Cargando…
NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry
PURPOSE: Accurate testing for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is essential for breast cancer treatment. At present, immunohistochemistry (IHC)/florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are widely accepted as the standard testing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Breast Cancer Society
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2017.20.3.286 |
_version_ | 1783267588049993728 |
---|---|
author | Hyeon, Jiyeon Cho, Soo Youn Hong, Min Eui Kang, So Young Do, Ingu Im, Young Hyuck Cho, Eun Yoon |
author_facet | Hyeon, Jiyeon Cho, Soo Youn Hong, Min Eui Kang, So Young Do, Ingu Im, Young Hyuck Cho, Eun Yoon |
author_sort | Hyeon, Jiyeon |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Accurate testing for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is essential for breast cancer treatment. At present, immunohistochemistry (IHC)/florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are widely accepted as the standard testing methods. To investigate the value of NanoString nCounter®, we performed its comparative analysis with IHC/FISH and real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for the assessment of ER, PR, and HER2. METHODS: Data on IHC/FISH results for ER, PR, and HER2 in 240 patients from a single tertiary hospital in Korea were collected and compared with NanoString nCounter® and qRT-PCR results at a single institution. RESULTS: Expression levels for each gene using NanoString nCounter® showed good correlation with the corresponding data for protein expression by IHC (p<0.001) and gene amplification status for HER2 (p<0.001). Comparisons between gene expression and IHC data showed good overall agreement with a high area under the curve (AUC) for ESR1/ER (AUC=0.939), PgR/PR (AUC=0.796), and HER2/HER2 (AUC=0.989) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The quantification of ER, PgR, and HER2 mRNA expression with NanoString nCounter® may be a viable alternative to conventional IHC/FISH methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5620444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Breast Cancer Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56204442017-10-02 NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry Hyeon, Jiyeon Cho, Soo Youn Hong, Min Eui Kang, So Young Do, Ingu Im, Young Hyuck Cho, Eun Yoon J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Accurate testing for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is essential for breast cancer treatment. At present, immunohistochemistry (IHC)/florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are widely accepted as the standard testing methods. To investigate the value of NanoString nCounter®, we performed its comparative analysis with IHC/FISH and real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for the assessment of ER, PR, and HER2. METHODS: Data on IHC/FISH results for ER, PR, and HER2 in 240 patients from a single tertiary hospital in Korea were collected and compared with NanoString nCounter® and qRT-PCR results at a single institution. RESULTS: Expression levels for each gene using NanoString nCounter® showed good correlation with the corresponding data for protein expression by IHC (p<0.001) and gene amplification status for HER2 (p<0.001). Comparisons between gene expression and IHC data showed good overall agreement with a high area under the curve (AUC) for ESR1/ER (AUC=0.939), PgR/PR (AUC=0.796), and HER2/HER2 (AUC=0.989) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The quantification of ER, PgR, and HER2 mRNA expression with NanoString nCounter® may be a viable alternative to conventional IHC/FISH methods. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2017-09 2017-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5620444/ /pubmed/28970855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2017.20.3.286 Text en © 2017 Korean Breast Cancer Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hyeon, Jiyeon Cho, Soo Youn Hong, Min Eui Kang, So Young Do, Ingu Im, Young Hyuck Cho, Eun Yoon NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry |
title | NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry |
title_full | NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry |
title_fullStr | NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry |
title_full_unstemmed | NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry |
title_short | NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry |
title_sort | nanostring ncounter® approach in breast cancer: a comparative analysis with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2017.20.3.286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hyeonjiyeon nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry AT chosooyoun nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry AT hongmineui nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry AT kangsoyoung nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry AT doingu nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry AT imyounghyuck nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry AT choeunyoon nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry |