Cargando…

The performance of the Mini-Cog in a sample of low educational level elderly

OBJECTIVES: To study the criterion validity of the Mini-Cog in low educational level elderly. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and validation design. SETTING: Policlínica Piquet Carneiro, an outpatient unit of Rio de Janeiro State University Hospital, in Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: A convenient sample consisting o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribeiro Filho, Sergio Telles, Lourenço, Roberto Alves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5619223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29213616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642009DN30200003
_version_ 1783267357432479744
author Ribeiro Filho, Sergio Telles
Lourenço, Roberto Alves
author_facet Ribeiro Filho, Sergio Telles
Lourenço, Roberto Alves
author_sort Ribeiro Filho, Sergio Telles
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To study the criterion validity of the Mini-Cog in low educational level elderly. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and validation design. SETTING: Policlínica Piquet Carneiro, an outpatient unit of Rio de Janeiro State University Hospital, in Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: A convenient sample consisting of 306 individuals, 65 yrs or older, selected from April 8(th) to July 15(th), 2002. METHODS: All participants underwent comprehensive geriatric evaluations which included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the cognitive part of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly – Revised (CAMCOG-R). They were classified as demented or non-demented (DSM-IV). A post-hoc analysis was performed on the data from the 3 word recall test of the MMSE, and the Clock Drawing Test from the CAMCOG-R, and respective scores were added and interpreted in accordance with the Mini-Cog protocol. RESULTS: 293 individuals completed all the study steps; 211 had 4 or less years of schooling and were included in the data analysis. 32% had dementia. Mini-Cog sensitivity and specificity was consistently low independently of the different cut-off points considered. The best performance was found at the cut-off point of 2/3 which yielded sensitivity and specificity of 60% and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Mini-Cog is not a good cognitive screening tool for individuals with less than five years of formal education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5619223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56192232017-12-06 The performance of the Mini-Cog in a sample of low educational level elderly Ribeiro Filho, Sergio Telles Lourenço, Roberto Alves Dement Neuropsychol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To study the criterion validity of the Mini-Cog in low educational level elderly. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and validation design. SETTING: Policlínica Piquet Carneiro, an outpatient unit of Rio de Janeiro State University Hospital, in Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: A convenient sample consisting of 306 individuals, 65 yrs or older, selected from April 8(th) to July 15(th), 2002. METHODS: All participants underwent comprehensive geriatric evaluations which included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the cognitive part of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly – Revised (CAMCOG-R). They were classified as demented or non-demented (DSM-IV). A post-hoc analysis was performed on the data from the 3 word recall test of the MMSE, and the Clock Drawing Test from the CAMCOG-R, and respective scores were added and interpreted in accordance with the Mini-Cog protocol. RESULTS: 293 individuals completed all the study steps; 211 had 4 or less years of schooling and were included in the data analysis. 32% had dementia. Mini-Cog sensitivity and specificity was consistently low independently of the different cut-off points considered. The best performance was found at the cut-off point of 2/3 which yielded sensitivity and specificity of 60% and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Mini-Cog is not a good cognitive screening tool for individuals with less than five years of formal education. Associação de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC5619223/ /pubmed/29213616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642009DN30200003 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ribeiro Filho, Sergio Telles
Lourenço, Roberto Alves
The performance of the Mini-Cog in a sample of low educational level elderly
title The performance of the Mini-Cog in a sample of low educational level elderly
title_full The performance of the Mini-Cog in a sample of low educational level elderly
title_fullStr The performance of the Mini-Cog in a sample of low educational level elderly
title_full_unstemmed The performance of the Mini-Cog in a sample of low educational level elderly
title_short The performance of the Mini-Cog in a sample of low educational level elderly
title_sort performance of the mini-cog in a sample of low educational level elderly
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5619223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29213616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642009DN30200003
work_keys_str_mv AT ribeirofilhosergiotelles theperformanceoftheminicoginasampleofloweducationallevelelderly
AT lourencorobertoalves theperformanceoftheminicoginasampleofloweducationallevelelderly
AT ribeirofilhosergiotelles performanceoftheminicoginasampleofloweducationallevelelderly
AT lourencorobertoalves performanceoftheminicoginasampleofloweducationallevelelderly