capability of the relationship. RESULTS: There were 357 metastases evaluated in 111 patients with a median diameter of 8.14 mm (2.00-40.77 mm). At 6 and 12 months, local control was 86.9% and 82.2%, respectively. For lesions of similar volumes, higher maximum dose, mean dose, and minimum dose (all P values <.05) predicted for better local control. Tumor volume and diameter were strongly correlated, and a dose–volume response relationship was constructed using mean dose per lesion diameter (Gy/mm) that was predictive of local control (odds ratio: 1.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.70). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for local control and mean dose by volume was 0.6199 with a threshold of 2.05 Gy/mm (local failure 7.6% above and 17.3% below 2.05 Gy/mm). CONCLUSION: A dose–volume response relationship exists for brain metastases treated with robotic stereotactic radiosurgery. Mean dose per volume is strongly predictive of local control and can be potentially useful during stereotactic radiosurgery plan evaluation while respecting previously established dose constraints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5616050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56160502017-10-03 A Dose–Volume Response Model for Brain Metastases Treated With Frameless Single-Fraction Robotic Radiosurgery: Seeking to Better Predict Response to Treatment Amsbaugh, Mark J. Yusuf, Mehran B. Gaskins, Jeremy Dragun, Anthony E. Dunlap, Neal Guan, Timothy Woo, Shiao Technol Cancer Res Treat Articles PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To establish a dose–volume response relationship for brain metastases treated with single-fraction robotic stereotactic radiosurgery and identify predictors of local control. MATERIALS/METHODS: We reviewed a prospective institutional database of all patients treated for intact brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery alone using the CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system from 2012 to 2015. Tumor response was determined based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify predictors of outcome and establish a dose–volume response relationship. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the predictive capability of the relationship. RESULTS: There were 357 metastases evaluated in 111 patients with a median diameter of 8.14 mm (2.00-40.77 mm). At 6 and 12 months, local control was 86.9% and 82.2%, respectively. For lesions of similar volumes, higher maximum dose, mean dose, and minimum dose (all P values <.05) predicted for better local control. Tumor volume and diameter were strongly correlated, and a dose–volume response relationship was constructed using mean dose per lesion diameter (Gy/mm) that was predictive of local control (odds ratio: 1.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.70). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for local control and mean dose by volume was 0.6199 with a threshold of 2.05 Gy/mm (local failure 7.6% above and 17.3% below 2.05 Gy/mm). CONCLUSION: A dose–volume response relationship exists for brain metastases treated with robotic stereotactic radiosurgery. Mean dose per volume is strongly predictive of local control and can be potentially useful during stereotactic radiosurgery plan evaluation while respecting previously established dose constraints. SAGE Publications 2016-12-27 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5616050/ /pubmed/28027696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034616685025 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Amsbaugh, Mark J.
Yusuf, Mehran B.
Gaskins, Jeremy
Dragun, Anthony E.
Dunlap, Neal
Guan, Timothy
Woo, Shiao
A Dose–Volume Response Model for Brain Metastases Treated With Frameless Single-Fraction Robotic Radiosurgery: Seeking to Better Predict Response to Treatment
title A Dose–Volume Response Model for Brain Metastases Treated With Frameless Single-Fraction Robotic Radiosurgery: Seeking to Better Predict Response to Treatment
title_full A Dose–Volume Response Model for Brain Metastases Treated With Frameless Single-Fraction Robotic Radiosurgery: Seeking to Better Predict Response to Treatment
title_fullStr A Dose–Volume Response Model for Brain Metastases Treated With Frameless Single-Fraction Robotic Radiosurgery: Seeking to Better Predict Response to Treatment
title_full_unstemmed A Dose–Volume Response Model for Brain Metastases Treated With Frameless Single-Fraction Robotic Radiosurgery: Seeking to Better Predict Response to Treatment
title_short A Dose–Volume Response Model for Brain Metastases Treated With Frameless Single-Fraction Robotic Radiosurgery: Seeking to Better Predict Response to Treatment
title_sort dose–volume response model for brain metastases treated with frameless single-fraction robotic radiosurgery: seeking to better predict response to treatment
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5616050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28027696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034616685025
work_keys_str_mv AT amsbaughmarkj adosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT yusufmehranb adosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT gaskinsjeremy adosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT dragunanthonye adosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT dunlapneal adosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT guantimothy adosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT wooshiao adosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT amsbaughmarkj dosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT yusufmehranb dosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT gaskinsjeremy dosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT dragunanthonye dosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT dunlapneal dosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT guantimothy dosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment
AT wooshiao dosevolumeresponsemodelforbrainmetastasestreatedwithframelesssinglefractionroboticradiosurgeryseekingtobetterpredictresponsetotreatment