Cargando…

Mid-Term Outcomes of Metal-Backed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Show Superiority to All-Polyethylene Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Two commonly used tibial designs for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are all-polyethylene “inlay” and metal-backed “onlay” components. Biomechanical studies showed that the metal baseplate in onlay designs better distributes forces over the tibia but studies failed to show diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der List, Jelle P., Kleeblad, Laura J., Zuiderbaan, Hendrik A., Pearle, Andrew D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9557-5
_version_ 1783267048276623360
author van der List, Jelle P.
Kleeblad, Laura J.
Zuiderbaan, Hendrik A.
Pearle, Andrew D.
author_facet van der List, Jelle P.
Kleeblad, Laura J.
Zuiderbaan, Hendrik A.
Pearle, Andrew D.
author_sort van der List, Jelle P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two commonly used tibial designs for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are all-polyethylene “inlay” and metal-backed “onlay” components. Biomechanical studies showed that the metal baseplate in onlay designs better distributes forces over the tibia but studies failed to show differences in functional outcomes between both designs at mid-term follow-up. Furthermore, no studies have compared both designs with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The goal of this study was to compare outcomes of inlay UKA and onlay UKA at mid-term follow-up and compare these with TKA outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 52 patients undergoing inlay medial UKA, 59 patients undergoing onlay medial UKA, and 59 patients undergoing TKA were included. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores were collected preoperatively and at mean 5.1-year follow-up (range 4.0–7.0 years). RESULTS: Preoperatively, no differences were observed in patient characteristics or outcome scores. At mid-term follow-up, patients undergoing onlay medial UKA reported significant better functional outcomes than those of inlay medial UKA (92.0 ± 10.4 vs. 82.4 ± 18.7, p = 0.010) and when compared to TKA (92.0 ± 10.4 vs. 79.6 ± 18.5, p < 0.001) while no significant differences between inlay medial UKA and TKA were noted. No significant differences in revision rates were found. CONCLUSION: Functional outcomes following onlay metal-backed medial UKA were significantly better compared to inlay all-polyethylene medial UKA and to TKA. Based on the results of this study and on biomechanical and survivorship studies in the literature, we recommended using metal-backed onlay tibial components for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-017-9557-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5617820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56178202017-10-05 Mid-Term Outcomes of Metal-Backed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Show Superiority to All-Polyethylene Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty van der List, Jelle P. Kleeblad, Laura J. Zuiderbaan, Hendrik A. Pearle, Andrew D. HSS J Original Article BACKGROUND: Two commonly used tibial designs for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are all-polyethylene “inlay” and metal-backed “onlay” components. Biomechanical studies showed that the metal baseplate in onlay designs better distributes forces over the tibia but studies failed to show differences in functional outcomes between both designs at mid-term follow-up. Furthermore, no studies have compared both designs with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The goal of this study was to compare outcomes of inlay UKA and onlay UKA at mid-term follow-up and compare these with TKA outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 52 patients undergoing inlay medial UKA, 59 patients undergoing onlay medial UKA, and 59 patients undergoing TKA were included. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores were collected preoperatively and at mean 5.1-year follow-up (range 4.0–7.0 years). RESULTS: Preoperatively, no differences were observed in patient characteristics or outcome scores. At mid-term follow-up, patients undergoing onlay medial UKA reported significant better functional outcomes than those of inlay medial UKA (92.0 ± 10.4 vs. 82.4 ± 18.7, p = 0.010) and when compared to TKA (92.0 ± 10.4 vs. 79.6 ± 18.5, p < 0.001) while no significant differences between inlay medial UKA and TKA were noted. No significant differences in revision rates were found. CONCLUSION: Functional outcomes following onlay metal-backed medial UKA were significantly better compared to inlay all-polyethylene medial UKA and to TKA. Based on the results of this study and on biomechanical and survivorship studies in the literature, we recommended using metal-backed onlay tibial components for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-017-9557-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-05-12 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5617820/ /pubmed/28983215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9557-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
van der List, Jelle P.
Kleeblad, Laura J.
Zuiderbaan, Hendrik A.
Pearle, Andrew D.
Mid-Term Outcomes of Metal-Backed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Show Superiority to All-Polyethylene Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty
title Mid-Term Outcomes of Metal-Backed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Show Superiority to All-Polyethylene Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Mid-Term Outcomes of Metal-Backed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Show Superiority to All-Polyethylene Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Mid-Term Outcomes of Metal-Backed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Show Superiority to All-Polyethylene Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Mid-Term Outcomes of Metal-Backed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Show Superiority to All-Polyethylene Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Mid-Term Outcomes of Metal-Backed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Show Superiority to All-Polyethylene Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort mid-term outcomes of metal-backed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty show superiority to all-polyethylene unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9557-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderlistjellep midtermoutcomesofmetalbackedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyshowsuperioritytoallpolyethyleneunicompartmentalandtotalkneearthroplasty
AT kleebladlauraj midtermoutcomesofmetalbackedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyshowsuperioritytoallpolyethyleneunicompartmentalandtotalkneearthroplasty
AT zuiderbaanhendrika midtermoutcomesofmetalbackedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyshowsuperioritytoallpolyethyleneunicompartmentalandtotalkneearthroplasty
AT pearleandrewd midtermoutcomesofmetalbackedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyshowsuperioritytoallpolyethyleneunicompartmentalandtotalkneearthroplasty