Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal injections combined with the FOLFOX regimen for treating gastric cancer in China: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) have been proven beneficial to patients with gastric cancer for improving clinical efficacy and relieving adverse reactions (ADRs) of chemotherapy. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted in this study to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Dan, Zheng, Jiewen, Ni, Mengwei, Wu, Jiarui, Wang, Kuaihuan, Duan, Xiaojiao, Zhang, Xiaomeng, Zhang, Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28978164
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20320
_version_ 1783267560436793344
author Zhang, Dan
Zheng, Jiewen
Ni, Mengwei
Wu, Jiarui
Wang, Kuaihuan
Duan, Xiaojiao
Zhang, Xiaomeng
Zhang, Bing
author_facet Zhang, Dan
Zheng, Jiewen
Ni, Mengwei
Wu, Jiarui
Wang, Kuaihuan
Duan, Xiaojiao
Zhang, Xiaomeng
Zhang, Bing
author_sort Zhang, Dan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) have been proven beneficial to patients with gastric cancer for improving clinical efficacy and relieving adverse reactions (ADRs) of chemotherapy. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted in this study to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of CHIs combined with FOLFOX regimen for treating gastric cancer. RESULTS: A total of 2316 records were searched, and 81 eligible RCTs involving 15 types of CHIs and 5978 patients were included in the NMA. The results showed that patients who received Shengqifuzheng+ FOLFOX, Compound kushen+ FOLFOX, Huachansu+ FOLFOX, Astragalus+ FOLFOX, Kangai+ FOLFOX, and Lentinan injection + FOLFOX could significantly improve clinical efficacy than using FOLFOX single, and their odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)s were 1.57 (1.19,2.09), 2.12 (1.62,2.78),1.72 (1.08,2.80), 3.06 (1.01,8.99), 2.01 (1.52,2.70), and 1.99 (1.20,3.38) respectively. Furthermore, the therapy of Aidi+ FOLFOX, Shenqifuzheng+ FOLFOX, Compound Kushen+ FOLFOX, Huachansu+ FOLFOX, Astragalus polysaccharides+ FOLFOX, Kangai+ FOLFOX, Ginseng polysaccharide+ FOLFOX, Lentinan+ FOLFOX, Xiaoaiping+ FOLFOX, and Shenmai injection + FOLFOX could also achieve a higher performance status compared with FOLFOX regimen alone. Similarly, patients who received CHIs combine with FOLFOX regimen were associated with a significantly decrease the incidence of leucopenia, gastrointestinal reaction and hepatic dysfunction. Cluster analysis demonstrated that Astragalus polysaccharides+ FOLFOX, and Kangai+ FOLFOX seemed optimal therapies in improving clinical efficacy and performance status; Astragalus polysaccharides+ FOLFOX was superior in reducing leucopenia and gastrointestinal reaction; Disodium Cantharidinate and Vitamin B6+ FOLFOX was associated with favorable effects in reducing gastrointestinal reaction and hepatic dysfunction. By contrary, receiving FOLFOX regimen single was proved to rank the worst for these outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in several electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trial (RCTs) regarding CHIs for gastric cancer until January 10, 2017. The quality assessment was accomplished according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the methodological section of the CONSORT statement. And a random-effects model NMA was utilized to compare different CHIs combined with FOLFOX regimen with regard to efficacy and safety. Data were analyzed using STATA 12.0 and Win-BUGS 1.4 software. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this NMA suggested that among 15 types of CHIs, Astragalus polysaccharides injection combined with FOLFOX regimen seemed optimal for patients with gastric cancer in improving clinical efficacy and performance status, and relieving ADRs. However, our findings should be confirmed by more prospectively designed, large-sample and multi-center RCTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5620304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56203042017-10-03 Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal injections combined with the FOLFOX regimen for treating gastric cancer in China: a network meta-analysis Zhang, Dan Zheng, Jiewen Ni, Mengwei Wu, Jiarui Wang, Kuaihuan Duan, Xiaojiao Zhang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Bing Oncotarget Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) have been proven beneficial to patients with gastric cancer for improving clinical efficacy and relieving adverse reactions (ADRs) of chemotherapy. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted in this study to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of CHIs combined with FOLFOX regimen for treating gastric cancer. RESULTS: A total of 2316 records were searched, and 81 eligible RCTs involving 15 types of CHIs and 5978 patients were included in the NMA. The results showed that patients who received Shengqifuzheng+ FOLFOX, Compound kushen+ FOLFOX, Huachansu+ FOLFOX, Astragalus+ FOLFOX, Kangai+ FOLFOX, and Lentinan injection + FOLFOX could significantly improve clinical efficacy than using FOLFOX single, and their odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)s were 1.57 (1.19,2.09), 2.12 (1.62,2.78),1.72 (1.08,2.80), 3.06 (1.01,8.99), 2.01 (1.52,2.70), and 1.99 (1.20,3.38) respectively. Furthermore, the therapy of Aidi+ FOLFOX, Shenqifuzheng+ FOLFOX, Compound Kushen+ FOLFOX, Huachansu+ FOLFOX, Astragalus polysaccharides+ FOLFOX, Kangai+ FOLFOX, Ginseng polysaccharide+ FOLFOX, Lentinan+ FOLFOX, Xiaoaiping+ FOLFOX, and Shenmai injection + FOLFOX could also achieve a higher performance status compared with FOLFOX regimen alone. Similarly, patients who received CHIs combine with FOLFOX regimen were associated with a significantly decrease the incidence of leucopenia, gastrointestinal reaction and hepatic dysfunction. Cluster analysis demonstrated that Astragalus polysaccharides+ FOLFOX, and Kangai+ FOLFOX seemed optimal therapies in improving clinical efficacy and performance status; Astragalus polysaccharides+ FOLFOX was superior in reducing leucopenia and gastrointestinal reaction; Disodium Cantharidinate and Vitamin B6+ FOLFOX was associated with favorable effects in reducing gastrointestinal reaction and hepatic dysfunction. By contrary, receiving FOLFOX regimen single was proved to rank the worst for these outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in several electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trial (RCTs) regarding CHIs for gastric cancer until January 10, 2017. The quality assessment was accomplished according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the methodological section of the CONSORT statement. And a random-effects model NMA was utilized to compare different CHIs combined with FOLFOX regimen with regard to efficacy and safety. Data were analyzed using STATA 12.0 and Win-BUGS 1.4 software. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this NMA suggested that among 15 types of CHIs, Astragalus polysaccharides injection combined with FOLFOX regimen seemed optimal for patients with gastric cancer in improving clinical efficacy and performance status, and relieving ADRs. However, our findings should be confirmed by more prospectively designed, large-sample and multi-center RCTs. Impact Journals LLC 2017-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5620304/ /pubmed/28978164 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20320 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Zhang, Dan
Zheng, Jiewen
Ni, Mengwei
Wu, Jiarui
Wang, Kuaihuan
Duan, Xiaojiao
Zhang, Xiaomeng
Zhang, Bing
Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal injections combined with the FOLFOX regimen for treating gastric cancer in China: a network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal injections combined with the FOLFOX regimen for treating gastric cancer in China: a network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal injections combined with the FOLFOX regimen for treating gastric cancer in China: a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal injections combined with the FOLFOX regimen for treating gastric cancer in China: a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal injections combined with the FOLFOX regimen for treating gastric cancer in China: a network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal injections combined with the FOLFOX regimen for treating gastric cancer in China: a network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of chinese herbal injections combined with the folfox regimen for treating gastric cancer in china: a network meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28978164
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20320
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangdan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofchineseherbalinjectionscombinedwiththefolfoxregimenfortreatinggastriccancerinchinaanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhengjiewen comparativeefficacyandsafetyofchineseherbalinjectionscombinedwiththefolfoxregimenfortreatinggastriccancerinchinaanetworkmetaanalysis
AT nimengwei comparativeefficacyandsafetyofchineseherbalinjectionscombinedwiththefolfoxregimenfortreatinggastriccancerinchinaanetworkmetaanalysis
AT wujiarui comparativeefficacyandsafetyofchineseherbalinjectionscombinedwiththefolfoxregimenfortreatinggastriccancerinchinaanetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangkuaihuan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofchineseherbalinjectionscombinedwiththefolfoxregimenfortreatinggastriccancerinchinaanetworkmetaanalysis
AT duanxiaojiao comparativeefficacyandsafetyofchineseherbalinjectionscombinedwiththefolfoxregimenfortreatinggastriccancerinchinaanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangxiaomeng comparativeefficacyandsafetyofchineseherbalinjectionscombinedwiththefolfoxregimenfortreatinggastriccancerinchinaanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangbing comparativeefficacyandsafetyofchineseherbalinjectionscombinedwiththefolfoxregimenfortreatinggastriccancerinchinaanetworkmetaanalysis