Cargando…
Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears?
Pigeon et al. (2016) Staying cool in a changing landscape: the influence of maximum daily ambient temperature on grizzly bear habitat selection. Oecologia 181:1101. doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3630-5 analyzed the effect of ambient temperature on the habitat selection of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Al...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28887693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3948-7 |
_version_ | 1783267058186715136 |
---|---|
author | Ordiz, Andrés Støen, Ole-Gunnar Delibes, Miguel Swenson, Jon E. |
author_facet | Ordiz, Andrés Støen, Ole-Gunnar Delibes, Miguel Swenson, Jon E. |
author_sort | Ordiz, Andrés |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pigeon et al. (2016) Staying cool in a changing landscape: the influence of maximum daily ambient temperature on grizzly bear habitat selection. Oecologia 181:1101. doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3630-5 analyzed the effect of ambient temperature on the habitat selection of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Alberta, Canada. They concluded that temperature played a significant role in bear habitat selection and that it was unlikely that human activity introduced biases to the habitat selection of bears. However, Pigeon et al. did not consider variables related to human activities in their analyses. They also misinterpreted previous research that has accounted for temperature in the habitat selection of brown bears. There is much literature published on the negative effects of human disturbance on wildlife in general and on bears in particular. Downplaying the role of human disturbance could have important negative consequences if, in fact, human disturbance were a more important factor than thermoregulation. Indeed, dismissing the importance of human influence, in the face of contradictory evidence, could tempt managers to disregard an important factor that is difficult and often unpopular to deal with in their conservation plans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5617871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56178712017-10-12 Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears? Ordiz, Andrés Støen, Ole-Gunnar Delibes, Miguel Swenson, Jon E. Oecologia Views and Comments Pigeon et al. (2016) Staying cool in a changing landscape: the influence of maximum daily ambient temperature on grizzly bear habitat selection. Oecologia 181:1101. doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3630-5 analyzed the effect of ambient temperature on the habitat selection of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Alberta, Canada. They concluded that temperature played a significant role in bear habitat selection and that it was unlikely that human activity introduced biases to the habitat selection of bears. However, Pigeon et al. did not consider variables related to human activities in their analyses. They also misinterpreted previous research that has accounted for temperature in the habitat selection of brown bears. There is much literature published on the negative effects of human disturbance on wildlife in general and on bears in particular. Downplaying the role of human disturbance could have important negative consequences if, in fact, human disturbance were a more important factor than thermoregulation. Indeed, dismissing the importance of human influence, in the face of contradictory evidence, could tempt managers to disregard an important factor that is difficult and often unpopular to deal with in their conservation plans. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-08 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5617871/ /pubmed/28887693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3948-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Views and Comments Ordiz, Andrés Støen, Ole-Gunnar Delibes, Miguel Swenson, Jon E. Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears? |
title | Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears? |
title_full | Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears? |
title_fullStr | Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears? |
title_full_unstemmed | Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears? |
title_short | Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears? |
title_sort | staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears? |
topic | Views and Comments |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28887693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3948-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ordizandres stayingcoolorstayingsafeinahumandominatedlandscapewhichismorerelevantforbrownbears AT støenolegunnar stayingcoolorstayingsafeinahumandominatedlandscapewhichismorerelevantforbrownbears AT delibesmiguel stayingcoolorstayingsafeinahumandominatedlandscapewhichismorerelevantforbrownbears AT swensonjone stayingcoolorstayingsafeinahumandominatedlandscapewhichismorerelevantforbrownbears |