Cargando…

Pediatric Respiratory Support Technology and Practices: A Global Survey †

Objective: This global survey aimed to assess the current respiratory support capabilities for children with hypoxemia and respiratory failure in different economic settings. Methods: An online, anonymous survey of medical providers with experience in managing pediatric acute respiratory illness was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Saint André-von Arnim, Amélie O., Jamal, Shelina M., John-Stewart, Grace C., Musa, Ndidiamaka L., Roberts, Joan, Stanberry, Larissa I., Howard, Christopher R. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28754002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare5030034
_version_ 1783267125969813504
author von Saint André-von Arnim, Amélie O.
Jamal, Shelina M.
John-Stewart, Grace C.
Musa, Ndidiamaka L.
Roberts, Joan
Stanberry, Larissa I.
Howard, Christopher R. A.
author_facet von Saint André-von Arnim, Amélie O.
Jamal, Shelina M.
John-Stewart, Grace C.
Musa, Ndidiamaka L.
Roberts, Joan
Stanberry, Larissa I.
Howard, Christopher R. A.
author_sort von Saint André-von Arnim, Amélie O.
collection PubMed
description Objective: This global survey aimed to assess the current respiratory support capabilities for children with hypoxemia and respiratory failure in different economic settings. Methods: An online, anonymous survey of medical providers with experience in managing pediatric acute respiratory illness was distributed electronically to members of the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Society, and other critical care websites for 3 months. Results: The survey was completed by 295 participants from 64 countries, including 28 High-Income (HIC) and 36 Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). Most respondents (≥84%) worked in urban tertiary care centers. For managing acute respiratory failure, endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation was the most commonly reported form of respiratory support (≥94% in LMIC and HIC). Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) was the most commonly reported form of non-invasive positive pressure support (≥86% in LMIC and HIC). Bubble-CPAP was used by 36% HIC and 39% LMIC participants. ECMO for acute respiratory failure was reported by 45% of HIC participants, compared to 34% of LMIC. Oxygen, air, gas humidifiers, breathing circuits, patient interfaces, and oxygen saturation monitoring appear widely available. Reported ICU patient to health care provider ratios were higher in LMIC compared to HIC. The frequency of respiratory assessments was hourly in HIC, compared to every 2–4 h in LMIC. Conclusions: This survey indicates many apparent similarities in the presence of respiratory support systems in urban care centers globally, but system quality, quantity, and functionality were not established by this survey. LMIC ICUs appear to have higher patient to medical staff ratios, with decreased patient monitoring frequencies, suggesting patient safety should be a focus during the introduction of new respiratory support devices and practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5618162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56181622017-09-29 Pediatric Respiratory Support Technology and Practices: A Global Survey † von Saint André-von Arnim, Amélie O. Jamal, Shelina M. John-Stewart, Grace C. Musa, Ndidiamaka L. Roberts, Joan Stanberry, Larissa I. Howard, Christopher R. A. Healthcare (Basel) Article Objective: This global survey aimed to assess the current respiratory support capabilities for children with hypoxemia and respiratory failure in different economic settings. Methods: An online, anonymous survey of medical providers with experience in managing pediatric acute respiratory illness was distributed electronically to members of the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Society, and other critical care websites for 3 months. Results: The survey was completed by 295 participants from 64 countries, including 28 High-Income (HIC) and 36 Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). Most respondents (≥84%) worked in urban tertiary care centers. For managing acute respiratory failure, endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation was the most commonly reported form of respiratory support (≥94% in LMIC and HIC). Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) was the most commonly reported form of non-invasive positive pressure support (≥86% in LMIC and HIC). Bubble-CPAP was used by 36% HIC and 39% LMIC participants. ECMO for acute respiratory failure was reported by 45% of HIC participants, compared to 34% of LMIC. Oxygen, air, gas humidifiers, breathing circuits, patient interfaces, and oxygen saturation monitoring appear widely available. Reported ICU patient to health care provider ratios were higher in LMIC compared to HIC. The frequency of respiratory assessments was hourly in HIC, compared to every 2–4 h in LMIC. Conclusions: This survey indicates many apparent similarities in the presence of respiratory support systems in urban care centers globally, but system quality, quantity, and functionality were not established by this survey. LMIC ICUs appear to have higher patient to medical staff ratios, with decreased patient monitoring frequencies, suggesting patient safety should be a focus during the introduction of new respiratory support devices and practices. MDPI 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5618162/ /pubmed/28754002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare5030034 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
von Saint André-von Arnim, Amélie O.
Jamal, Shelina M.
John-Stewart, Grace C.
Musa, Ndidiamaka L.
Roberts, Joan
Stanberry, Larissa I.
Howard, Christopher R. A.
Pediatric Respiratory Support Technology and Practices: A Global Survey †
title Pediatric Respiratory Support Technology and Practices: A Global Survey †
title_full Pediatric Respiratory Support Technology and Practices: A Global Survey †
title_fullStr Pediatric Respiratory Support Technology and Practices: A Global Survey †
title_full_unstemmed Pediatric Respiratory Support Technology and Practices: A Global Survey †
title_short Pediatric Respiratory Support Technology and Practices: A Global Survey †
title_sort pediatric respiratory support technology and practices: a global survey †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28754002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare5030034
work_keys_str_mv AT vonsaintandrevonarnimamelieo pediatricrespiratorysupporttechnologyandpracticesaglobalsurvey
AT jamalshelinam pediatricrespiratorysupporttechnologyandpracticesaglobalsurvey
AT johnstewartgracec pediatricrespiratorysupporttechnologyandpracticesaglobalsurvey
AT musandidiamakal pediatricrespiratorysupporttechnologyandpracticesaglobalsurvey
AT robertsjoan pediatricrespiratorysupporttechnologyandpracticesaglobalsurvey
AT stanberrylarissai pediatricrespiratorysupporttechnologyandpracticesaglobalsurvey
AT howardchristopherra pediatricrespiratorysupporttechnologyandpracticesaglobalsurvey