Cargando…

NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry

PURPOSE: Accurate testing for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is essential for breast cancer treatment. At present, immunohistochemistry (IHC)/florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are widely accepted as the standard testing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyeon, Jiyeon, Cho, Soo Youn, Hong, Min Eui, Kang, So Young, Do, Ingu, Im, Young Hyuck, Cho, Eun Yoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Breast Cancer Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970855
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2017.20.3.286
_version_ 1783267588049993728
author Hyeon, Jiyeon
Cho, Soo Youn
Hong, Min Eui
Kang, So Young
Do, Ingu
Im, Young Hyuck
Cho, Eun Yoon
author_facet Hyeon, Jiyeon
Cho, Soo Youn
Hong, Min Eui
Kang, So Young
Do, Ingu
Im, Young Hyuck
Cho, Eun Yoon
author_sort Hyeon, Jiyeon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Accurate testing for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is essential for breast cancer treatment. At present, immunohistochemistry (IHC)/florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are widely accepted as the standard testing methods. To investigate the value of NanoString nCounter®, we performed its comparative analysis with IHC/FISH and real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for the assessment of ER, PR, and HER2. METHODS: Data on IHC/FISH results for ER, PR, and HER2 in 240 patients from a single tertiary hospital in Korea were collected and compared with NanoString nCounter® and qRT-PCR results at a single institution. RESULTS: Expression levels for each gene using NanoString nCounter® showed good correlation with the corresponding data for protein expression by IHC (p<0.001) and gene amplification status for HER2 (p<0.001). Comparisons between gene expression and IHC data showed good overall agreement with a high area under the curve (AUC) for ESR1/ER (AUC=0.939), PgR/PR (AUC=0.796), and HER2/HER2 (AUC=0.989) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The quantification of ER, PgR, and HER2 mRNA expression with NanoString nCounter® may be a viable alternative to conventional IHC/FISH methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5620444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56204442017-10-02 NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry Hyeon, Jiyeon Cho, Soo Youn Hong, Min Eui Kang, So Young Do, Ingu Im, Young Hyuck Cho, Eun Yoon J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Accurate testing for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is essential for breast cancer treatment. At present, immunohistochemistry (IHC)/florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are widely accepted as the standard testing methods. To investigate the value of NanoString nCounter®, we performed its comparative analysis with IHC/FISH and real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for the assessment of ER, PR, and HER2. METHODS: Data on IHC/FISH results for ER, PR, and HER2 in 240 patients from a single tertiary hospital in Korea were collected and compared with NanoString nCounter® and qRT-PCR results at a single institution. RESULTS: Expression levels for each gene using NanoString nCounter® showed good correlation with the corresponding data for protein expression by IHC (p<0.001) and gene amplification status for HER2 (p<0.001). Comparisons between gene expression and IHC data showed good overall agreement with a high area under the curve (AUC) for ESR1/ER (AUC=0.939), PgR/PR (AUC=0.796), and HER2/HER2 (AUC=0.989) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The quantification of ER, PgR, and HER2 mRNA expression with NanoString nCounter® may be a viable alternative to conventional IHC/FISH methods. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2017-09 2017-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5620444/ /pubmed/28970855 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2017.20.3.286 Text en © 2017 Korean Breast Cancer Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hyeon, Jiyeon
Cho, Soo Youn
Hong, Min Eui
Kang, So Young
Do, Ingu
Im, Young Hyuck
Cho, Eun Yoon
NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry
title NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry
title_full NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry
title_fullStr NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry
title_full_unstemmed NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry
title_short NanoString nCounter® Approach in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis with Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, and Immunohistochemistry
title_sort nanostring ncounter® approach in breast cancer: a comparative analysis with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970855
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2017.20.3.286
work_keys_str_mv AT hyeonjiyeon nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry
AT chosooyoun nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry
AT hongmineui nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry
AT kangsoyoung nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry
AT doingu nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry
AT imyounghyuck nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry
AT choeunyoon nanostringncounterapproachinbreastcanceracomparativeanalysiswithquantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactioninsituhybridizationandimmunohistochemistry