Cargando…
Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Q...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974858 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_130_16 |
_version_ | 1783267190823190528 |
---|---|
author | Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata Berná, Alfredo Serna Puchades, Vicente Puchades Amores, David Ramos Baños, Miguel Alcaraz |
author_facet | Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata Berná, Alfredo Serna Puchades, Vicente Puchades Amores, David Ramos Baños, Miguel Alcaraz |
author_sort | Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. MATERIALS AND METHODS: QA was performed for 14 plans using a two-dimensional-array seven29 and EBT3 film. Dose values per session ranged between 7.5 Gy and 18 Gy. The multichannel method was used to obtain a dose map for film. RESULTS: The results obtained were compared with treatment planning system calculated profiles through gamma analysis. Passing criteria were 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm and 3%/1.5 mm with maximum and local dose (LD) normalization. Mean gamma passing rate (GPR) (percentage of points presenting a gamma function value of <1) was obtained and compared. Calibration curves were obtained for each color channel within the dose range 0–16 Gy. Mean GPR values for film were >98.9% for all criteria when normalizing per maximum dose. When using LD, normalization was >92.7%. GPR values for the array were lower for all criteria; this difference being statistically significant when normalizing at LD, reaching 12% for the 3%/1.5 mm criterion. CONCLUSION: Both detectors provide satisfactory results for the QA of plans for VMAT lung SBRT. The film provided greater mean GPR values, afforded greater spatial resolution and was more efficient overall. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5618459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56184592017-10-03 Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata Berná, Alfredo Serna Puchades, Vicente Puchades Amores, David Ramos Baños, Miguel Alcaraz J Med Phys Original Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. MATERIALS AND METHODS: QA was performed for 14 plans using a two-dimensional-array seven29 and EBT3 film. Dose values per session ranged between 7.5 Gy and 18 Gy. The multichannel method was used to obtain a dose map for film. RESULTS: The results obtained were compared with treatment planning system calculated profiles through gamma analysis. Passing criteria were 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm and 3%/1.5 mm with maximum and local dose (LD) normalization. Mean gamma passing rate (GPR) (percentage of points presenting a gamma function value of <1) was obtained and compared. Calibration curves were obtained for each color channel within the dose range 0–16 Gy. Mean GPR values for film were >98.9% for all criteria when normalizing per maximum dose. When using LD, normalization was >92.7%. GPR values for the array were lower for all criteria; this difference being statistically significant when normalizing at LD, reaching 12% for the 3%/1.5 mm criterion. CONCLUSION: Both detectors provide satisfactory results for the QA of plans for VMAT lung SBRT. The film provided greater mean GPR values, afforded greater spatial resolution and was more efficient overall. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5618459/ /pubmed/28974858 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_130_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata Berná, Alfredo Serna Puchades, Vicente Puchades Amores, David Ramos Baños, Miguel Alcaraz Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array |
title | Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array |
title_full | Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array |
title_fullStr | Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array |
title_full_unstemmed | Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array |
title_short | Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array |
title_sort | volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: a comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974858 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_130_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colodrojuanfernandomata volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray AT bernaalfredoserna volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray AT puchadesvicentepuchades volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray AT amoresdavidramos volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray AT banosmiguelalcaraz volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray |