Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy
PURPOSE: To validate and compare the deformable image registration and parotid contour propagation process for head and neck magnetic resonance imaging in patients treated with radiotherapy using 3 different approaches—the commercial MIM, the open-source Elastix software, and an optimized version of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5616054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28168934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617691408 |
_version_ | 1783266716659220480 |
---|---|
author | Broggi, Sara Scalco, Elisa Belli, Maria Luisa Logghe, Gerlinde Verellen, Dirk Moriconi, Stefano Chiara, Anna Palmisano, Anna Mellone, Renata Fiorino, Claudio Rizzo, Giovanna |
author_facet | Broggi, Sara Scalco, Elisa Belli, Maria Luisa Logghe, Gerlinde Verellen, Dirk Moriconi, Stefano Chiara, Anna Palmisano, Anna Mellone, Renata Fiorino, Claudio Rizzo, Giovanna |
author_sort | Broggi, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To validate and compare the deformable image registration and parotid contour propagation process for head and neck magnetic resonance imaging in patients treated with radiotherapy using 3 different approaches—the commercial MIM, the open-source Elastix software, and an optimized version of it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with head and neck cancer previously treated with radiotherapy were considered. Deformable image registration and parotid contour propagation were evaluated by considering the magnetic resonance images acquired before and after the end of the treatment. Deformable image registration, based on free-form deformation method, and contour propagation available on MIM were compared to Elastix. Two different contour propagation approaches were implemented for Elastix software, a conventional one (DIR_Trx) and an optimized homemade version, based on mesh deformation (DIR_Mesh). The accuracy of these 3 approaches was estimated by comparing propagated to manual contours in terms of average symmetric distance, maximum symmetric distance, Dice similarity coefficient, sensitivity, and inclusiveness. RESULTS: A good agreement was generally found between the manual contours and the propagated ones, without differences among the 3 methods; in few critical cases with complex deformations, DIR_Mesh proved to be more accurate, having the lowest values of average symmetric distance and maximum symmetric distance and the highest value of Dice similarity coefficient, although nonsignificant. The average propagation errors with respect to the reference contours are lower than the voxel diagonal (2 mm), and Dice similarity coefficient is around 0.8 for all 3 methods. CONCLUSION: The 3 free-form deformation approaches were not significantly different in terms of deformable image registration accuracy and can be safely adopted for the registration and parotid contour propagation during radiotherapy on magnetic resonance imaging. More optimized approaches (as DIR_Mesh) could be preferable for critical deformations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5616054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56160542017-10-03 A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy Broggi, Sara Scalco, Elisa Belli, Maria Luisa Logghe, Gerlinde Verellen, Dirk Moriconi, Stefano Chiara, Anna Palmisano, Anna Mellone, Renata Fiorino, Claudio Rizzo, Giovanna Technol Cancer Res Treat Articles PURPOSE: To validate and compare the deformable image registration and parotid contour propagation process for head and neck magnetic resonance imaging in patients treated with radiotherapy using 3 different approaches—the commercial MIM, the open-source Elastix software, and an optimized version of it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with head and neck cancer previously treated with radiotherapy were considered. Deformable image registration and parotid contour propagation were evaluated by considering the magnetic resonance images acquired before and after the end of the treatment. Deformable image registration, based on free-form deformation method, and contour propagation available on MIM were compared to Elastix. Two different contour propagation approaches were implemented for Elastix software, a conventional one (DIR_Trx) and an optimized homemade version, based on mesh deformation (DIR_Mesh). The accuracy of these 3 approaches was estimated by comparing propagated to manual contours in terms of average symmetric distance, maximum symmetric distance, Dice similarity coefficient, sensitivity, and inclusiveness. RESULTS: A good agreement was generally found between the manual contours and the propagated ones, without differences among the 3 methods; in few critical cases with complex deformations, DIR_Mesh proved to be more accurate, having the lowest values of average symmetric distance and maximum symmetric distance and the highest value of Dice similarity coefficient, although nonsignificant. The average propagation errors with respect to the reference contours are lower than the voxel diagonal (2 mm), and Dice similarity coefficient is around 0.8 for all 3 methods. CONCLUSION: The 3 free-form deformation approaches were not significantly different in terms of deformable image registration accuracy and can be safely adopted for the registration and parotid contour propagation during radiotherapy on magnetic resonance imaging. More optimized approaches (as DIR_Mesh) could be preferable for critical deformations. SAGE Publications 2017-02-07 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5616054/ /pubmed/28168934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617691408 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Broggi, Sara Scalco, Elisa Belli, Maria Luisa Logghe, Gerlinde Verellen, Dirk Moriconi, Stefano Chiara, Anna Palmisano, Anna Mellone, Renata Fiorino, Claudio Rizzo, Giovanna A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of 3 different free-form deformable image registration and contour propagation methods for head and neck mri: the case of parotid changes during radiotherapy |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5616054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28168934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617691408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT broggisara acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT scalcoelisa acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT bellimarialuisa acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT logghegerlinde acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT verellendirk acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT moriconistefano acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT chiaraanna acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT palmisanoanna acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT mellonerenata acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT fiorinoclaudio acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT rizzogiovanna acomparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT broggisara comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT scalcoelisa comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT bellimarialuisa comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT logghegerlinde comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT verellendirk comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT moriconistefano comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT chiaraanna comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT palmisanoanna comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT mellonerenata comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT fiorinoclaudio comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy AT rizzogiovanna comparativeevaluationof3differentfreeformdeformableimageregistrationandcontourpropagationmethodsforheadandneckmrithecaseofparotidchangesduringradiotherapy |