Cargando…
α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t
Nine publically available biosafety protocols for safely handling conotoxin peptides were tested to evaluate their decontamination efficacy. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to assess the effect of each chemical treatment on the secondary and primary structur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28906461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090281 |
_version_ | 1783267138397536256 |
---|---|
author | Turner, Matthew W. Cort, John R. McDougal, Owen M. |
author_facet | Turner, Matthew W. Cort, John R. McDougal, Owen M. |
author_sort | Turner, Matthew W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nine publically available biosafety protocols for safely handling conotoxin peptides were tested to evaluate their decontamination efficacy. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to assess the effect of each chemical treatment on the secondary and primary structure of α-CTx MII (L10V, E11A). Of the nine decontamination methods tested, treatment with 1% (m/v) solution of the enzymatic detergent Contrex™ EZ resulted in a 76.8% decrease in α-helical content as assessed by the mean residue ellipticity at 222 nm, and partial peptide digestion was demonstrated using high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Additionally, treatment with 6% sodium hypochlorite (m/v) resulted in 80.5% decrease in α-helical content and complete digestion of the peptide. The Contrex™ EZ treatment was repeated with three additional α-conotoxins (α-CTxs), α-CTxs LvIA, ImI and PeIA, which verified the decontamination method was reasonably robust. These results support the use of either 1% Contrex™ EZ solution or 6% sodium hypochlorite in biosafety protocols for the decontamination of α-CTxs in research laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5618214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56182142017-09-29 α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t Turner, Matthew W. Cort, John R. McDougal, Owen M. Toxins (Basel) Article Nine publically available biosafety protocols for safely handling conotoxin peptides were tested to evaluate their decontamination efficacy. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to assess the effect of each chemical treatment on the secondary and primary structure of α-CTx MII (L10V, E11A). Of the nine decontamination methods tested, treatment with 1% (m/v) solution of the enzymatic detergent Contrex™ EZ resulted in a 76.8% decrease in α-helical content as assessed by the mean residue ellipticity at 222 nm, and partial peptide digestion was demonstrated using high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Additionally, treatment with 6% sodium hypochlorite (m/v) resulted in 80.5% decrease in α-helical content and complete digestion of the peptide. The Contrex™ EZ treatment was repeated with three additional α-conotoxins (α-CTxs), α-CTxs LvIA, ImI and PeIA, which verified the decontamination method was reasonably robust. These results support the use of either 1% Contrex™ EZ solution or 6% sodium hypochlorite in biosafety protocols for the decontamination of α-CTxs in research laboratories. MDPI 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5618214/ /pubmed/28906461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090281 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Turner, Matthew W. Cort, John R. McDougal, Owen M. α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t |
title | α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t |
title_full | α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t |
title_fullStr | α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t |
title_full_unstemmed | α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t |
title_short | α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t |
title_sort | α-conotoxin decontamination protocol evaluation: what works and what doesn’t |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28906461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turnermattheww aconotoxindecontaminationprotocolevaluationwhatworksandwhatdoesnt AT cortjohnr aconotoxindecontaminationprotocolevaluationwhatworksandwhatdoesnt AT mcdougalowenm aconotoxindecontaminationprotocolevaluationwhatworksandwhatdoesnt |