Cargando…

Nanofiltration and Tight Ultrafiltration Membranes for Natural Organic Matter Removal—Contribution of Fouling and Concentration Polarization to Filtration Resistance

Nanofiltration (NF) and tight ultrafiltration (tight UF) membranes are a viable treatment option for high quality drinking water production from sources with high concentrations of contaminants. To date, there is limited knowledge regarding the contribution of concentration polarization (CP) and fou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winter, Joerg, Barbeau, Benoit, Bérubé, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28671604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes7030034
_version_ 1783267115697963008
author Winter, Joerg
Barbeau, Benoit
Bérubé, Pierre
author_facet Winter, Joerg
Barbeau, Benoit
Bérubé, Pierre
author_sort Winter, Joerg
collection PubMed
description Nanofiltration (NF) and tight ultrafiltration (tight UF) membranes are a viable treatment option for high quality drinking water production from sources with high concentrations of contaminants. To date, there is limited knowledge regarding the contribution of concentration polarization (CP) and fouling to the increase in resistance during filtration of natural organic matter (NOM) with NF and tight UF. Filtration tests were conducted with NF and tight UF membranes with molecular weight cut offs (MWCOs) of 300, 2000 and 8000 Da, and model raw waters containing different constituents of NOM. When filtering model raw waters containing high concentrations of polysaccharides (i.e., higher molecular weight NOM), the increase in resistance was dominated by fouling. When filtering model raw waters containing humic substances (i.e., lower molecular weight NOM), the increase in filtration resistance was dominated by CP. The results indicate that low MWCO membranes are better suited for NOM removal, because most of the NOM in surface waters consist mainly of humic substances, which were only effectively rejected by the lower MWCO membranes. However, when humic substances are effectively rejected, CP can become extensive, leading to a significant increase in filtration resistance by the formation of a cake/gel layer at the membrane surface. For this reason, cross-flow operation, which reduces CP, is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5618119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56181192017-09-29 Nanofiltration and Tight Ultrafiltration Membranes for Natural Organic Matter Removal—Contribution of Fouling and Concentration Polarization to Filtration Resistance Winter, Joerg Barbeau, Benoit Bérubé, Pierre Membranes (Basel) Article Nanofiltration (NF) and tight ultrafiltration (tight UF) membranes are a viable treatment option for high quality drinking water production from sources with high concentrations of contaminants. To date, there is limited knowledge regarding the contribution of concentration polarization (CP) and fouling to the increase in resistance during filtration of natural organic matter (NOM) with NF and tight UF. Filtration tests were conducted with NF and tight UF membranes with molecular weight cut offs (MWCOs) of 300, 2000 and 8000 Da, and model raw waters containing different constituents of NOM. When filtering model raw waters containing high concentrations of polysaccharides (i.e., higher molecular weight NOM), the increase in resistance was dominated by fouling. When filtering model raw waters containing humic substances (i.e., lower molecular weight NOM), the increase in filtration resistance was dominated by CP. The results indicate that low MWCO membranes are better suited for NOM removal, because most of the NOM in surface waters consist mainly of humic substances, which were only effectively rejected by the lower MWCO membranes. However, when humic substances are effectively rejected, CP can become extensive, leading to a significant increase in filtration resistance by the formation of a cake/gel layer at the membrane surface. For this reason, cross-flow operation, which reduces CP, is recommended. MDPI 2017-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5618119/ /pubmed/28671604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes7030034 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Winter, Joerg
Barbeau, Benoit
Bérubé, Pierre
Nanofiltration and Tight Ultrafiltration Membranes for Natural Organic Matter Removal—Contribution of Fouling and Concentration Polarization to Filtration Resistance
title Nanofiltration and Tight Ultrafiltration Membranes for Natural Organic Matter Removal—Contribution of Fouling and Concentration Polarization to Filtration Resistance
title_full Nanofiltration and Tight Ultrafiltration Membranes for Natural Organic Matter Removal—Contribution of Fouling and Concentration Polarization to Filtration Resistance
title_fullStr Nanofiltration and Tight Ultrafiltration Membranes for Natural Organic Matter Removal—Contribution of Fouling and Concentration Polarization to Filtration Resistance
title_full_unstemmed Nanofiltration and Tight Ultrafiltration Membranes for Natural Organic Matter Removal—Contribution of Fouling and Concentration Polarization to Filtration Resistance
title_short Nanofiltration and Tight Ultrafiltration Membranes for Natural Organic Matter Removal—Contribution of Fouling and Concentration Polarization to Filtration Resistance
title_sort nanofiltration and tight ultrafiltration membranes for natural organic matter removal—contribution of fouling and concentration polarization to filtration resistance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28671604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes7030034
work_keys_str_mv AT winterjoerg nanofiltrationandtightultrafiltrationmembranesfornaturalorganicmatterremovalcontributionoffoulingandconcentrationpolarizationtofiltrationresistance
AT barbeaubenoit nanofiltrationandtightultrafiltrationmembranesfornaturalorganicmatterremovalcontributionoffoulingandconcentrationpolarizationtofiltrationresistance
AT berubepierre nanofiltrationandtightultrafiltrationmembranesfornaturalorganicmatterremovalcontributionoffoulingandconcentrationpolarizationtofiltrationresistance