Cargando…

Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata, Berná, Alfredo Serna, Puchades, Vicente Puchades, Amores, David Ramos, Baños, Miguel Alcaraz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974858
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_130_16
_version_ 1783267190823190528
author Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata
Berná, Alfredo Serna
Puchades, Vicente Puchades
Amores, David Ramos
Baños, Miguel Alcaraz
author_facet Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata
Berná, Alfredo Serna
Puchades, Vicente Puchades
Amores, David Ramos
Baños, Miguel Alcaraz
author_sort Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. MATERIALS AND METHODS: QA was performed for 14 plans using a two-dimensional-array seven29 and EBT3 film. Dose values per session ranged between 7.5 Gy and 18 Gy. The multichannel method was used to obtain a dose map for film. RESULTS: The results obtained were compared with treatment planning system calculated profiles through gamma analysis. Passing criteria were 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm and 3%/1.5 mm with maximum and local dose (LD) normalization. Mean gamma passing rate (GPR) (percentage of points presenting a gamma function value of <1) was obtained and compared. Calibration curves were obtained for each color channel within the dose range 0–16 Gy. Mean GPR values for film were >98.9% for all criteria when normalizing per maximum dose. When using LD, normalization was >92.7%. GPR values for the array were lower for all criteria; this difference being statistically significant when normalizing at LD, reaching 12% for the 3%/1.5 mm criterion. CONCLUSION: Both detectors provide satisfactory results for the QA of plans for VMAT lung SBRT. The film provided greater mean GPR values, afforded greater spatial resolution and was more efficient overall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5618459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56184592017-10-03 Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata Berná, Alfredo Serna Puchades, Vicente Puchades Amores, David Ramos Baños, Miguel Alcaraz J Med Phys Original Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. MATERIALS AND METHODS: QA was performed for 14 plans using a two-dimensional-array seven29 and EBT3 film. Dose values per session ranged between 7.5 Gy and 18 Gy. The multichannel method was used to obtain a dose map for film. RESULTS: The results obtained were compared with treatment planning system calculated profiles through gamma analysis. Passing criteria were 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm and 3%/1.5 mm with maximum and local dose (LD) normalization. Mean gamma passing rate (GPR) (percentage of points presenting a gamma function value of <1) was obtained and compared. Calibration curves were obtained for each color channel within the dose range 0–16 Gy. Mean GPR values for film were >98.9% for all criteria when normalizing per maximum dose. When using LD, normalization was >92.7%. GPR values for the array were lower for all criteria; this difference being statistically significant when normalizing at LD, reaching 12% for the 3%/1.5 mm criterion. CONCLUSION: Both detectors provide satisfactory results for the QA of plans for VMAT lung SBRT. The film provided greater mean GPR values, afforded greater spatial resolution and was more efficient overall. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5618459/ /pubmed/28974858 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_130_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Colodro, Juan Fernando Mata
Berná, Alfredo Serna
Puchades, Vicente Puchades
Amores, David Ramos
Baños, Miguel Alcaraz
Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array
title Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array
title_full Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array
title_fullStr Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array
title_full_unstemmed Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array
title_short Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Quality Assurance: A Comparison between Radiochromic Film and Chamber Array
title_sort volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: a comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5618459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974858
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_130_16
work_keys_str_mv AT colodrojuanfernandomata volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray
AT bernaalfredoserna volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray
AT puchadesvicentepuchades volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray
AT amoresdavidramos volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray
AT banosmiguelalcaraz volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray