Cargando…

α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t

Nine publically available biosafety protocols for safely handling conotoxin peptides were tested to evaluate their decontamination efficacy. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to assess the effect of each chemical treatment on the secondary and primary structur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, Matthew W., Cort, John R., McDougal, Owen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28906461
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090281
_version_ 1783267138397536256
author Turner, Matthew W.
Cort, John R.
McDougal, Owen M.
author_facet Turner, Matthew W.
Cort, John R.
McDougal, Owen M.
author_sort Turner, Matthew W.
collection PubMed
description Nine publically available biosafety protocols for safely handling conotoxin peptides were tested to evaluate their decontamination efficacy. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to assess the effect of each chemical treatment on the secondary and primary structure of α-CTx MII (L10V, E11A). Of the nine decontamination methods tested, treatment with 1% (m/v) solution of the enzymatic detergent Contrex™ EZ resulted in a 76.8% decrease in α-helical content as assessed by the mean residue ellipticity at 222 nm, and partial peptide digestion was demonstrated using high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Additionally, treatment with 6% sodium hypochlorite (m/v) resulted in 80.5% decrease in α-helical content and complete digestion of the peptide. The Contrex™ EZ treatment was repeated with three additional α-conotoxins (α-CTxs), α-CTxs LvIA, ImI and PeIA, which verified the decontamination method was reasonably robust. These results support the use of either 1% Contrex™ EZ solution or 6% sodium hypochlorite in biosafety protocols for the decontamination of α-CTxs in research laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5618214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56182142017-09-29 α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t Turner, Matthew W. Cort, John R. McDougal, Owen M. Toxins (Basel) Article Nine publically available biosafety protocols for safely handling conotoxin peptides were tested to evaluate their decontamination efficacy. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to assess the effect of each chemical treatment on the secondary and primary structure of α-CTx MII (L10V, E11A). Of the nine decontamination methods tested, treatment with 1% (m/v) solution of the enzymatic detergent Contrex™ EZ resulted in a 76.8% decrease in α-helical content as assessed by the mean residue ellipticity at 222 nm, and partial peptide digestion was demonstrated using high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Additionally, treatment with 6% sodium hypochlorite (m/v) resulted in 80.5% decrease in α-helical content and complete digestion of the peptide. The Contrex™ EZ treatment was repeated with three additional α-conotoxins (α-CTxs), α-CTxs LvIA, ImI and PeIA, which verified the decontamination method was reasonably robust. These results support the use of either 1% Contrex™ EZ solution or 6% sodium hypochlorite in biosafety protocols for the decontamination of α-CTxs in research laboratories. MDPI 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5618214/ /pubmed/28906461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090281 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Turner, Matthew W.
Cort, John R.
McDougal, Owen M.
α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t
title α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t
title_full α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t
title_fullStr α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t
title_full_unstemmed α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t
title_short α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t
title_sort α-conotoxin decontamination protocol evaluation: what works and what doesn’t
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28906461
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090281
work_keys_str_mv AT turnermattheww aconotoxindecontaminationprotocolevaluationwhatworksandwhatdoesnt
AT cortjohnr aconotoxindecontaminationprotocolevaluationwhatworksandwhatdoesnt
AT mcdougalowenm aconotoxindecontaminationprotocolevaluationwhatworksandwhatdoesnt