Cargando…
Scoring systems for the Clock Drawing Test: A historical review
The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a simple neuropsychological screening instrument that is well accepted by patients and has solid psychometric properties. Several different CDT scoring methods have been developed, but no consensus has been reached regarding which scoring method is the most accurate....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do
Comportamento
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5619209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29213488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-010003 |
_version_ | 1783267354167214080 |
---|---|
author | Spenciere, Bárbara Alves, Heloisa Charchat-Fichman, Helenice |
author_facet | Spenciere, Bárbara Alves, Heloisa Charchat-Fichman, Helenice |
author_sort | Spenciere, Bárbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a simple neuropsychological screening instrument that is well accepted by patients and has solid psychometric properties. Several different CDT scoring methods have been developed, but no consensus has been reached regarding which scoring method is the most accurate. This article reviews the literature on these scoring systems and the changes they have undergone over the years. Historically, different types of scoring systems emerged. Initially, the focus was on screening for dementia, and the methods were both quantitative and semi-quantitative. Later, the need for an early diagnosis called for a scoring system that can detect subtle errors, especially those related to executive function. Therefore, qualitative analyses began to be used for both differential and early diagnoses of dementia. A widely used qualitative method was proposed by Rouleau et al. (1992). Tracing the historical path of these scoring methods is important for developing additional scoring systems and furthering dementia prevention research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5619209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do
Comportamento |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56192092017-12-06 Scoring systems for the Clock Drawing Test: A historical review Spenciere, Bárbara Alves, Heloisa Charchat-Fichman, Helenice Dement Neuropsychol Views & Reviews The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a simple neuropsychological screening instrument that is well accepted by patients and has solid psychometric properties. Several different CDT scoring methods have been developed, but no consensus has been reached regarding which scoring method is the most accurate. This article reviews the literature on these scoring systems and the changes they have undergone over the years. Historically, different types of scoring systems emerged. Initially, the focus was on screening for dementia, and the methods were both quantitative and semi-quantitative. Later, the need for an early diagnosis called for a scoring system that can detect subtle errors, especially those related to executive function. Therefore, qualitative analyses began to be used for both differential and early diagnoses of dementia. A widely used qualitative method was proposed by Rouleau et al. (1992). Tracing the historical path of these scoring methods is important for developing additional scoring systems and furthering dementia prevention research. Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5619209/ /pubmed/29213488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-010003 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Views & Reviews Spenciere, Bárbara Alves, Heloisa Charchat-Fichman, Helenice Scoring systems for the Clock Drawing Test: A historical review |
title | Scoring systems for the Clock Drawing Test: A historical
review |
title_full | Scoring systems for the Clock Drawing Test: A historical
review |
title_fullStr | Scoring systems for the Clock Drawing Test: A historical
review |
title_full_unstemmed | Scoring systems for the Clock Drawing Test: A historical
review |
title_short | Scoring systems for the Clock Drawing Test: A historical
review |
title_sort | scoring systems for the clock drawing test: a historical
review |
topic | Views & Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5619209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29213488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-010003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spencierebarbara scoringsystemsfortheclockdrawingtestahistoricalreview AT alvesheloisa scoringsystemsfortheclockdrawingtestahistoricalreview AT charchatfichmanhelenice scoringsystemsfortheclockdrawingtestahistoricalreview |