Cargando…

Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema

AIM: To study the usefulness of orbital ultrasonography in the diagnosis of papilledema. METHODS: Fifty patients who were referred to the neurophthalmology clinic and clinically suspected to have papilledema were selected. Thorough, clinical examination with slitlamp biomicroscopy and visual acuity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhosale, Ananth, Shah, Virna M, Shah, Parag K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026691
http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v7.i3.108
_version_ 1783267121605640192
author Bhosale, Ananth
Shah, Virna M
Shah, Parag K
author_facet Bhosale, Ananth
Shah, Virna M
Shah, Parag K
author_sort Bhosale, Ananth
collection PubMed
description AIM: To study the usefulness of orbital ultrasonography in the diagnosis of papilledema. METHODS: Fifty patients who were referred to the neurophthalmology clinic and clinically suspected to have papilledema were selected. Thorough, clinical examination with slitlamp biomicroscopy and visual acuity assessment was done. These patients underwent ultrasonography to demonstrate the crescent sign. The patients were further evaluated with the neurologist and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) thus confirming the diagnosis of papilledema. The results of our ultrasonographic evaluation were correlated with final diagnosis after thorough clinical evaluation, imaging and the neurologist’s opinion. RESULTS: Out of 50 patients diagnosed having papilledema on MRI, 46 (92%) showed crescent sign on B scan ultrasonography. Headache was most common presenting complaint in 47 (94%) and idiopathic intracranial hypertension was most common underlying cause of papilledema in 30 (60%) cases. CONCLUSION: “Crescent sign” seen on ultrasonography is a sensitive tool for diagnosis of papilledema. It is cost effective, less cumbersome and effective tool to differentiate between papilledema and pseudo papilledema before subjecting the patients to costly investigations like MRI. A positive crescent sign should always be followed by MRI to find out the cause of papilledema.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5618144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56181442017-10-12 Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema Bhosale, Ananth Shah, Virna M Shah, Parag K World J Methodol Retrospective Study AIM: To study the usefulness of orbital ultrasonography in the diagnosis of papilledema. METHODS: Fifty patients who were referred to the neurophthalmology clinic and clinically suspected to have papilledema were selected. Thorough, clinical examination with slitlamp biomicroscopy and visual acuity assessment was done. These patients underwent ultrasonography to demonstrate the crescent sign. The patients were further evaluated with the neurologist and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) thus confirming the diagnosis of papilledema. The results of our ultrasonographic evaluation were correlated with final diagnosis after thorough clinical evaluation, imaging and the neurologist’s opinion. RESULTS: Out of 50 patients diagnosed having papilledema on MRI, 46 (92%) showed crescent sign on B scan ultrasonography. Headache was most common presenting complaint in 47 (94%) and idiopathic intracranial hypertension was most common underlying cause of papilledema in 30 (60%) cases. CONCLUSION: “Crescent sign” seen on ultrasonography is a sensitive tool for diagnosis of papilledema. It is cost effective, less cumbersome and effective tool to differentiate between papilledema and pseudo papilledema before subjecting the patients to costly investigations like MRI. A positive crescent sign should always be followed by MRI to find out the cause of papilledema. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5618144/ /pubmed/29026691 http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v7.i3.108 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Bhosale, Ananth
Shah, Virna M
Shah, Parag K
Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema
title Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema
title_full Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema
title_fullStr Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema
title_short Accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema
title_sort accuracy of crescent sign on ocular ultrasound in diagnosing papilledema
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026691
http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v7.i3.108
work_keys_str_mv AT bhosaleananth accuracyofcrescentsignonocularultrasoundindiagnosingpapilledema
AT shahvirnam accuracyofcrescentsignonocularultrasoundindiagnosingpapilledema
AT shahparagk accuracyofcrescentsignonocularultrasoundindiagnosingpapilledema