Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection—A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quadruple therapy is recommended as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication failure. However, high cost, multiple side effects, and low adherence rates are major drawbacks to its routine use. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of sequential versus q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munteanu, Daniela, Etzion, Ohad, Ben-Yakov, Gil, Halperin, Daniel, Eidelman, Leslie, Schwartz, Doron, Novack, Victor, Abufreha, Naim, Krugliak, Pavel, Rozenthal, Alexander, Gaspar, Nava, Moshkalo, Alexander, Dizingof, Vitaly, Fich, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5619725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28957341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183302
_version_ 1783267453500915712
author Munteanu, Daniela
Etzion, Ohad
Ben-Yakov, Gil
Halperin, Daniel
Eidelman, Leslie
Schwartz, Doron
Novack, Victor
Abufreha, Naim
Krugliak, Pavel
Rozenthal, Alexander
Gaspar, Nava
Moshkalo, Alexander
Dizingof, Vitaly
Fich, Alexander
author_facet Munteanu, Daniela
Etzion, Ohad
Ben-Yakov, Gil
Halperin, Daniel
Eidelman, Leslie
Schwartz, Doron
Novack, Victor
Abufreha, Naim
Krugliak, Pavel
Rozenthal, Alexander
Gaspar, Nava
Moshkalo, Alexander
Dizingof, Vitaly
Fich, Alexander
author_sort Munteanu, Daniela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quadruple therapy is recommended as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication failure. However, high cost, multiple side effects, and low adherence rates are major drawbacks to its routine use. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple regimens as second line treatment for persistent Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, open label trial was conducted at a large academic, tertiary care center in Israel. Patients who previously failed a standard triple treatment eradication course were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a 10-day sequential therapy course, or a 14-day quadruple regimen. Compliance and adverse events were evaluated by telephone questionnaires. The primary endpoint for analysis was the rate of Helicobacter pylori eradication as defined by either a negative 13C-urea breath-test, or stool antigen test, 4–16 weeks after treatment assessed under the non-inferiority hypothesis. The trial was terminated prematurely due to low recruitment rates. See S1 Checklist for CONSORT checklist. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were randomized. Per modified intention-to-treat analysis, eradication rate was 49% in the sequential versus 42.5% in the quadruple regimen group (p-value for non-inferiority 0.02). Forty-two (84.0%) versus 33 (64.7%) patients completed treatment in the sequential and quadruple groups respectively (p 0.027). Gastrointestinal side effects were more common in the quadruple regimen group. CONCLUSION: Sequential treatment when used as a second line regimen, was non-inferior to the standard of care quadruple regimen in achieving Helicobacter pylori eradication, and was associated with better compliance and fewer adverse effects. Both treatment protocols failed to show an adequate eradication rate in the population of Southern Israel. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01481844
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5619725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56197252017-10-17 Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection—A randomized controlled trial Munteanu, Daniela Etzion, Ohad Ben-Yakov, Gil Halperin, Daniel Eidelman, Leslie Schwartz, Doron Novack, Victor Abufreha, Naim Krugliak, Pavel Rozenthal, Alexander Gaspar, Nava Moshkalo, Alexander Dizingof, Vitaly Fich, Alexander PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quadruple therapy is recommended as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication failure. However, high cost, multiple side effects, and low adherence rates are major drawbacks to its routine use. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple regimens as second line treatment for persistent Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, open label trial was conducted at a large academic, tertiary care center in Israel. Patients who previously failed a standard triple treatment eradication course were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a 10-day sequential therapy course, or a 14-day quadruple regimen. Compliance and adverse events were evaluated by telephone questionnaires. The primary endpoint for analysis was the rate of Helicobacter pylori eradication as defined by either a negative 13C-urea breath-test, or stool antigen test, 4–16 weeks after treatment assessed under the non-inferiority hypothesis. The trial was terminated prematurely due to low recruitment rates. See S1 Checklist for CONSORT checklist. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were randomized. Per modified intention-to-treat analysis, eradication rate was 49% in the sequential versus 42.5% in the quadruple regimen group (p-value for non-inferiority 0.02). Forty-two (84.0%) versus 33 (64.7%) patients completed treatment in the sequential and quadruple groups respectively (p 0.027). Gastrointestinal side effects were more common in the quadruple regimen group. CONCLUSION: Sequential treatment when used as a second line regimen, was non-inferior to the standard of care quadruple regimen in achieving Helicobacter pylori eradication, and was associated with better compliance and fewer adverse effects. Both treatment protocols failed to show an adequate eradication rate in the population of Southern Israel. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01481844 Public Library of Science 2017-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5619725/ /pubmed/28957341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183302 Text en © 2017 Munteanu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Munteanu, Daniela
Etzion, Ohad
Ben-Yakov, Gil
Halperin, Daniel
Eidelman, Leslie
Schwartz, Doron
Novack, Victor
Abufreha, Naim
Krugliak, Pavel
Rozenthal, Alexander
Gaspar, Nava
Moshkalo, Alexander
Dizingof, Vitaly
Fich, Alexander
Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection—A randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection—A randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection—A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection—A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection—A randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection—A randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection—a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5619725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28957341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183302
work_keys_str_mv AT munteanudaniela efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT etzionohad efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT benyakovgil efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT halperindaniel efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eidelmanleslie efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schwartzdoron efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT novackvictor efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abufrehanaim efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krugliakpavel efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rozenthalalexander efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gasparnava efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moshkaloalexander efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dizingofvitaly efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fichalexander efficacyandsafetyofsequentialversusquadrupletherapyassecondlinetreatmentforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionarandomizedcontrolledtrial