Cargando…

Similar Cost Savings of Bundled Payment Initiatives Applied to Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Be Achieved Applying Both Models 2 and 3

BACKGROUND: In an effort to control cost and increase value, Medicare is transitioning from fee-for-service to value-based alternative payment models (APMs). The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative represents one such voluntary APM. BPCI offers four different bundling options: mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alfonso, Allyson, Hutzler, Lorraine, Robb, Bill, Beste, Chad, Blom, André, Bosco, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9571-7
_version_ 1783267048746385408
author Alfonso, Allyson
Hutzler, Lorraine
Robb, Bill
Beste, Chad
Blom, André
Bosco, Joseph
author_facet Alfonso, Allyson
Hutzler, Lorraine
Robb, Bill
Beste, Chad
Blom, André
Bosco, Joseph
author_sort Alfonso, Allyson
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In an effort to control cost and increase value, Medicare is transitioning from fee-for-service to value-based alternative payment models (APMs). The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative represents one such voluntary APM. BPCI offers four different bundling options: model 1 covers all Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) and Models 2–4 cover 48 clinical episodes, including 186 separate DRGs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this investigation is to analyze and compare the cost savings achieved by two different BPCI program participants, provider A and provider B, enrolled in different models of BPCI (Models 2 and 3) for lower extremity joint replacements (LEJRs). METHODS: We analyzed the BPCI cost savings for Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) 469 and 470 (lower extremity joint replacement) of two different BPCI program participants. One (provider A) participated in Model 2 while the other (provider B) participated in Model 3. Retrospective payments were based upon savings generated by decreased actual expenses reconciled against target pricing for the episode of care in Models 2 and 3. RESULTS: The Model 2 participant reduced the average cost of all episodes by 18.45%, with all of the savings occurring in the post acute phase. The Model 3 participant reduced episode costs by 16.73%. CONCLUSION: Both BPCI providers achieved similar cost savings despite participating in different BPCI models. These cost savings all occurred in the post acute setting. The Model 2 provider achieved post acute savings through decreasing overall discharges to institutional post acute care (PAC) providers and decreasing readmissions, while the Model 3 provider decreased costs largely by decreasing the LOS for the institutional PAC providers and decreasing readmissions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-017-9571-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5617826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56178262017-10-05 Similar Cost Savings of Bundled Payment Initiatives Applied to Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Be Achieved Applying Both Models 2 and 3 Alfonso, Allyson Hutzler, Lorraine Robb, Bill Beste, Chad Blom, André Bosco, Joseph HSS J Original Article BACKGROUND: In an effort to control cost and increase value, Medicare is transitioning from fee-for-service to value-based alternative payment models (APMs). The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative represents one such voluntary APM. BPCI offers four different bundling options: model 1 covers all Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) and Models 2–4 cover 48 clinical episodes, including 186 separate DRGs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this investigation is to analyze and compare the cost savings achieved by two different BPCI program participants, provider A and provider B, enrolled in different models of BPCI (Models 2 and 3) for lower extremity joint replacements (LEJRs). METHODS: We analyzed the BPCI cost savings for Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) 469 and 470 (lower extremity joint replacement) of two different BPCI program participants. One (provider A) participated in Model 2 while the other (provider B) participated in Model 3. Retrospective payments were based upon savings generated by decreased actual expenses reconciled against target pricing for the episode of care in Models 2 and 3. RESULTS: The Model 2 participant reduced the average cost of all episodes by 18.45%, with all of the savings occurring in the post acute phase. The Model 3 participant reduced episode costs by 16.73%. CONCLUSION: Both BPCI providers achieved similar cost savings despite participating in different BPCI models. These cost savings all occurred in the post acute setting. The Model 2 provider achieved post acute savings through decreasing overall discharges to institutional post acute care (PAC) providers and decreasing readmissions, while the Model 3 provider decreased costs largely by decreasing the LOS for the institutional PAC providers and decreasing readmissions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11420-017-9571-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-08-18 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5617826/ /pubmed/28983220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9571-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alfonso, Allyson
Hutzler, Lorraine
Robb, Bill
Beste, Chad
Blom, André
Bosco, Joseph
Similar Cost Savings of Bundled Payment Initiatives Applied to Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Be Achieved Applying Both Models 2 and 3
title Similar Cost Savings of Bundled Payment Initiatives Applied to Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Be Achieved Applying Both Models 2 and 3
title_full Similar Cost Savings of Bundled Payment Initiatives Applied to Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Be Achieved Applying Both Models 2 and 3
title_fullStr Similar Cost Savings of Bundled Payment Initiatives Applied to Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Be Achieved Applying Both Models 2 and 3
title_full_unstemmed Similar Cost Savings of Bundled Payment Initiatives Applied to Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Be Achieved Applying Both Models 2 and 3
title_short Similar Cost Savings of Bundled Payment Initiatives Applied to Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Can Be Achieved Applying Both Models 2 and 3
title_sort similar cost savings of bundled payment initiatives applied to lower extremity total joint arthroplasty can be achieved applying both models 2 and 3
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9571-7
work_keys_str_mv AT alfonsoallyson similarcostsavingsofbundledpaymentinitiativesappliedtolowerextremitytotaljointarthroplastycanbeachievedapplyingbothmodels2and3
AT hutzlerlorraine similarcostsavingsofbundledpaymentinitiativesappliedtolowerextremitytotaljointarthroplastycanbeachievedapplyingbothmodels2and3
AT robbbill similarcostsavingsofbundledpaymentinitiativesappliedtolowerextremitytotaljointarthroplastycanbeachievedapplyingbothmodels2and3
AT bestechad similarcostsavingsofbundledpaymentinitiativesappliedtolowerextremitytotaljointarthroplastycanbeachievedapplyingbothmodels2and3
AT blomandre similarcostsavingsofbundledpaymentinitiativesappliedtolowerextremitytotaljointarthroplastycanbeachievedapplyingbothmodels2and3
AT boscojoseph similarcostsavingsofbundledpaymentinitiativesappliedtolowerextremitytotaljointarthroplastycanbeachievedapplyingbothmodels2and3