Cargando…

Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence is increasing that single-port or single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative for cholecystectomy in children. In this study, we sought to compare the single-port hybrid technique, which we originally reported in 2012, with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seifarth, Federico G., Liu, Michael H., Ayala, Dimaris, Worley, Sarah, Moslim, Maitham A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026282
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00031
_version_ 1783267016239480832
author Seifarth, Federico G.
Liu, Michael H.
Ayala, Dimaris
Worley, Sarah
Moslim, Maitham A.
author_facet Seifarth, Federico G.
Liu, Michael H.
Ayala, Dimaris
Worley, Sarah
Moslim, Maitham A.
author_sort Seifarth, Federico G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence is increasing that single-port or single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative for cholecystectomy in children. In this study, we sought to compare the single-port hybrid technique, which we originally reported in 2012, with the conventional 4-port approach, in regards of complications, outcome, operative time and cost. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center comparison of hybrid single-port versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 98 consecutive pediatric patients between January 2010 and October 2014. Patient characteristics, intra- and postoperative outcomes, operative costs, and total hospitalization costs were compared between the 2 approaches using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The single-port technique was utilized in 56 (57%) pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The operative time for single-port procedures was shorter than that of the conventional technique (median, 85 minutes vs 114 minutes; P = .003). Patients with single-port procedures were less likely to have a cholangiogram compared to patients who underwent 4-port cholecystectomy. (9% vs 40%; P < .001). No statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts were observed for intra- or postoperative outcomes. Although the 2 groups shared nearly the same median duration of hospitalization (22 hours vs 21 hours; P = .70), the single-port group demonstrated a lower total cost of hospitalization (median cost, $7438 vs $8783; P = .030) and lower operative cost (median, $3918 vs $4647; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Hybrid single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children with uncomplicated gallbladder disease is feasible and equally safe, with similar intra- and postoperative outcomes compared with the conventional 4-port approach. It can contribute to global cost reduction because of lower operative and total hospitalization costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5617561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56175612017-10-12 Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children Seifarth, Federico G. Liu, Michael H. Ayala, Dimaris Worley, Sarah Moslim, Maitham A. JSLS Scientific Paper BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence is increasing that single-port or single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative for cholecystectomy in children. In this study, we sought to compare the single-port hybrid technique, which we originally reported in 2012, with the conventional 4-port approach, in regards of complications, outcome, operative time and cost. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center comparison of hybrid single-port versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 98 consecutive pediatric patients between January 2010 and October 2014. Patient characteristics, intra- and postoperative outcomes, operative costs, and total hospitalization costs were compared between the 2 approaches using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The single-port technique was utilized in 56 (57%) pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The operative time for single-port procedures was shorter than that of the conventional technique (median, 85 minutes vs 114 minutes; P = .003). Patients with single-port procedures were less likely to have a cholangiogram compared to patients who underwent 4-port cholecystectomy. (9% vs 40%; P < .001). No statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts were observed for intra- or postoperative outcomes. Although the 2 groups shared nearly the same median duration of hospitalization (22 hours vs 21 hours; P = .70), the single-port group demonstrated a lower total cost of hospitalization (median cost, $7438 vs $8783; P = .030) and lower operative cost (median, $3918 vs $4647; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Hybrid single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children with uncomplicated gallbladder disease is feasible and equally safe, with similar intra- and postoperative outcomes compared with the conventional 4-port approach. It can contribute to global cost reduction because of lower operative and total hospitalization costs. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5617561/ /pubmed/29026282 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00031 Text en © 2017 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Paper
Seifarth, Federico G.
Liu, Michael H.
Ayala, Dimaris
Worley, Sarah
Moslim, Maitham A.
Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children
title Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children
title_full Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children
title_fullStr Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children
title_full_unstemmed Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children
title_short Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children
title_sort hybrid single-port cholecystectomy vs four-port cholecystectomy in children
topic Scientific Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026282
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00031
work_keys_str_mv AT seifarthfedericog hybridsingleportcholecystectomyvsfourportcholecystectomyinchildren
AT liumichaelh hybridsingleportcholecystectomyvsfourportcholecystectomyinchildren
AT ayaladimaris hybridsingleportcholecystectomyvsfourportcholecystectomyinchildren
AT worleysarah hybridsingleportcholecystectomyvsfourportcholecystectomyinchildren
AT moslimmaithama hybridsingleportcholecystectomyvsfourportcholecystectomyinchildren