Cargando…

Arthroscopic Stabilization After a First-Time Dislocation: Collision Versus Contact Athletes

BACKGROUND: There is no universally accepted definition of “contact” or “collision” sports in the literature. The few available studies evaluating contact and collision sports consider them to be synonymous. However, athletes in collision sports purposely hit or collide with each other or with inani...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranalletta, Maximiliano, Rossi, Luciano A., Alonso Hidalgo, Ignacio, Sirio, Adrian, Puig Dubois, Julieta, Maignon, Gastón D., Bongiovanni, Santiago L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
10
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117729321
_version_ 1783266939389345792
author Ranalletta, Maximiliano
Rossi, Luciano A.
Alonso Hidalgo, Ignacio
Sirio, Adrian
Puig Dubois, Julieta
Maignon, Gastón D.
Bongiovanni, Santiago L.
author_facet Ranalletta, Maximiliano
Rossi, Luciano A.
Alonso Hidalgo, Ignacio
Sirio, Adrian
Puig Dubois, Julieta
Maignon, Gastón D.
Bongiovanni, Santiago L.
author_sort Ranalletta, Maximiliano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no universally accepted definition of “contact” or “collision” sports in the literature. The few available studies evaluating contact and collision sports consider them to be synonymous. However, athletes in collision sports purposely hit or collide with each other or with inanimate objects with greater force and frequency than in contact sports, which could jeopardize functional outcomes. PURPOSE: To compare the functional outcomes, return to sports, and recurrences in a series of contact and collision athletes with a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation treated using arthroscopic stabilization with suture anchors. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 56 athletes were enrolled in this study, including 22 contact athletes and 34 collision athletes. All athletes underwent arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors. Range of motion, the Rowe score, a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Return to sports and recurrences were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of surgery was 22.2 years, and the mean follow-up was 62.4 months (range, 36-94 months). No significant difference in shoulder motion was found between preoperative and postoperative results or between the contact and collision groups. The Rowe, VAS, and ASOSS scores showed statistical improvement in both groups after surgery (P = .001). Patients in the contact group returned to sports significantly faster than those in the collision group (5.2 vs 6.9 months, respectively; P = .01). In all, 43 athletes (76.8%) returned to near-preinjury sports activity levels (≥90% recovery) after surgery: 86.4% of patients in the contact group and 70.6% in the collision group (P = .04). The total recurrence rate was 8.9%. There were 5 recurrences (14.7%) in the collision group and no recurrences in the contact group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic stabilization for anterior instability of the shoulder is a reliable procedure with respect to shoulder function, range of motion, and postoperative return to sports in contact and collision athletes. Compared with the contact group (0%), the collision group yielded a higher failure rate (14.7%). Moreover, patients in the contact group returned significantly faster (5.2 vs 6.9 months, respectively) and to and more returned to preinjury or near-preinjury activity levels (86.4% vs 70.6% of patients, respectively) than patients in the collision group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5617099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56170992017-10-04 Arthroscopic Stabilization After a First-Time Dislocation: Collision Versus Contact Athletes Ranalletta, Maximiliano Rossi, Luciano A. Alonso Hidalgo, Ignacio Sirio, Adrian Puig Dubois, Julieta Maignon, Gastón D. Bongiovanni, Santiago L. Orthop J Sports Med 10 BACKGROUND: There is no universally accepted definition of “contact” or “collision” sports in the literature. The few available studies evaluating contact and collision sports consider them to be synonymous. However, athletes in collision sports purposely hit or collide with each other or with inanimate objects with greater force and frequency than in contact sports, which could jeopardize functional outcomes. PURPOSE: To compare the functional outcomes, return to sports, and recurrences in a series of contact and collision athletes with a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation treated using arthroscopic stabilization with suture anchors. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 56 athletes were enrolled in this study, including 22 contact athletes and 34 collision athletes. All athletes underwent arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors. Range of motion, the Rowe score, a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Return to sports and recurrences were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of surgery was 22.2 years, and the mean follow-up was 62.4 months (range, 36-94 months). No significant difference in shoulder motion was found between preoperative and postoperative results or between the contact and collision groups. The Rowe, VAS, and ASOSS scores showed statistical improvement in both groups after surgery (P = .001). Patients in the contact group returned to sports significantly faster than those in the collision group (5.2 vs 6.9 months, respectively; P = .01). In all, 43 athletes (76.8%) returned to near-preinjury sports activity levels (≥90% recovery) after surgery: 86.4% of patients in the contact group and 70.6% in the collision group (P = .04). The total recurrence rate was 8.9%. There were 5 recurrences (14.7%) in the collision group and no recurrences in the contact group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic stabilization for anterior instability of the shoulder is a reliable procedure with respect to shoulder function, range of motion, and postoperative return to sports in contact and collision athletes. Compared with the contact group (0%), the collision group yielded a higher failure rate (14.7%). Moreover, patients in the contact group returned significantly faster (5.2 vs 6.9 months, respectively) and to and more returned to preinjury or near-preinjury activity levels (86.4% vs 70.6% of patients, respectively) than patients in the collision group. SAGE Publications 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5617099/ /pubmed/28979919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117729321 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 10
Ranalletta, Maximiliano
Rossi, Luciano A.
Alonso Hidalgo, Ignacio
Sirio, Adrian
Puig Dubois, Julieta
Maignon, Gastón D.
Bongiovanni, Santiago L.
Arthroscopic Stabilization After a First-Time Dislocation: Collision Versus Contact Athletes
title Arthroscopic Stabilization After a First-Time Dislocation: Collision Versus Contact Athletes
title_full Arthroscopic Stabilization After a First-Time Dislocation: Collision Versus Contact Athletes
title_fullStr Arthroscopic Stabilization After a First-Time Dislocation: Collision Versus Contact Athletes
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic Stabilization After a First-Time Dislocation: Collision Versus Contact Athletes
title_short Arthroscopic Stabilization After a First-Time Dislocation: Collision Versus Contact Athletes
title_sort arthroscopic stabilization after a first-time dislocation: collision versus contact athletes
topic 10
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28979919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117729321
work_keys_str_mv AT ranallettamaximiliano arthroscopicstabilizationafterafirsttimedislocationcollisionversuscontactathletes
AT rossilucianoa arthroscopicstabilizationafterafirsttimedislocationcollisionversuscontactathletes
AT alonsohidalgoignacio arthroscopicstabilizationafterafirsttimedislocationcollisionversuscontactathletes
AT sirioadrian arthroscopicstabilizationafterafirsttimedislocationcollisionversuscontactathletes
AT puigduboisjulieta arthroscopicstabilizationafterafirsttimedislocationcollisionversuscontactathletes
AT maignongastond arthroscopicstabilizationafterafirsttimedislocationcollisionversuscontactathletes
AT bongiovannisantiagol arthroscopicstabilizationafterafirsttimedislocationcollisionversuscontactathletes