Cargando…

Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears?

Pigeon et al. (2016) Staying cool in a changing landscape: the influence of maximum daily ambient temperature on grizzly bear habitat selection. Oecologia 181:1101. doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3630-5 analyzed the effect of ambient temperature on the habitat selection of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ordiz, Andrés, Støen, Ole-Gunnar, Delibes, Miguel, Swenson, Jon E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28887693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3948-7
_version_ 1783267058186715136
author Ordiz, Andrés
Støen, Ole-Gunnar
Delibes, Miguel
Swenson, Jon E.
author_facet Ordiz, Andrés
Støen, Ole-Gunnar
Delibes, Miguel
Swenson, Jon E.
author_sort Ordiz, Andrés
collection PubMed
description Pigeon et al. (2016) Staying cool in a changing landscape: the influence of maximum daily ambient temperature on grizzly bear habitat selection. Oecologia 181:1101. doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3630-5 analyzed the effect of ambient temperature on the habitat selection of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Alberta, Canada. They concluded that temperature played a significant role in bear habitat selection and that it was unlikely that human activity introduced biases to the habitat selection of bears. However, Pigeon et al. did not consider variables related to human activities in their analyses. They also misinterpreted previous research that has accounted for temperature in the habitat selection of brown bears. There is much literature published on the negative effects of human disturbance on wildlife in general and on bears in particular. Downplaying the role of human disturbance could have important negative consequences if, in fact, human disturbance were a more important factor than thermoregulation. Indeed, dismissing the importance of human influence, in the face of contradictory evidence, could tempt managers to disregard an important factor that is difficult and often unpopular to deal with in their conservation plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5617871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56178712017-10-12 Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears? Ordiz, Andrés Støen, Ole-Gunnar Delibes, Miguel Swenson, Jon E. Oecologia Views and Comments Pigeon et al. (2016) Staying cool in a changing landscape: the influence of maximum daily ambient temperature on grizzly bear habitat selection. Oecologia 181:1101. doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3630-5 analyzed the effect of ambient temperature on the habitat selection of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in Alberta, Canada. They concluded that temperature played a significant role in bear habitat selection and that it was unlikely that human activity introduced biases to the habitat selection of bears. However, Pigeon et al. did not consider variables related to human activities in their analyses. They also misinterpreted previous research that has accounted for temperature in the habitat selection of brown bears. There is much literature published on the negative effects of human disturbance on wildlife in general and on bears in particular. Downplaying the role of human disturbance could have important negative consequences if, in fact, human disturbance were a more important factor than thermoregulation. Indeed, dismissing the importance of human influence, in the face of contradictory evidence, could tempt managers to disregard an important factor that is difficult and often unpopular to deal with in their conservation plans. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-08 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5617871/ /pubmed/28887693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3948-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Views and Comments
Ordiz, Andrés
Støen, Ole-Gunnar
Delibes, Miguel
Swenson, Jon E.
Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears?
title Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears?
title_full Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears?
title_fullStr Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears?
title_full_unstemmed Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears?
title_short Staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears?
title_sort staying cool or staying safe in a human-dominated landscape: which is more relevant for brown bears?
topic Views and Comments
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28887693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3948-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ordizandres stayingcoolorstayingsafeinahumandominatedlandscapewhichismorerelevantforbrownbears
AT støenolegunnar stayingcoolorstayingsafeinahumandominatedlandscapewhichismorerelevantforbrownbears
AT delibesmiguel stayingcoolorstayingsafeinahumandominatedlandscapewhichismorerelevantforbrownbears
AT swensonjone stayingcoolorstayingsafeinahumandominatedlandscapewhichismorerelevantforbrownbears