Cargando…
Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence is increasing that single-port or single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative for cholecystectomy in children. In this study, we sought to compare the single-port hybrid technique, which we originally reported in 2012, with the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026282 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00031 |
_version_ | 1783267016239480832 |
---|---|
author | Seifarth, Federico G. Liu, Michael H. Ayala, Dimaris Worley, Sarah Moslim, Maitham A. |
author_facet | Seifarth, Federico G. Liu, Michael H. Ayala, Dimaris Worley, Sarah Moslim, Maitham A. |
author_sort | Seifarth, Federico G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence is increasing that single-port or single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative for cholecystectomy in children. In this study, we sought to compare the single-port hybrid technique, which we originally reported in 2012, with the conventional 4-port approach, in regards of complications, outcome, operative time and cost. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center comparison of hybrid single-port versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 98 consecutive pediatric patients between January 2010 and October 2014. Patient characteristics, intra- and postoperative outcomes, operative costs, and total hospitalization costs were compared between the 2 approaches using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The single-port technique was utilized in 56 (57%) pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The operative time for single-port procedures was shorter than that of the conventional technique (median, 85 minutes vs 114 minutes; P = .003). Patients with single-port procedures were less likely to have a cholangiogram compared to patients who underwent 4-port cholecystectomy. (9% vs 40%; P < .001). No statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts were observed for intra- or postoperative outcomes. Although the 2 groups shared nearly the same median duration of hospitalization (22 hours vs 21 hours; P = .70), the single-port group demonstrated a lower total cost of hospitalization (median cost, $7438 vs $8783; P = .030) and lower operative cost (median, $3918 vs $4647; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Hybrid single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children with uncomplicated gallbladder disease is feasible and equally safe, with similar intra- and postoperative outcomes compared with the conventional 4-port approach. It can contribute to global cost reduction because of lower operative and total hospitalization costs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5617561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56175612017-10-12 Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children Seifarth, Federico G. Liu, Michael H. Ayala, Dimaris Worley, Sarah Moslim, Maitham A. JSLS Scientific Paper BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence is increasing that single-port or single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative for cholecystectomy in children. In this study, we sought to compare the single-port hybrid technique, which we originally reported in 2012, with the conventional 4-port approach, in regards of complications, outcome, operative time and cost. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center comparison of hybrid single-port versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 98 consecutive pediatric patients between January 2010 and October 2014. Patient characteristics, intra- and postoperative outcomes, operative costs, and total hospitalization costs were compared between the 2 approaches using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The single-port technique was utilized in 56 (57%) pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The operative time for single-port procedures was shorter than that of the conventional technique (median, 85 minutes vs 114 minutes; P = .003). Patients with single-port procedures were less likely to have a cholangiogram compared to patients who underwent 4-port cholecystectomy. (9% vs 40%; P < .001). No statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts were observed for intra- or postoperative outcomes. Although the 2 groups shared nearly the same median duration of hospitalization (22 hours vs 21 hours; P = .70), the single-port group demonstrated a lower total cost of hospitalization (median cost, $7438 vs $8783; P = .030) and lower operative cost (median, $3918 vs $4647; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Hybrid single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children with uncomplicated gallbladder disease is feasible and equally safe, with similar intra- and postoperative outcomes compared with the conventional 4-port approach. It can contribute to global cost reduction because of lower operative and total hospitalization costs. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5617561/ /pubmed/29026282 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00031 Text en © 2017 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Paper Seifarth, Federico G. Liu, Michael H. Ayala, Dimaris Worley, Sarah Moslim, Maitham A. Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children |
title | Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children |
title_full | Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children |
title_fullStr | Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children |
title_full_unstemmed | Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children |
title_short | Hybrid Single-Port Cholecystectomy Vs Four-Port Cholecystectomy in Children |
title_sort | hybrid single-port cholecystectomy vs four-port cholecystectomy in children |
topic | Scientific Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026282 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seifarthfedericog hybridsingleportcholecystectomyvsfourportcholecystectomyinchildren AT liumichaelh hybridsingleportcholecystectomyvsfourportcholecystectomyinchildren AT ayaladimaris hybridsingleportcholecystectomyvsfourportcholecystectomyinchildren AT worleysarah hybridsingleportcholecystectomyvsfourportcholecystectomyinchildren AT moslimmaithama hybridsingleportcholecystectomyvsfourportcholecystectomyinchildren |