Cargando…
Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema
AIM: To study the usefulness of orbital ultrasonography in the diagnosis of papilledema. METHODS: Fifty patients who were referred to the neurophthalmology clinic and clinically suspected to have papilledema were selected. Thorough, clinical examination with slitlamp biomicroscopy and visual acuity...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026691 http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v7.i3.108 |
_version_ | 1783267121605640192 |
---|---|
author | Bhosale, Ananth Shah, Virna M Shah, Parag K |
author_facet | Bhosale, Ananth Shah, Virna M Shah, Parag K |
author_sort | Bhosale, Ananth |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To study the usefulness of orbital ultrasonography in the diagnosis of papilledema. METHODS: Fifty patients who were referred to the neurophthalmology clinic and clinically suspected to have papilledema were selected. Thorough, clinical examination with slitlamp biomicroscopy and visual acuity assessment was done. These patients underwent ultrasonography to demonstrate the crescent sign. The patients were further evaluated with the neurologist and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) thus confirming the diagnosis of papilledema. The results of our ultrasonographic evaluation were correlated with final diagnosis after thorough clinical evaluation, imaging and the neurologist’s opinion. RESULTS: Out of 50 patients diagnosed having papilledema on MRI, 46 (92%) showed crescent sign on B scan ultrasonography. Headache was most common presenting complaint in 47 (94%) and idiopathic intracranial hypertension was most common underlying cause of papilledema in 30 (60%) cases. CONCLUSION: “Crescent sign” seen on ultrasonography is a sensitive tool for diagnosis of papilledema. It is cost effective, less cumbersome and effective tool to differentiate between papilledema and pseudo papilledema before subjecting the patients to costly investigations like MRI. A positive crescent sign should always be followed by MRI to find out the cause of papilledema. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5618144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56181442017-10-12 Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema Bhosale, Ananth Shah, Virna M Shah, Parag K World J Methodol Retrospective Study AIM: To study the usefulness of orbital ultrasonography in the diagnosis of papilledema. METHODS: Fifty patients who were referred to the neurophthalmology clinic and clinically suspected to have papilledema were selected. Thorough, clinical examination with slitlamp biomicroscopy and visual acuity assessment was done. These patients underwent ultrasonography to demonstrate the crescent sign. The patients were further evaluated with the neurologist and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) thus confirming the diagnosis of papilledema. The results of our ultrasonographic evaluation were correlated with final diagnosis after thorough clinical evaluation, imaging and the neurologist’s opinion. RESULTS: Out of 50 patients diagnosed having papilledema on MRI, 46 (92%) showed crescent sign on B scan ultrasonography. Headache was most common presenting complaint in 47 (94%) and idiopathic intracranial hypertension was most common underlying cause of papilledema in 30 (60%) cases. CONCLUSION: “Crescent sign” seen on ultrasonography is a sensitive tool for diagnosis of papilledema. It is cost effective, less cumbersome and effective tool to differentiate between papilledema and pseudo papilledema before subjecting the patients to costly investigations like MRI. A positive crescent sign should always be followed by MRI to find out the cause of papilledema. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5618144/ /pubmed/29026691 http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v7.i3.108 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Bhosale, Ananth Shah, Virna M Shah, Parag K Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema |
title | Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema |
title_full | Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema |
title_short | Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema |
title_sort | accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026691 http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v7.i3.108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhosaleananth accuracyofcrescentsignonocularultrasoundindiagnosingpapilledema AT shahvirnam accuracyofcrescentsignonocularultrasoundindiagnosingpapilledema AT shahparagk accuracyofcrescentsignonocularultrasoundindiagnosingpapilledema |