Cargando…
Incidental Dose to Pelvic Nodes in Bladder-Only Radiotherapy: Is It Clinically Relevant?
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although there is a strong biological rationale to electively treat the pelvic nodes during bladder preservation, its clinical benefit is uncertain. This may be explained by the incidental dose received by the nodal regions when treating the bladder alone. This study was cond...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5616055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28168933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617691409 |
_version_ | 1783266716887810048 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Shirley Murthy, Vedang Mahantshetty, Umesh Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore |
author_facet | Lewis, Shirley Murthy, Vedang Mahantshetty, Umesh Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore |
author_sort | Lewis, Shirley |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although there is a strong biological rationale to electively treat the pelvic nodes during bladder preservation, its clinical benefit is uncertain. This may be explained by the incidental dose received by the nodal regions when treating the bladder alone. This study was conducted to investigate the doses received by the different pelvic nodal regions when the bladder alone is treated by standard conformal radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The computed tomography data sets of 20 patients with node-negative muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated in a bladder preservation protocol were studied. Patients were originally treated with conformal radiotherapy to the bladder alone. Replanning was done with additional delineation of the pelvic nodal regions namely common iliac (upper and lower), presacral, internal iliac, obturator, and external iliac. Dose volume parameters such as Dmean, Dmax, D100%, D66%, D33%, V40, and V50 to each of the nodal regions were estimated for all patients. RESULTS: The obturator nodes received the highest dose among all nodal regions. The mean dose received by obturator, external iliac, and internal iliac regions was 59, 45, and 36 Gy, respectively. The dose received by these 3 regions in the full bladder state was 63, 52, and 47 Gy, respectively. The dose received by all other pelvic nodal regions was low and not clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: The incidental dose received by obturator and external iliac nodes is clinically significant in bladder-only radiation, possibly enough to influence micrometastatic disease. This may be a reason for the lack of clear benefit seen with nodal irradiation in bladder cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study highlights that the incidental dose received by obturator and external iliac nodes is clinically significant in bladder-only radiation. The obturator nodes received the highest dose among all nodal regions with mean dose of 59 Gy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5616055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56160552017-10-03 Incidental Dose to Pelvic Nodes in Bladder-Only Radiotherapy: Is It Clinically Relevant? Lewis, Shirley Murthy, Vedang Mahantshetty, Umesh Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore Technol Cancer Res Treat Articles BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although there is a strong biological rationale to electively treat the pelvic nodes during bladder preservation, its clinical benefit is uncertain. This may be explained by the incidental dose received by the nodal regions when treating the bladder alone. This study was conducted to investigate the doses received by the different pelvic nodal regions when the bladder alone is treated by standard conformal radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The computed tomography data sets of 20 patients with node-negative muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated in a bladder preservation protocol were studied. Patients were originally treated with conformal radiotherapy to the bladder alone. Replanning was done with additional delineation of the pelvic nodal regions namely common iliac (upper and lower), presacral, internal iliac, obturator, and external iliac. Dose volume parameters such as Dmean, Dmax, D100%, D66%, D33%, V40, and V50 to each of the nodal regions were estimated for all patients. RESULTS: The obturator nodes received the highest dose among all nodal regions. The mean dose received by obturator, external iliac, and internal iliac regions was 59, 45, and 36 Gy, respectively. The dose received by these 3 regions in the full bladder state was 63, 52, and 47 Gy, respectively. The dose received by all other pelvic nodal regions was low and not clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: The incidental dose received by obturator and external iliac nodes is clinically significant in bladder-only radiation, possibly enough to influence micrometastatic disease. This may be a reason for the lack of clear benefit seen with nodal irradiation in bladder cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study highlights that the incidental dose received by obturator and external iliac nodes is clinically significant in bladder-only radiation. The obturator nodes received the highest dose among all nodal regions with mean dose of 59 Gy. SAGE Publications 2017-02-07 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5616055/ /pubmed/28168933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617691409 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Lewis, Shirley Murthy, Vedang Mahantshetty, Umesh Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore Incidental Dose to Pelvic Nodes in Bladder-Only Radiotherapy: Is It Clinically Relevant? |
title | Incidental Dose to Pelvic Nodes in Bladder-Only Radiotherapy: Is It Clinically Relevant? |
title_full | Incidental Dose to Pelvic Nodes in Bladder-Only Radiotherapy: Is It Clinically Relevant? |
title_fullStr | Incidental Dose to Pelvic Nodes in Bladder-Only Radiotherapy: Is It Clinically Relevant? |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidental Dose to Pelvic Nodes in Bladder-Only Radiotherapy: Is It Clinically Relevant? |
title_short | Incidental Dose to Pelvic Nodes in Bladder-Only Radiotherapy: Is It Clinically Relevant? |
title_sort | incidental dose to pelvic nodes in bladder-only radiotherapy: is it clinically relevant? |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5616055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28168933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617691409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewisshirley incidentaldosetopelvicnodesinbladderonlyradiotherapyisitclinicallyrelevant AT murthyvedang incidentaldosetopelvicnodesinbladderonlyradiotherapyisitclinicallyrelevant AT mahantshettyumesh incidentaldosetopelvicnodesinbladderonlyradiotherapyisitclinicallyrelevant AT shrivastavashyamkishore incidentaldosetopelvicnodesinbladderonlyradiotherapyisitclinicallyrelevant |